I've been sitting on this K-Pop think piece for several weeks, pondering exactly how I could best present and represent my viewpoints without them getting diluted by petty fanwars. I remain skeptical that I can achieve that, but let's give this a shot.
A common sentiment I've seen shared from AKP to reddit to that cesspool, X, is that groups these days have it easy and their accomplishments aren't as impressive, because life was harder in previous generations.
As usual, a topic with nuance is immediately made into a binary "it's this or that" conversation. But I think it's fair to establish this baseline:
With the rapid expansion of K-Pop, thanks to the Hallyu Wave 2nd Gen ushered in, and the unimaginable success in the West 3rd generation achieved, 4th generation groups have reaped the benefits of K-Pop being listened to and consumed at unprecedented levels.
Okay, we have that out of the way and I hope it's clear I'm not invalidating what previous generations did. They're the reason I'm a K-Pop fan today; I wouldn't minimize them.
So what about the 4th generation and beyond is challenging? I think the first answer is the most obvious answer:
The competition and field has never been deeper. There is a literal surplus of groups to invest in, and there will almost always be a "shiny new group" almost every year.
In previous generations, nugu groups and companies could fight for their piece of the pie, and some overcame those odds, but today much bigger labels are debuting so many groups almost every year.
The other obvious difference between this generation and previous generations is that, at least globally, 3rd generation has way more longevity than their predecessors. By the time Twice and BlackPink debuted, 2NE1 and Wonder Girls were disbanded and SNSD were content to just be a legacy act that returns occasionally for big anniversaries.
And if you look at the poor 4th Gen boy groups, the shadow of BTS loomed large over literally their entire generation. It's not BTS's fault, but if you just look at the numbers, no 4th gen boy group had any sustained chart success anywhere close to the scale of their predecessors (and apparently even their successors with how 5th gen is starting).
The last reason, or at least the last I feel like presenting, is innovation. I hate to do this to them, but I'm going to use Babymonster as an example.
Their debut, objectively speaking, was a total flop. But ask yourself this: If they debuted in 2016, how would they have charted? I have a feeling it wouldn't be in MelOn's basement in the 500s like their most recent single. This debut destroyed the theory that top 4th Gen groups only hit their numbers thanks to hype, as BM had plenty of it.
And what was the main critique from both Korean and international fans?
"Typical YG production"
"Dated and stale song choice"
"Lacks creativity and impact"
You get the point. And it's not just YG. Just look at any conversation here about JYP girl groups.
The old formulas for success aren't yielding results like they used to, and creative/marketing teams can't coast any more.
Polarizing as they can be at times, look at how (G)I-DLE broke through with their bold concepts and themes.
Have you seen any LE SSERAFIM trailer? They're the best in the industry.
And NewJeans? SM only paid a consulting firm literal millions to understand why they're so successful.
The industry is moving at light speed compared to previous generations, and every label wants their cut, sometimes so much that it leads to disaster (50/50 and ATTRAKT).
But this concludes my latest YamaEssay. Give 4th generation groups their props, especially the ones who made history (mainly the girl groups sadly for the guys), because it was anything but easy.
This is the first of several think pieces I'll be typing up for the second half of this week