A first I thought it was about the lolita controversy.. I suppose they aren't willing to address it

Quote from xPaulettex

So basically if you say, I don’t like New Jeans you’re in the batch suits. Lolo wow are they self conscious much

i think it's more like if you accuse mhj of being a pedophile you're in the batch suits

i mean, she has every right to sue people who are basically insinuating she's a pedo over things that don't really prove that. that whole controversy really did damage her image. but it's also true her subsequent actions haven't done her any good.

i just think its dumb for people to hide behind "its just a discussion" "we're giving valid criticism" when yall were rlly just calling her a pedo in broad daylight. js!

Good

If you are gonna accuse/insinuate that somone is a pedo, on of the most heinous crimes there is, you better have real proof of it. False accusations like that can ruin a persons life.

Quote

Post 2: "Wow... Just got a call from the police. Apparently Min Hee Jin is filing a batch of lawsuits over theqoo comments. They told me to come in; I've never experienced something like this. I didn't write any swear words and deleted my comment after I posted it...."

Post 3: "I didn't write any swears either. Even the police I spoke to said this was an awkward situation. As long as anyone wrote anything slightly negative on theqoo, she's suing them. I deleted mine not long after I posted it so I don't even remember what I wrote."

I wonder why they felt they had to delete their posts afterward if they didnt write anything bad as they say..

Quote from 0ppar

Considering all the stuff she has on her house, can you really blame them.

Yes, that's why are being sued.

I bet plenty of allkpop/reddit useres are breathing a big sigh of relief none of them are in korea lol

Lol she doesn’t think she’s done anything wrong that’s the problem here. She’s not a pedo but cookie was indeed creepy and her lolita aesthetics infatuation was indeed creepy. She pretended that the song was about making cookies like as if everyone was born yesterday and completely glossed over Instagram or whatever feed that was exposed

Gaslighting at its finest

Level : min hee jin

min heejin isn't that..hidden anti feminist...

So MHJ is wasting the money that HYBE made off BTS to sue every single time she is crticized. Yet HYBE was crickets when BTS was attacked viciously over enlistment (Jin stated that he was sad about getting attacked for it even though he was planning to enlist), Jimin's health premiums issue, Jimin being doxxed, etc. Etc. MHJ will be the downfall of HYBE along with Scooter. I hope BTS jumps ship instead of going down with it.

Quote from 0ppar

South Korea has draconian defamation laws where you can get sued/punished even if what you said was factually true.

According to Article 307 of South Korea’s Criminal Act, a person who publicly reveals facts that are damaging to another person is subject to punishment. Even if the statement is true, Article 310 of the Criminal Act specifies that a person is exonerated from defamation only if these facts are true and solely for the interest of the public.

https://keia.org/the-peninsula…th-koreas-defamation-law/

while i disagree with having draconian laws, ignorance of those laws doesn't excuse the citizens actually living there.

I mean if someone has a lolita wallboard like that and then they go onto posting about it on IG, anybody would find it weird. It's not them hating for whatever reason. SK's defamation laws are so shit for protecting rich ppl from all sorts of criticism, even when they deserve getting criticism for it.

Lol. This is so fucked up.

Quote from 0ppar

South Korea has draconian defamation laws where you can get sued/punished even if what you said was factually true.

According to Article 307 of South Korea’s Criminal Act, a person who publicly reveals facts that are damaging to another person is subject to punishment. Even if the statement is true, Article 310 of the Criminal Act specifies that a person is exonerated from defamation only if these facts are true and solely for the interest of the public.

https://keia.org/the-peninsula…th-koreas-defamation-law/

This law is always brought up as some sort of gatcha.

When was the last time a celebrity went to court or won a defamation case for something that was proven true ?

This is a law common in many countries over the world, all scandinavian countries for example have similar laws regarding defamation.

Key here is "true and solely for the interest of the public", there are numerous thing that might be true, but not illegal, or have any business in being exposed in public.

As an example for why the law exists (not comparing it in anway to this situation or other common when celebrites are involved), a man is revelead to have been sexually assulted by several other men, the victims face and name is made public against his will, and its used to mock him, something that will follow him for the rest of his life. The assault is true, and so is the defamation/slander/libel.