Elligible. Doesn't mean they will be nominated, right? But this is cool enough ig 
Wut????????????????????????????
Cramp in my finger…
???????????????
Elligible. Doesn't mean they will be nominated, right? But this is cool enough ig
External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
bp and twice being senior groups...............
but seriously, what is grammys requirments for new artist? Like how is a 5/6 year old group eligible? They aren't new.
Wut????????????????????????????
Cramp in my finger…
???????????????
Grammy sunbaenim notice them.
Lemme just…
7A16AC6E-F9DF-4EA8-935C-C5D57B868950.gif
Just a little bit, then I calm down…
7A16AC6E-F9DF-4EA8-935C-C5D57B868950.gif7A16AC6E-F9DF-4EA8-935C-C5D57B868950.gif7A16AC6E-F9DF-4EA8-935C-C5D57B868950.gif7A16AC6E-F9DF-4EA8-935C-C5D57B868950.gif7A16AC6E-F9DF-4EA8-935C-C5D57B868950.gif7A16AC6E-F9DF-4EA8-935C-C5D57B868950.gif
.
I don’t know Monsta X that much. Did they released English song too?
The fact that TXT is so much younger then the other groups makes me happy.
Yes, so far I know, monsta x also released English song.
Yes. They released a full English album a couple of years ago.
Sounds like the Grammys are getting desperate since their ratings tanked a lot recently. Hoping to bait some fans into thinking they might get nominated to boost social media engagement and up the interest.
Currently it appears to be based on when the artist has had a "breakthrough" into the mainstream American music scene.
So basically this is how it was explained for Lizzo to win Best New Artist (with a song that came out in 2017).
From Billboard
QuoteDisplay MoreThere's just one hitch: Lizzo may not technically qualify. She may have released too much product prior to Oct. 1, 2018 -- the start of the current eligibility year.
The Grammys' Category Description Guide plainly states: "The artist must have released, as a featured performing artist, a minimum of five singles/tracks or one album, but not more than thirty singles/tracks or three albums prior to the current eligibility year."
Lizzo had released two previous albums, two EPs and two collaborative mixtapes prior to the start of the current eligibility year. If you add up all the tracks from those releases, you're over 30.
But the Grammys have a little wiggle room. They sometimes don't count releases that were on small independent labels on the grounds that that didn't really allow the artist a fair chance at breaking through. Lizzo's 2013 debut album, Lizzobangers, was released on Totally Gross National Product. (It was re-released in 2014 on Virgin.) Her 2015 sophomore album, Big Grrrl Small World, was released on BGSW -- an acronym for the album title.
The Recording Academy may employ this loophole to let Lizzo compete for a nom this year. (The Academy does not comment on eligibility questions until the ballot is finalized.)
I would assume that based on this "small independent label" loophole that the Grammys can pick and choose what to accept and that Korean based entertainment companies probably fall into that.
none of them will get nominated
Currently it appears to be based on when the artist has had a "breakthrough" into the mainstream American music scene.
I see. Even with only 1 English song?
Sounds like the Grammys are getting desperate since their ratings tanked a lot recently. Hoping to bait some fans into thinking they might get nominated to boost social media engagement and up the interest.
This is what I'm thinking honestly, none of the K-pop groups are making any sort of major moves other than BTS BP and recently TWICE. I'm looking at this article with skepticism especially since moas are already going crazy in the qrts. The american music business isn't gonna give txt the time of day, I'm 99% sure.
SNSD is also eligible to be nominated for Grammys Best New Artist
Also for what it's worth... the Grammys don't actually care what category you submit for. If they don't want to nominate you, then they won't nominate you in that category and will actually move you if they want. I believe that was an issue for Justin Bieber last year because he submitted his album for Best R&B Album and they moved it to Best Pop Album even though he didn't submit it there.
none of them will get nominated
Of course they won't, it's an obvious attempt to get kpop fans to rally even more twitter #s for them.
They see blinks every year spamming tags and every year they get no nominations. Kpop fans are so easily manipulated that even the mention of eligibility will make them spam. Desperate attempt to claw back some relevance with international youth music fans since most USA fans don't care about them at all anymore.
Also for what it's worth... the Grammys don't actually care what category you submit for. If they don't want to nominate you, then they won't nominate you in that category and will actually move you if they want. I believe that was an issue for Justin Bieber last year because he submitted his album for Best R&B Album and they moved it to Best Pop Album even though he didn't submit it there.
Grammys sounds weird.
none of them will get nominated
You know that's right.
I think all of these groups have American labels (does TXT?) and most labels will literally submit anything and everything they can. None of these labels will put enough money behind the consideration campaigns for these groups to get them nominated and they aren't break out enough to warrant some old record exec to vote for them based on the fact that he remembers hearing their name a lot.
Currently it appears to be based on when the artist has had a "breakthrough" into the mainstream American music scene.
well, why call it new artist then?
Sounds like the Grammys are getting desperate since their ratings tanked a lot recently. Hoping to bait some fans into thinking they might get nominated to boost social media engagement and up the interest.
Billboard published the news though, not the Grammys (The recording Academy). And eligibility is eligibility. Lots of people are eligible every year.
You know that's right.
I think all of these groups have American labels (does TXT?) and most labels will literally submit anything and everything they can. None of these labels will put enough money behind the consideration campaigns for these groups to get them nominated and they aren't break out enough to warrant some old record exec to vote for them based on the fact that he remembers hearing their name a lot.
Yeah they are with Republic
Grammys sounds weird.
They are. It's all money related. The Recording Academy is biased and petty. They will punish you for not playing ball with them. They screwed The Weeknd over last year and didn't nominate him at all because he chose to perform at the Super Bowl instead of the Grammys (I believe they happened in the same week). He had the biggest pop album in the country by far and they didn't even nominate him.
Now he's refusing to submit for awards and honestly more people should do the same... specifically artists of color and especially women of color.
They are. It's all money related. The Recording Academy is biased and petty. They will punish you for not playing ball with them. They screwed The Weeknd over last year and didn't nominate him at all because he chose to perform at the Super Bowl instead of the Grammys (I believe they happened in the same week). He had the biggest pop album in the country by far and they didn't even nominate him.
Now he's refusing to submit for awards and honestly more people should do the same... specifically artists of color and especially women of color.
They're so shady ew.... 
well, why call it new artist then?
Because they can't come up with anything better. The actual description is "For a new artist who releases, during the Eligibility Year, the first recording which establishes the public identity of that artist." which is extremely vague.
It mostly exists imo because as independent and self-published albums because more and more common place and as larger record labels sign these artists and they suddenly break into the public music scene, they want them to be nominated. Basically every time there's buzz about why a person didn't get nominated they change the rules.
Like Lady Gaga caused a rule change because her label wanted her nominated in 2010 because Bad Romance was her big breakthrough, but at the time you couldn't be nominated for Best New Artist if you had been nominated for a Grammy before. She got nominated for either Just Dance or Poker Face in one of the smaller categories before so they got rid of that rule the next year.
Billboard published the news though, not the Grammys (The recording Academy). And eligibility is eligibility. Lots of people are eligible every year.
It's the grammys that set the criteria for eligibility and this must have changed recently since in years prior TWICE hasn't been eligible.
Convenient that the soft power of Asia is likely the fastest growing in the world and at the same time USA viewership of the show dropped by record highs last year.
Call me a cynic but I'm not so easily took. They want those engagements and kpop twitter is already giving it to them in ways very few, if any, western artist fans ever will and in today's world things like that are more valuable than they are given credit for.
They are. It's all money related. The Recording Academy is biased and petty. They will punish you for not playing ball with them. They screwed The Weeknd over last year and didn't nominate him at all because he chose to perform at the Super Bowl instead of the Grammys (I believe they happened in the same week). He had the biggest pop album in the country by far and they didn't even nominate him.
Now he's refusing to submit for awards and honestly more people should do the same... specifically artists of color and especially women of color.
Grammy was the award what had controversy about their nominees last year?
They sounds so shady. Wtf. That explains the above comment.
It's the grammys that set the criteria for eligibility and this must have changed recently since in years prior TWICE hasn't been eligible.
Convenient that the soft power of Asia is likely the fastest growing in the world and at the same time USA viewership of the show dropped by record highs last year.
Call me a cynic but I'm not so easily took. They want those engagements and kpop twitter is already giving it to them in ways very few, if any, western artist fans ever will and in today's world things like that are more valuable than they are given credit for.
Well, they've always had a rule that the song be available commercially in the US. Have Twice actually marketed a song here before? Genuinely asking.
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
but I'm a simple person, TXT 
era! This week has just really upped the stakes. Good thing MOAs take all of this clownery in stride- just another day at the 
