Why are people celebrating Eunbi but defaming Jennie?
-
oh I didn't think about it but now you bring it up yes but are you surprised? there is always double standards when it comes to Jennie
-
I had this exact same thread idea on my mind
-
because volume up
-
-
It's really weird.
-
-
-
-
eunbi is literally 4 months older than jennie lol what are you going on about old man
just to entertain your crazy nonsense, I guarantee you no one gives a damn about either of these women’s actual age lol. Jennie does have quite a case of baby face tho, so if you want to cook up some conspiracy theory at least try to make look it half logical 
-
-
Fancam is over 1mil views in slightly over 1 day, stream juseyo
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
-
Izonehouse flopping again
-
-
-
-
-
To my assessment there is an underlying difference between the two.
Eunbi's performance took place at a Korean festival in Korea attended by Koreans. While on the more provocative and sexual side, it still perhaps falls within the spectrum of tolerated behavior. In such a context some idols can get away with more provocative sexual displays, as it's in house (i.e. for Korea). Think Sunmi, etc.
In contrast, Jennie is performing for a foreign audience. Not Korea. This carries with it different reputational and cultural expectations and implications. Such a blatant sexual display for foreigners carries much more pronounced expectations and weight as it comes to how she is seen to represent Korea in a foreign context, what values she is projecting, and how that reflects on Korea. There's much more responsibility there for her to uphold a standard that does not debase or compromise herself, and in turn, her homeland.
As perhaps the single most prominent current Korean female representing Korea abroad, Jennie is effectively the international face of Korean feminine cultural identity. She represents not just herself, not just BLACKPINK, but Korea as a nation and the ethos it wishes to project through its manifestation of Hallyu abroad.
Within such a context, as a role model and cultural representative for Korea and in particular as a representative of Korean women, that she is essentially acting out explicit sexual scenes for the foreign market, even if fictional, presumably in exchange for greater access to or acceptance within said market, it can be seen as deeply antithetical to the cultural values of Korea proper and degrading as it comes to the generally positive cultural exchange greater Hallyu attempts to export internationally through its other Hallyu pillars.
To put it bluntly, in such a sensitive cultural framework, Jennie can be seen as having essentially sold herself to foreign interests in a debasing context for monetary gain or favor. This is not something positive, and can be seen as shameful from such a cultural exchange perspective.
Thus explains the harsh of criticism she has underwent for her actions.
In contrast, and to bring it back to the initial post's comparison to the actions of Eunbi or others, their domestic performances simply do not carry the same cultural implications and reputational sensitivities.
They are presumably given more leeway.
-
-
-
-
-
we all know when it comes to jennie - there will be loads of hate. its not new
Gorgeous pfp
-
Display More
To my assessment there is an underlying difference between the two.
Eunbi's performance took place at a Korean festival in Korea attended by Koreans. While on the more provocative and sexual side, it still perhaps falls within the spectrum of tolerated behavior. In such a context some idols can get away with more provocative sexual displays, as it's in house (i.e. for Korea). Think Sunmi, etc.
In contrast, Jennie is performing for a foreign audience. Not Korea. This carries with it different reputational and cultural expectations and implications. Such a blatant sexual display for foreigners carries much more pronounced expectations and weight as it comes to how she is seen to represent Korea in a foreign context, what values she is projecting, and how that reflects on Korea. There's much more responsibility there for her to uphold a standard that does not debase or compromise herself, and in turn, her homeland.
As perhaps the single most prominent current Korean female representing Korea abroad, Jennie is effectively the international face of Korean feminine cultural identity. She represents not just herself, not just BLACKPINK, but Korea as a nation and the ethos it wishes to project through its manifestation of Hallyu abroad.
Within such a context, as a role model and cultural representative for Korea and in particular as a representative of Korean women, that she is essentially acting out explicit sexual scenes for the foreign market, even if fictional, presumably in exchange for greater access to or acceptance within said market, it can be seen as deeply antithetical to the cultural values of Korea proper and degrading as it comes to the generally positive cultural exchange greater Hallyu attempts to export internationally through its other Hallyu pillars.
To put it bluntly, in such a sensitive cultural framework, Jennie can be seen as having essentially sold herself to foreign interests in a debasing context for monetary gain or favor. This is not something positive, and can be seen as shameful from such a cultural exchange perspective.
Thus explains the harsh of criticism she has underwent for her actions.
In contrast, and to bring it back to the initial post's comparison to the actions of Eunbi or others, their domestic performances simply do not carry the same cultural implications and reputational sensitivities.
They are presumably given more leeway.
You wrote entire book on it😱
-
Mother eunbi
-
-
Gorgeous pfp
I would say the same thing with your signature💖
-
lbr
they like her pics for her boobs
nobody here, maybe except for bphouse or some very random users talk abou izone solos
and its the same in pann/nate/theqoo u name it
and it will be whatever if kpop fans werent hypocrite but they arent
in the end jennie will keep getting hated but love by her real fans while this poor girls people used for clicks and baits will just be ignored
-
Display More
To my assessment there is an underlying difference between the two.
Eunbi's performance took place at a Korean festival in Korea attended by Koreans. While on the more provocative and sexual side, it still perhaps falls within the spectrum of tolerated behavior. In such a context some idols can get away with more provocative sexual displays, as it's in house (i.e. for Korea). Think Sunmi, etc.
In contrast, Jennie is performing for a foreign audience. Not Korea. This carries with it different reputational and cultural expectations and implications. Such a blatant sexual display for foreigners carries much more pronounced expectations and weight as it comes to how she is seen to represent Korea in a foreign context, what values she is projecting, and how that reflects on Korea. There's much more responsibility there for her to uphold a standard that does not debase or compromise herself, and in turn, her homeland.
As perhaps the single most prominent current Korean female representing Korea abroad, Jennie is effectively the international face of Korean feminine cultural identity. She represents not just herself, not just BLACKPINK, but Korea as a nation and the ethos it wishes to project through its manifestation of Hallyu abroad.
Within such a context, as a role model and cultural representative for Korea and in particular as a representative of Korean women, that she is essentially acting out explicit sexual scenes for the foreign market, even if fictional, presumably in exchange for greater access to or acceptance within said market, it can be seen as deeply antithetical to the cultural values of Korea proper and degrading as it comes to the generally positive cultural exchange greater Hallyu attempts to export internationally through its other Hallyu pillars.
To put it bluntly, in such a sensitive cultural framework, Jennie can be seen as having essentially sold herself to foreign interests in a debasing context for monetary gain or favor. This is not something positive, and can be seen as shameful from such a cultural exchange perspective.
Thus explains the harsh of criticism she has underwent for her actions.
In contrast, and to bring it back to the initial post's comparison to the actions of Eunbi or others, their domestic performances simply do not carry the same cultural implications and reputational sensitivities.
They are presumably given more leeway.
girl ..or maybe boy bc just a man would write smth like this
eunbi is viral now bc of her tits, that it
nobody ever talk about her music or care for her talent before bc she didn't have cleavege to show as sad as that sound
and she shows it on waterbomb that has multiple controversies and its in Korea that its a more conservative country that the ones Jennie has performed with small clothes
enubi get not hate bc nobody hate to begin with bc nobody talk about her before this
-
or some very random users talk abou izone solos
i'm a very random user that talks about izone solos at every possible opportunity, thanks for noticing me
-
-
Display More
To my assessment there is an underlying difference between the two.
Eunbi's performance took place at a Korean festival in Korea attended by Koreans. While on the more provocative and sexual side, it still perhaps falls within the spectrum of tolerated behavior. In such a context some idols can get away with more provocative sexual displays, as it's in house (i.e. for Korea). Think Sunmi, etc.
In contrast, Jennie is performing for a foreign audience. Not Korea. This carries with it different reputational and cultural expectations and implications. Such a blatant sexual display for foreigners carries much more pronounced expectations and weight as it comes to how she is seen to represent Korea in a foreign context, what values she is projecting, and how that reflects on Korea. There's much more responsibility there for her to uphold a standard that does not debase or compromise herself, and in turn, her homeland.
As perhaps the single most prominent current Korean female representing Korea abroad, Jennie is effectively the international face of Korean feminine cultural identity. She represents not just herself, not just BLACKPINK, but Korea as a nation and the ethos it wishes to project through its manifestation of Hallyu abroad.
Within such a context, as a role model and cultural representative for Korea and in particular as a representative of Korean women, that she is essentially acting out explicit sexual scenes for the foreign market, even if fictional, presumably in exchange for greater access to or acceptance within said market, it can be seen as deeply antithetical to the cultural values of Korea proper and degrading as it comes to the generally positive cultural exchange greater Hallyu attempts to export internationally through its other Hallyu pillars.
To put it bluntly, in such a sensitive cultural framework, Jennie can be seen as having essentially sold herself to foreign interests in a debasing context for monetary gain or favor. This is not something positive, and can be seen as shameful from such a cultural exchange perspective.
Thus explains the harsh of criticism she has underwent for her actions.
In contrast, and to bring it back to the initial post's comparison to the actions of Eunbi or others, their domestic performances simply do not carry the same cultural implications and reputational sensitivities.
They are presumably given more leeway.
In short: the incels are mad
-
because volume up
The 4minute song?
-
In other words, people pretend to be "moral" when it suits their agenda, and that's the normal state of life
Do you ever smile, Teshub?
-
-
-
-
Display More
To my assessment there is an underlying difference between the two.
Eunbi's performance took place at a Korean festival in Korea attended by Koreans. While on the more provocative and sexual side, it still perhaps falls within the spectrum of tolerated behavior. In such a context some idols can get away with more provocative sexual displays, as it's in house (i.e. for Korea). Think Sunmi, etc.
In contrast, Jennie is performing for a foreign audience. Not Korea. This carries with it different reputational and cultural expectations and implications. Such a blatant sexual display for foreigners carries much more pronounced expectations and weight as it comes to how she is seen to represent Korea in a foreign context, what values she is projecting, and how that reflects on Korea. There's much more responsibility there for her to uphold a standard that does not debase or compromise herself, and in turn, her homeland.
As perhaps the single most prominent current Korean female representing Korea abroad, Jennie is effectively the international face of Korean feminine cultural identity. She represents not just herself, not just BLACKPINK, but Korea as a nation and the ethos it wishes to project through its manifestation of Hallyu abroad.
Within such a context, as a role model and cultural representative for Korea and in particular as a representative of Korean women, that she is essentially acting out explicit sexual scenes for the foreign market, even if fictional, presumably in exchange for greater access to or acceptance within said market, it can be seen as deeply antithetical to the cultural values of Korea proper and degrading as it comes to the generally positive cultural exchange greater Hallyu attempts to export internationally through its other Hallyu pillars.
To put it bluntly, in such a sensitive cultural framework, Jennie can be seen as having essentially sold herself to foreign interests in a debasing context for monetary gain or favor. This is not something positive, and can be seen as shameful from such a cultural exchange perspective.
Thus explains the harsh of criticism she has underwent for her actions.
In contrast, and to bring it back to the initial post's comparison to the actions of Eunbi or others, their domestic performances simply do not carry the same cultural implications and reputational sensitivities.
They are presumably given more leeway.
U really typed this huh
-
Display More
To my assessment there is an underlying difference between the two.
Eunbi's performance took place at a Korean festival in Korea attended by Koreans. While on the more provocative and sexual side, it still perhaps falls within the spectrum of tolerated behavior. In such a context some idols can get away with more provocative sexual displays, as it's in house (i.e. for Korea). Think Sunmi, etc.
In contrast, Jennie is performing for a foreign audience. Not Korea. This carries with it different reputational and cultural expectations and implications. Such a blatant sexual display for foreigners carries much more pronounced expectations and weight as it comes to how she is seen to represent Korea in a foreign context, what values she is projecting, and how that reflects on Korea. There's much more responsibility there for her to uphold a standard that does not debase or compromise herself, and in turn, her homeland.
As perhaps the single most prominent current Korean female representing Korea abroad, Jennie is effectively the international face of Korean feminine cultural identity. She represents not just herself, not just BLACKPINK, but Korea as a nation and the ethos it wishes to project through its manifestation of Hallyu abroad.
Within such a context, as a role model and cultural representative for Korea and in particular as a representative of Korean women, that she is essentially acting out explicit sexual scenes for the foreign market, even if fictional, presumably in exchange for greater access to or acceptance within said market, it can be seen as deeply antithetical to the cultural values of Korea proper and degrading as it comes to the generally positive cultural exchange greater Hallyu attempts to export internationally through its other Hallyu pillars.
To put it bluntly, in such a sensitive cultural framework, Jennie can be seen as having essentially sold herself to foreign interests in a debasing context for monetary gain or favor. This is not something positive, and can be seen as shameful from such a cultural exchange perspective.
Thus explains the harsh of criticism she has underwent for her actions.
In contrast, and to bring it back to the initial post's comparison to the actions of Eunbi or others, their domestic performances simply do not carry the same cultural implications and reputational sensitivities.
They are presumably given more leeway.
This reasoning might be valid for the tiniest fraction of nationalistic weirdos.
The reality is though that Jennie, Blackpink and Blinks have more haters and antis than Eunbi. It's really that simple.
-
Eunbi. Mother.
Mother. Eunbi.
-
Display More
To my assessment there is an underlying difference between the two.
Eunbi's performance took place at a Korean festival in Korea attended by Koreans. While on the more provocative and sexual side, it still perhaps falls within the spectrum of tolerated behavior. In such a context some idols can get away with more provocative sexual displays, as it's in house (i.e. for Korea). Think Sunmi, etc.
In contrast, Jennie is performing for a foreign audience. Not Korea. This carries with it different reputational and cultural expectations and implications. Such a blatant sexual display for foreigners carries much more pronounced expectations and weight as it comes to how she is seen to represent Korea in a foreign context, what values she is projecting, and how that reflects on Korea. There's much more responsibility there for her to uphold a standard that does not debase or compromise herself, and in turn, her homeland.
As perhaps the single most prominent current Korean female representing Korea abroad, Jennie is effectively the international face of Korean feminine cultural identity. She represents not just herself, not just BLACKPINK, but Korea as a nation and the ethos it wishes to project through its manifestation of Hallyu abroad.
Within such a context, as a role model and cultural representative for Korea and in particular as a representative of Korean women, that she is essentially acting out explicit sexual scenes for the foreign market, even if fictional, presumably in exchange for greater access to or acceptance within said market, it can be seen as deeply antithetical to the cultural values of Korea proper and degrading as it comes to the generally positive cultural exchange greater Hallyu attempts to export internationally through its other Hallyu pillars.
To put it bluntly, in such a sensitive cultural framework, Jennie can be seen as having essentially sold herself to foreign interests in a debasing context for monetary gain or favor. This is not something positive, and can be seen as shameful from such a cultural exchange perspective.
Thus explains the harsh of criticism she has underwent for her actions.
In contrast, and to bring it back to the initial post's comparison to the actions of Eunbi or others, their domestic performances simply do not carry the same cultural implications and reputational sensitivities.
They are presumably given more leeway.
Sold herself to foreign interests? Lol even as a man i can see this is some shit.
-
. She literally is mother to her 
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
