[theqoo] [EXCLUSIVE] SINGER IU, ACCUSED OF PLAGIARIZING 6 SONGS INCLUDING 'THE RED SHOES'


  • [theqoo] [EXCLUSIVE] SINGER IU, ACCUSED OF PLAGIARIZING 6 SONGS INCLUDING 'THE RED SHOES'


    AVvXsEj4or0pvkGeU9jbjQXGkrQk6-zOXeWxKsYGqVfI_SLtknsIReQymxN6ZyQ9zObnU1JzLazkTRcWvMGWasToQJQhtTLbQg6g7NjWKUVOABLfB7CrWZUxGR2VdtwHSc3c1TeDYl8UndxhGN34aQGbh58zOPa7ERSijFtFmhV-UqIOvgb-MXEilJrufuPf=s16000


    According to an exclusive media outlet report on May 10 KST, an anonymous individual 'A' has filed charges against singer IU for plagiarism.


    Earlier this week on May 8, Seoul's Gangnam Police Station received a charge report filed against IU, who is facing accusations of plagiarizing 6 songs - "Good Day", "The Red Shoes", "Pitiful", "Boo", "BBIBBI", and "Celebrity".


    The charge report claimed, "All 6 of these songs closely resemble the original songs in melody, rhythm, and code progression, and in the case of songs like 'The Red Shoes', the resemblance is clearly noticeable even in the ears of the general public. Especially, all 6 songs are suspected of plagiarizing the intro."


    It's true that back in 2013, when IU first released "The Red Shoes", she became embroiled in plagiarism accusations for the song's close resemblance to "Here's Us" by the German band Nekta.


    The accuser 'A' further claimed that "The accused (IU) refused to respond to her plagiarism accusations despite their numerous occurrences, instead reporting and erasing all such accusations on SNS for copyright violations. Therefore, the accuser has decided to file a report after witnessing a lack of public awareness regarding the numerous accounts of plagiarism which have been taken down irrationally on SNS for copyright reasons, and additionally as an issue of a failure of legal authorities to fulfill their duties responsibly in determining the amount of damages that those faced with copyright violation accusations must pay."


    While normally, plagiarism charges must be filed by those who believe themselves to be the victims of creative plagiarism, in the case of 'A', they intend on claiming that third parties can also file charges based on suspicions of "habitual acts of plagiarism for profit".
    CR: Allkpop


    source: https://www.mk.co.kr/news/society/10732469


    original post: here


    1. This is f*cking random, IU fighting


    2. Is this a resurgence of Tajinyo..? I'm looking at a fake scandal again... crazy


    3.It's not even because they are similar to the original songs, it's because they speed up the music, adjust the pitch, and make it sound as similar as possible, and then call it plagiarism;;


    4. This person should just work hard living their own life. Imagine how jealous theey must beㅋㅋ


    5. This is a legandary troll. Leave IU alone ㅠㅠ


    6. IU's trolls are just of another level. Use that hate energy on your own life or something


    7. IU is a strong and good person so I think that she'll manage this well. The people around her will protect her too ㅇㅇ


    8. This person is a commoner?


    9. Charging someone is different from accusing someone. Charges come from the people involved while accusations come from 3rd parties


    10. Those aren't even songs that IU composed anywaysㅋㅋㅋㅋ



    [theqoo] [EXCLUSIVE] SINGER IU, ACCUSED OF PLAGIARIZING 6 SONGS INCLUDING 'THE RED SHOES'
    We translate Pann articles about Korean news, music, drama and lifestyle
    www.pannchoa.com

  • I hope it's not true coz that sh*t can end careers especially in Kpop where idol careers can be more fragile than glass.

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • IU have really big backing behind her back and Korea really love her, so this is nothing for her. This is not the first time it happened. If you follow some of her plagiarism accusations, some of it actually can make other artists that not IU sink in the deep hole and kill their careers immediately.

  • This is from a group of antis that been at it for over a year now, claiming she has plagiarzied not 2-3 songs or even 6, but 50 songs, one less belivable than the other. All in all over 70 composers involved in their claims of plagiarizing(among them Suga of bts as an producer of Eight)


    As proof they have posted videos comparing a few seconds snippets for many songs with clearly edited speed/tempo to try to get it to sound as alike as they can. Celebrity they claim copied 6 or 7 different songs or some such.


    Same group of people also claimed IU plagiarized Sully's smile...yes, you read that right, they say IU stole her smile/laugh from Sully.


    The biggest account behind it all on youtbe is a known IU hater who rebranded his channels as an anti plagiarizing channel last year, yet still only posts videos about IU. They have been all over the place posting hate comments on ius youtube and instagram for almost a year, until her label finally took notice a month ago and started deleting comments on her sns.


    It has gained basically zero media coverage despite the trolls attempts to get it into the news (they even started national petition about it at the start of they year that went nowhere of course) because their only goal is to get it into the news and try to hurt IUs reputation. No media would touch it with a teen foot pole based on groundless accusations posted online, because it would open them up to defamation lawsuits immediately. But now with an official police report, they can claim they are just reporting on what was filed at the police without any risk of repercussions.


    This accusation will go nowhere in court because it doesnt fulfill the most basic critiera even, that only the supposedly aggrieved copyright holder can take it to court, and it was never their goal. Their goal has always been to bring IU down trhou any means, and sad to say this will hurt it in some ways, even if false.


    Heres a video going throu some of the claims they've made

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!