Pitchfork Review of Arirang (real this time)

  • See4VeM.jpeg


    There’s a lot riding on the sensational K-pop group’s first album in four years, but its generic songs ring hollow and lack the vim and vigor of the band’s best work.


    The most fascinating song on ARIRANG features little more than 98 seconds of silence. Named “No. 29” after South Korea’s 29th designated national treasure, it is a field recording of the Sacred Bell of King Seongdeok. Legend has it that the bell wouldn’t ring until a child was cast into the bronze; its sound is said to resemble an ancient word for “mom.”


    BTS are a lot like this child, sacrificing themselves for their mother country. Stated less romantically, it is impossible to read about the boy band without hearing of their many record-setting accomplishments, their importance in propagating Korean soft power, and in broadcasting something uniquely and impressively Korean to the rest of the world. ARIRANG is the group’s first album in four years—a gap caused by mandatory military conscription—and coincides with a Netflix-streamed concert at Gwanghwamun Square. Even President Lee Jae Myung chimed in: “We hope it will be a meaningful time to share the beauty of our cultural heritage and the appeal of K-culture.”


    Given all this, ARIRANG’s generic pop music does in some sense represent one facet of broader Korean culture: the desire for Western validation and global dominance. There are numerous non-Korean producers and singer-songwriters throughout the album, and while this isn’t something unusual for a K-pop release, there’s plenty of overlap with those who made JENNIE’s sleek solo debut Ruby, most notably Diplo. But these songs don’t sound the least bit assured, partly because their sonic elements recontextualize them in the world of Western rap (fashion-rap cornball Teezo Touchdown has credits, as does JPEGMAFIA). Mike WiLL Made-It offers a throwaway beat on “Aliens,” the production lumbering around as members rap and chant in routine fashion. “FYA” flirts with the idea of pop-rap Jersey club but is noxiously self-serious, its half-energetic verve deadened by its Auto-Tune slurry.


    A lot of these early tracks on ARIRANG harken back to the group’s first rap songs, but one of the only successes here is “Hooligan,” setting a sweeping and chopped-up string arrangement against clashing swords. The beat’s contrasting elements befit the whiplash in vocal deliveries: RM gives off a cartoonish villain laugh while V and Jimin deliver soaring vocals. While BTS’s rapping usually incorporates a dated style of aggression and braggadocio, the fire in the delivery was often enough. Songs like “2.0” and “they don’t know ’bout us” instead sound sleepy, as if the members are just clocking in at the Biggest Band in the World factory. What remains in a lot of these tracks, then, are dazzling little ornaments. On “One More Night,” it’s the plinking Korg M1 synth melody that flits atop an anodyne beat with ’90s house flair. On “Into the Sun,” it’s the audaciousness of the vocoder-drenched vocals. On “No. 29,” it’s just the bell; a flourish with purpose.


    The final two-thirds of ARIRANG are more pop-friendly but no less banal. Tame Impala’s Kevin Parker offers yet another diluted vision of psychedelic rock on “Merry Go Round,” everything loping around as a nondescript haze. “NORMAL” is a gauzy ballad whose hook is laughably clunky, its lyrics delivered with unearned pomp. Most damning is “Like Animals,” a pop-rock ballad that recalls the group’s best single, “Spring Day.” The major difference here is how the vocals lack pathos, the key element that elevates BTS’s songs beyond mid-level, market-tested pop production. Sometimes, all a song needs to do is make you believe in something—love, transcendence, yourself—but ARIRANG’s messages repeatedly ring hollow, like birthday emails from a mega corporation.


    The only full-length song on ARIRANG that meaningfully grapples with its intended thematic concepts of Korean cultural identity is opener “Body to Body.” Atop rolling beats, RM asks fans to jump while Suga declares, “B-T-uh, from everywhere to Korea.” Its climactic bridge incorporates a moving rendition of “Arirang,” the country’s most famous traditional folk song. As clanging percussion and stirring vocal harmonies resound, their message is clear: Everyone’s looking at us, which means they’re looking at Korea.

    But that message carries a weird, even depressing undertone. “Arirang” has long functioned as a polysemic anthem—of deep longing, collective resilience, even the reunification of North and South Korea. For an album this vacuous to wave “Arirang” as a banner of triumph makes any pride feel empty—an embrace of “good enough” as a national identity. With so much weight on their shoulders and money to be made, BTS could only crumble under the pressure. ARIRANG is the sound of their collapse.


  • im proud of Minsoo or whatever his name is to stand on business and maintaining integrity.


    even he knew to not risk his credibility by giving arirang anything above 5. (and it's probably mostly driven by the high level team behind because the execution/overal production was the weakest part in this album)


    yet im still pretty sure they made the rating the less abrasive possible because by pitchfork standarts, better albums have gotten below 4/10 rating...


    btw, IZM the korean equivalent also gave it a similar score. 2.5/5.


    External Content x.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • the short version:


    External Content x.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    :meme-oop:


    he clocked tho :pepe-tea:

  • Nah. Im not here for the Like Animals slander. :pepe-cop:


    In seriousness, I enjoyed the album and I see what they're wanna trying to do with the 1st and 2nd half but at the same time I see why it will get mixed or negative reactions.

  • Lol I saw a tweet from him a few days ago about how he was going to lower BTS's review score of 89, like this dude was chomping at the bit to give it scathing review. At least his hate for BTS has been consistent over the years despite their hiatus ^^

    he's obviously pissed that bts is the most popular kpop group, he's always been. "the sound of collapse". yes, bts is collapsing. they sell less albums and cannot sell out stadiums. how can anyone take him seriously is beyond me

  • Lol I saw a tweet from him a few days ago about how he was going to lower BTS's review score of 89, like this dude was chomping at the bit to give it scathing review. At least his hate for BTS has been consistent over the years despite their hiatus ^^

    He said this before starting to work in the album btw...

    A clown


    The best part is how he is part of certain salty fandom... pathetic is the only word that describes the meltdown they have been having since Arirang debut

  • 5.3 is not really a low score by pitchfork's standard. Most kpop albums fall between 5-6.


    All critics should use full range of score, instead of just 7-10 range.

    They've given a lot of 5s from what I've seen. A lot of critics use the the 5 stars rating system. I've only seen few that uses the 100.

  • $3.50

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    :meme-bonk:

  • It's not a bad score and Pitchfork has a much tougher grading scale compared to other outlets. They usually rate kpop albums between 5.0-7.0. Not a fan of the reviewer for how he attacked Lisa and wanted to agitate fans with how he conducted himself. I still don't think people should lose any sleep over the review because it's just how the outlet is because they're tough critics and they've rated many popular non-kpop albums with questionable scores.


    Here are some of their scores for kpop projects


    1. Seo Taiji and Boys - Seo Taiji and Boys (1992) — 83

    2. NewJeans - Get Up (2023) — 76

    3. Effie - pullup to busan 4 morE hypEr summEr it’s gonna be a f***in moviE EP (2025) — 76

    4. Red Velvet - The ReVe Festival 2022 – Feel My Rhythm (2022) — 74

    5. 2NE1 - CRUSH (2014) — 73

    6. f(x) - 4 Walls (2015) — 73

    7. TWICE - Taste of Love (2021) — 73

    8. Girls’ Generation - FOREVER 1 (2022) — 72

    9. Jennie - Rubie (2025) — 71

    10. BTS - Love Yourself 轉 ‘Tear’ (2018) — 71

    11. BTS - BE (2020) — 70

    12. The Deep - KPOP B!TCH (2025) — 67

    13. Red Velvet - Queendom (2021) — 67

    14. BLACKPINK - BORN PINK (2022) — 65

    15. BTS - MAP OF THE SOUL : 7 (2020) — 63

    16. BLACKPINK - KILL THIS LOVE (2019) — 62

    17. BTS - MAP OF THE SOUL : PERSONA (2019) — 61

    18. G-DRAGON - COUP D’ETAT (2013) — 61

    19. BLACKPINK - DEADLINE (2026) —57

    20. ITZY - GUESS WHO (2021) — 55

    21. Rosé - Rosie (2024) — 55

    22. BTS - ARIRANG (2026) - 53

    23. Lisa - Alter Ego (2025) — 52

  • The real tea is whether or not fans brought up these scores back when their older albums were higher rated than their latest albums and use it as a flex


    Because it would be funny for them to do so in the past and boast and flex about it, while at the same time shitting on the credibility of it now when the score is much lower

  • Totally respect this review. Everyone is entitled to love and hate this album. He absolutely hated it. His choice. NME just came out with their review and gave it 4 out of 5 stars. It may be a case of loving the old style of BTS or going on this journey post military break with some new sounds.


  • From the list another user posted above, BTS has 2 albums scored more than 7.0, which is not bad in any way.

  • Totally respect this review.

    I don't.

    The first half is a confused, foundering waste of word count that says absolutely nothing.

    Let's break it down.

    Quote

    BTS are a lot like this child, sacrificing themselves for their mother country. Stated less romantically, it is impossible to read about the boy band without hearing of their many record-setting accomplishments, their importance in propagating Korean soft power [...]

    Where is the sacrifice? The point the writer is trying to make is, at best, implicit. He could cycle back to this at the end (IE: that BTS sacrificed their own identity for the sake of perceived national interest), but doesn't. The analogy is brought up here, never actually made concrete or explained, and then forgotten entirely.

    Quote

    Given all this, ARIRANG’s generic pop music does in some sense represent one facet of broader Korean culture: the desire for Western validation and global dominance.

    I will accept bleating about "western validation" when it comes to individual groups but I don't think attributing it to an entire culture is remotely acceptable unless you belong to that culture. And no, being an American of Korean descent does not give you the right to make a statement like this.

    Maybe it's true, maybe it isn't. Maybe this guy lives in Seoul, maybe he doesn't. I know one thing though: A review of a music album is not the place to take a shot at an entire fucking country.

    But this is the same outlet that gave a Sonic Youth album 0/10 because the writer felt some type of way about New Yorkers so I guess editorial standards started in the gutter.

    (keep in mind: the founder and former editor of this site once wrote an incredibly racist review of a jazz album in which he imitated stereotypical African American speech starting sentences like: "Shit, cat")


    Next:

    Quote

    There are numerous non-Korean producers and singer-songwriters throughout the album, and while this isn’t something unusual for a K-pop release, there’s plenty of overlap with those who made JENNIE’s sleek solo debut Ruby, most notably Diplo.

    What is the writer trying to say here?

    Imagine reviewing the latest album by the Deftones with:

    "There are a lot of guitars on this album, which is not unusual for a rock album."

    I would suggest that if something is usual for a genre, it doesn't need to be mentioned in your fucking review.

    But maybe he's going somewhere with this? Maybe I should let him cook?

    Quote

    But these songs don’t sound the least bit assured, partly because their sonic elements recontextualize them in the world of Western rap (fashion-rap cornball Teezo Touchdown has credits, as does JPEGMAFIA).

    Well, he starts off with "But" but this sentence has nothing to do with the previous, really, does it?


    The rest is fine, but I dispute the description of the album as being "generic pop" - it absolutely isn't that, and is in particular less generic than the other k-pop album the guy mentions in this same review. I also don't think Arirang has much to do with "Western rap", especially modern rap. The writer even sort of concedes this by calling their rapping "dated".


    Even through translation, IZM provide a much better negativeish review of this album. As you might expect, because they actually know what they're talking about.

  • if the album reviews are negative it's bc the author is a certified hater. if the album reviews are positive it's bc the author is a stan. :pepe-clown-gear:


    no one will ever be happy ;judgingpepe:

    He said that bts invented garbage music. Why would i care what the guy say. At least he can be professional and keep it to himself


    I have no issues with people not liking the album, certain number of armys were disappointed but i cannot take this guy seriously

  • He said that bts invented garbage music. Why would i care what the guy say. At least he can be professional and keep it to himself


    I have no issues with people not liking the album, certain number of armys were disappointed but i cannot take this guy seriously

    Isn't pitchfork a group of people or it's just that dude? Or is he the one in charge of kpop reviews?


    Anyways, pitchfork has always seemed too nitpicky and always gatekeeping good scores on purpose just to give off some "prestigious" vibe.

  • Isn't pitchfork a group of people or it's just that dude? Or is he the one in charge of kpop reviews?


    Anyways, pitchfork has always seemed too nitpicky and always gatekeeping good scores on purpose just to give off some "prestigious" vibe.

    Group of people. BP album was reviewed by other person (that got higher score, i think 5.7). But he always review bts. If you want to sound credible how about use language that suits credible critics


  • NewJeans and Effie in the top 3 tho!


    (I’m a fan of Seo Taiji too)

  • NewJeans and Effie in the top 3 tho!


    (I’m a fan of Seo Taiji too)

    It's wild that Effie has the highest rated modern kpop project on Pitchfork. I was also shocked they reviewed hers and The Deep's projects. It feels like you have to be in the underground in kpop to check out those projects and review it on a major publication. I hope they review more kpop projects because it gives artist visibility and it's always interesting to see wha different views on projects. I would like to see them rate groups like tripleS, Artms, Qwer, Heize, Yerin Baek, Rescene, etc. Yerin Baek's last project would've been a very interesting review to read because itw as lowkey an album of the year contender


    I was going over some reviews and found this article where they rescored some albums. Wow they got some albums very wrong :sweat:


    OqWXCtx.png

  • oh, look, it's him again. why would anyone care about what this guy thinks is beyond me.

    I have a better question: Why would anyone care about anyone?


    Just because someone is a paid journalist doesn't mean they're spitting facts. It's just another opinion, the only difference is that compared to you and most people on the planet, they're paid to say things.


    The funny thing about people in general is they think a positive review is FACT and the negative one is just HATE.


    Neither is fact, just opinions.


    Also, a 5-6/10 rating basically means AVERAGE. That's not even a bad score.

  • Totally respect this review. Everyone is entitled to love and hate this album. He absolutely hated it. His choice. NME just came out with their review and gave it 4 out of 5 stars. It may be a case of loving the old style of BTS or going on this journey post military break with some new sounds.

    Exactly.


    Also, maybe it's just me, but I hate the 5 star reviews, because for me the 10 star version is much more accurate because I have more options.

  • This thread contains 34 more posts that have been hidden for guests, please register yourself or login to continue reading.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!