IS PITCHFORK PROUD OF THIS MAN???
-
I laughed
Like yeah, so professional!! Small dick energy like all the BP haters!!! 🤏🏻🤏🏻🤏🏻🤏🏻
-
I laughed
Like yeah, so professional!! Small dick energy like all the BP haters!!! 🤏🏻🤏🏻🤏🏻🤏🏻
Grown man being a BP anti...
-
Grown man being a BP anti...
But it's the grown ones who are being hateful, literally moms of teens, adult men with jobs like... What a hobby
-
-
Grown man being a BP anti...
I'd like to say we have at least two supposedly "grown men" BP anti's here at AKP.
But... the two I'm thinking of aren't really men, just yappy, whiny lil boys. -
Being biased doesn't make him "incapable." Everyone has biases. Should he be reviewing artists he feels this strongly about? Probably not, but at least he didn't include these takes in his reviews. They're social media posts.
-
Damn didn't know David worked for Pitchfork
Cool
-
Being biased doesn't make him "incapable." Everyone has biases. Should he be reviewing artists he feels this strongly about? Probably not, but at least he didn't include these takes in his reviews. They're social media posts.
You can have some biases but not show them so openly
A journalist should be objective
Even if this takes are only on his social media he just make him lose a lot of credibility as a journalist cuz people can obviously see that if he's harsh on some people it's not because he really think the album was bad
But it's just a personal attack that he's taking at them and hiding it behind the "objectivity" of a music review
If i was a media and had a journalist doing this type of comment and hurting the credibility of the post i make on my website or journal i would fire him directly
-
-
-
Display More
You can have some biases but not show them so openly
A journalist should be objective
Even if this takes are only on his social media he just make him lose a lot of credibility as a journalist cuz people can obviously see that if he's harsh on some people it's not because he really think the album was bad
But it's just a personal attack that he's taking at them and hiding it behind the "objectivity" of a music review
If i was a media and had a journalist doing this type of comment and hurting the credibility of the post i make on my website or journal i would fire him directly
Except both of these "personal attacks" are what he thinks of the albums in question. It's entirely possible he just thinks the albums are bad. Like I said, maybe he shouldn't be reviewing their albums. But at the same time, this isn't jury duty. If you have to find someone who's completely unbiased one way or another towards a particular artist to write your outlet's reviews, you could run out of potential reviewers fast.
-
-
I mean, Born Pink wasn't very good, so they're not wrong to express that
-
When I read that As If It's Your Last has 'country' genre mixed I stopped taking it seriously
-
As soon as Pitchfork gave Ice Spice a 7.6, they lost all credibility. Then gave Kendrick a 6.6. They went right in the trash.
Music is mostly subjective. If you are not talking about the technical aspects of a song, then your objectivity is already lost.
I'm still bumping Rock Star, New Woman, and FUTW like my life depends on it whether you like it or not MINSOO!
-
there was a post on another platform saying that pitfork reviews are low especially about Kpop artists as they are biased, but I didn't know the author went out of their way to purposely write a negative review. That only shows we shouldn't take pitforks seriously.
-
It's okay if they rate an album low but I dislike when they hate so openly. If you are a critic then it's important to show respect no matter what. You have to make points with the knowledge that you will rate a human and your rating will or might affect their reception. If a professional critic can't behave then who can? It shoudln't be personal, you have power over the audience with such a big platform and you have to do the right thing in the right way. Be negative if you have to but be professional and respectful about it.
-
The insta real was NASTY man
. that sh*t was PERSONAL 
. -
It's okay if they rate an album low but I dislike when they hate so openly. If you are a critic then it's important to show respect no matter what. You have to make points with the knowledge that you will rate a human and your rating will or might affect their reception. If a professional critic can't behave then who can? It shoudln't be personal, you have power over the audience with such a big platform and you have to do the right thing in the right way. Be negative if you have to but be professional and respectful about it.
exactly, we actually need a real and unbiased critique because for me this one doesn't count. if they have a personal vendetta against an aritist/group they should decline and let someone else do the critique.
-
This is why we need to avoid putting these articles or reviews on a pedestal just because they come from Pitchfork, Billboard, or whatever. Not every writer is credible even if they have the backing of these sources. They're simply people, sometimes with personal agendas.
We have users here who are more reliable for an unbiased, nuanced review.
-
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
