Open letter signed by 26 scholars to Disney+ (Asia Pacific) requesting them to reconsider their decision to continue streaming Snowdrop

  • External Content twitter.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • Dear President Luke Kang,

    We are writing to you as scholars of Korea, regarding the Korean drama, Snowdrop (설강화), that has been made available on your streaming service, Disney Plus.

    We are not writing to request that you stop streaming the show. Rather, we write to request that your company seek experts - there are many, well-qualified modern Korean history experts in Korea and all over the world - to carefully examine the historical references made in the show, and consider for yourselves the way those historical references are used. We make this request because we do not believe that Disney Plus as a global platform is aware of the historical and socio-political context in which this show exists, and we believe that platforms should make an informed decision when globally broadcasting a show set in recent, still-relevant Korean history (1987).

    We do not make this request lightly, as we deeply respect any media work’s right to freedom of expression and the use of artistic license. We do not assume there is one single “correct” way to present history. We respect the Korean drama production’s right to create and broadcast fictional stories in Korea, where there are esteemed Korean historians, politicians, and other figures of intellectual authority who can offer their expertise and critique for Korean viewers.[1] However, this is not the case once the show leaves Korean shores and is broadcast to an international audience, an audience that is generally unfamiliar with modern Korean history. Moreover, while we understand the defense that fiction has a right to explore creative narratives, that defense can also feel hollow when a show uses numerous, specific details that reference actual people and incidents from recent history. The historical details contained in the show, in tandem with its place on your far-reaching platform, have raised enough concerns that we write this letter to you asking for thoughtful consideration when distributing the show globally.

    We will not detail in this letter every single one of the concerns, but below are listed two major examples. Most of the articles and sources cited in this letter are in the Korean language, and there is not an abundance of English-language publications on the democratization movement of the 1980s. This is also why we ask that you bring in historians of Modern Korea to consider this issue in depth.

    Point of Concern 1.

    As you may be aware, the show already courted significant controversy in March 2021 when its female lead was named after a prominent female student democracy activist, Cheon Yeong-cho (천영초).[2] Ms. Cheon suffered severe brain damage in an accident some years ago, and is unable to argue on her own behalf, but the use of her (quite unique and unusual) name was highly inappropriate: the show centered a love story between the female lead ‘Yeong-cho’ and a North Korean spy, whereas the real-life Yeong-cho’s actual husband, Jeong Mun-hwa, was arrested[3] and tortured[4] on suspicion of being a communist and a supporter of the North Korean regime. In other words, the drama originally used the name of a victim of anti-communist propaganda in a narrative that actually echoes the propaganda - a narrative that affirms, ‘yes, there are North Korean spies among the students, and the students are too naive to realize this.’ The drama production subsequently decided to change the name Yeong-cho to Yeong-ro. However, this appears to be the only significant change the show decided to make after the controversy in March.

    Even with the name change, the fact remains that people were arrested, tortured,[5] and even killed[6] as suspected communists or spies. The possibility of North Korean spies allowed for terrible human rights abuses, and this red scare was the very excuse used to persuade the general public to accept extreme extrajudicial activity by the government. Lives were lost and families were ruined by the government’s framing of innocent victims as spies or communists. To this day, there are new truths being discovered about victims framed as North Korean spies or communists, as well as court cases seeking to restore the honor of those victims.[7] The main character Soo-ho, the North Korean spy, is shown to have entered Korea under the guise of a student who studied abroad in Germany; in reality, many Korean students who studied in Germany were accused of being North Korean spies, kidnapped to South Korea, and imprisoned.[8] To feature an actual North Korean spy entering Korea by way of Germany and being pursued by South Korean agents in 1987, this drama reframes those tragic circumstances of history toward a justification of authoritarian wrongdoing.

    Point of Concern 2.

    There are other historical references made in this show via its characters that deserve close scrutiny. In particular, we urge the company to examine the character of the female lead’s father, Eun Chang-su (은창수).[9] In the show and in the official character profile provided on the drama website, Eun is defined as a reluctant participant in the authoritarian regime, a conflicted man who - deep down - has good principles. There are two reasons to ask if this is an appropriate portrayal: Firstly, whatever Eun Chang-sus motivations and principles may be in the show, the fact remains that the real-life government agency for which the character serves as director (the ANSP: Agency for National Security Planning, known in Korean as 국가안전기획부/안기부) was historically notorious for extrajudicial power and infamous acts of torture and murder.[10] It is worth asking why the director of such an agency is being portrayed sympathetically, however fictional he may be.

    Secondly, this character shares a striking number of biographical similarities with real-life military officer Park Jun-byeong (박준병), who commanded the 20th Infantry Division into Gwangju in May, 1980, and led them to commit one of the worst massacres of civilians in modern Korean history.[11] (See table below for comparison.) Park was a military officer who was at the forefront of brutal civilian murders, and never apologized for the atrocities committed under his command. The National Fact-Finding Committee for the Punishment of the Perpetrators of the Gwangju Massacre (광주 학살 책임자 처벌을 위한 범국민 진상조사위원회) has described Park Jun-byeong as “a man who was directly responsible for the civilian massacre at Gwangju.”[12] This detail is not part of Eun Chang-soo’s character in the show.

    Eun Chang-su 은창수[13]

    Park Jun-byeong 박준병

    Fought in the Korean War as an underage ‘student soldier’ (학도병)

    Fought in the Korean War as an underage ‘student soldier’ (학도병)

    Attended the Korean Military Academy (육군사관학교)

    Attended the Korean Military Academy (육군사관학교)

    Additionally attended the fictional ‘Hanguk University’ and studied literature

    Additionally attended Seoul National University’s College of Liberal Arts and Sciences and earned a literature degree

    Character profile quote: ‘He likes poetry, is gentle and sensitive, and knowing his own personality, judged himself to be better suited to being a military academy professor than a field officer.’

    Taught as an instructor at the military academy after graduation, as well as a professor later in his career. In a Joseon Ilbo interview, he said he chose to attend Daejeon Middle School, rather than a teacher’s school, in order to become a college professor.[14]

    Character profile quote: ‘His superior officer refused to be part of Park Chung-hee’s coup d’etat of 1961 to the very end, and when he was arrested, Eun Chang-su also served time in prison with him.’

    According to the Joseon Ilbo interview, Park Jun-byeong’s superior officer, Commander Lee Han-lim of the First Army, refused to be part of Park Chung-hee’s coup d’etat on the basis of maintaining the military’s neutrality. After the coup, Commander Lee was brought to Seoul with Park Jun-byeong for their lack of participation, and Park spent a month in jail.[15]

    Character profile quote: ‘Perhaps it was because of this [history with his superior officer]? Despite being a member of the ‘Dongsimhoe’, the private clique within the Korean Military Academy, when Chun Doo-hwan’s Dec 12 coup occurred in 1979, Eun Chang-su did not go along with it at all. He could not accept that a military officer, who should maintain political neutrality, mobilize his division for such abnormal purposes.’

    In the Joseon Ilbo interview, Park recalled that he became a member of the ‘Hanahoe,’ Chun Doo-hwan’s private crony clique in 1970-1971. Park said that on the night of Chun’s Dec 12 coup, he received Chun’s request to deploy his troops, the 20th Division, to take over the Ministry of National Defense and the Army Headquarters. Park refused, remembering the dilemma of his former superior, Commander Lee Han-lim.[16]

  • Disney Plus clearly has ambitious and exciting plans for South Korean content on its platform, based on this interview you gave to the Hollywood Reporter,[17] and is making headway into numerous Asian markets as we write this. We hope that, with this immense access and reach, the company also takes note of the responsibility it has as a platform, and reflects on the kind of media content it makes available around the world.

    We, as academics of Korea, stand behind this letter and the points argued within.

    (Signees listed on following page.)

    Bae, Keung Yoon

    Assistant Professor of Korean Studies

    School of Modern Languages, Georgia Institute of Technology

    Brazinsky, Gregg

    Professor

    History and International Affairs, The George Washington University

    Bu, Chan Yong

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of East Asian Studies, Princeton University

    Creutzenberg, Jan

    Assistant Professor

    Department of German Language & Literature, Ewha Womans University

    Diederich, Inga Kim

    Assistant Professor of East Asian History

    Department of History, Colby College

    Han, Sujin Elisa

    Ph.D Candidate

    Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University

    Hillmer, James D.

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of Asian Languages & Cultures, University of California-Los Angeles

    Johnsen, Nikolai

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, SOAS, University of London

    Jung, Youngoh

    Ph.D Candidate

    Department of History, University of California, San Diego

    Kang, Sara

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of History, Harvard University

    Kim, Gene

    Ph.D. Student

    Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University

    Kim, Heejoo

    Ph.D. Student

    Department of East Asian Studies, Princeton University

    Kim, Iljung

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of Ethnomusicology, University of British Columbia

    Kim, Juwon

    Ph.D. Student

    Department of East Asian Studies

    University of Toronto

    Kim, Sung Eun

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of Asian Languages and Cultures, University of California, Los Angeles

    Kim, Yusung

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University

    Kwon, Donna Lee

    Associate Professor

    Ethnomusicology, University of Kentucky

    Lee, Anna Jungeun

    Korea Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow

    Nam Center for Korean Studies, University of Michigan

    Lee, Hyejoo

    Ph.D. Student

    Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, University of Southern California

    Lee, Minna

    Ph.D. Student

    Department of East Asian Studies, Princeton University

    Mueller, Ruth

    Associate Professor of Ethnomusicology

    Fine Arts Division, Green River College

    Oh, David C.

    Associate Professor

    Communication Arts, Ramapo College of New Jersey

    Park, Rachel

    Ph.D. Student

    Department of Comparative Literature, University of California, Berkeley

    Park, Sandra H.

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of History, University of Chicago

    Reizman, Laura H.

    Postdoctoral Fellow

    Program in East Asian Studies, Johns Hopkins University

    Saeji, CedarBough

    Assistant Professor of Korean Studies

    Pusan National University

    Shin, Cynthia

    PhD Student

    Department of Comparative Literature, Indiana University Bloomington

    Suk, Jihoon

    PhD Student,

    Department of Korean Modern History, Yonsei University

    Tran, Tommy

    Lecturer

    Department of History / CRES

    University of California, Merced

    Yang, Chamee

    Postdoctoral Research Associate

    School of Information, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

    Yang, Sungik

    PhD Candidate

    Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University

    Yi, Jongsik Christian

    Ph.D. Candidate

    Department of the History of Science, Harvard University

    [1] Korean historians and academics such as Jeon Woo-yong (research professor at Hanyang University’s Institute for East Asian Cultures), Shim Yong-hwan (director of the History Education Research Institute 역사N교육연구소), and Choi Jin-bong (professor of Journalism Studies at Sungkonghoe University) have already spoken on the topic.

    [2] For more information on Ms. Cheon, see: Sŏ Myŏng-suk, Yŏngch'o ŏnni, P’aju-si: Munhak Tongne. 2017.

    [3] ‘National Federation of Democratic Youth pandered to North Korean puppet regime’s united front’

    (‘「민청학련」 북괴의 통일 전선에 영합’), JoongAng Ilbo, April 24 1975. <https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/1374955>

    [4] Yoo Si-chun et al., ‘The Chronicles of the Democratization Movement: The Incident of the National Federation of Democratic Youth (‘[실록 민주화운동] 민청학련 사건’), Kyeonghyang Shinmun, June 1 2003. <https://www.khan.co.kr/article/200306011843081> Jeong’s name is listed as one of the “main ringleaders” in the article.

    Koo Hye-yeong, ‘The Truth of the People’s Revolutionary Party and the National Federation of Democratic: “an incident fabricated by the authoritarian regime’s torture,”’ Seoul Shinmun, Dec 8 2005.

    <https://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20051208004011>

    [5] ‘AROUND THE WORLD; South Korea Is Accused Of Torturing Dissidents,’ The New York Times, June 11 1986. <https://www.nytimes.com/1986/0…dents.html?smid=url-share>

    [6] ‘Seoul admits dissident died of brutality at police hands,’ The New York Times, Jan 19 1987. <https://www.nytimes.com/1987/0…l?searchResultPosition=39>

    [7] For a classic example of such a government scheme against an innocent civilian, see the case of ‘Suzy Kim’: Barbara Demick, ‘Cold War Cover-Up of Murder,’ Los Angeles Times, Feb 4 2002. <https://www.latimes.com/archiv…eb-04-mn-26268-story.html>

    [8] There is a dearth of English language material on this incident, which was called the East Berlin Incident (동백림 사건), but a 2006 fact-finding committee found that the victims had been accused unjustly. (See: Lee Bon-yeong, ‘NIS Development Committee for Clarifying the Past announces that “the East Berlin Incident was an overreach of espionage charges,”’ (‘국정원 과거사위 “동백림사건 간첩죄 무리한 적용” 발표’), Hankyoreh, Jan 26 2006. <https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/po…litics_general/98260.html>)

    [9] Character profile available here: <https://tv.jtbc.joins.com/cast/PR10011401/8>

    [10] Most famously, the ANSP was responsible for the cruel water torture and murder of college student Park Jong-cheol, which was the incident that sparked the 1987 June Struggle.

    [11] Bae Jin-yeong, ‘A Heart-to-Heart: Former National Assemblyman Park Jun-byeong, the true power behind the Fifth Republic’ (‘털어놓고 하는 이야기- ‘5共 실세’ 朴俊炳 전 국회의원’), Wolgan Joseon, Feb 1 2013. <http://monthly.chosun.com/clie…sp?nNewsNumb=201302100042>

    [12] Kim Sang-oong, ‘Who are the Gwangju Five?’ (‘“광주 학살 5적” 누구인가?’), OhMyNews, Dec 12 2019. <http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_We….aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002592244>

    The contents of the committee report is published in the news article. The original report can be found at the Demos Archives at Sungkonghoe University.

    [13] All details directly from the official character profile on the drama’s website: <https://tv.jtbc.joins.com/cast/PR10011401/8>

    [14] Bae

    [15] Ibid.

    [16] Ibid.

    [17] Patrick Brzeski, ‘“Our Ambitions Are Large”: Disney’s Top Asia Executive on Streaming Strategy and China Challenges,’ The Hollywood Reporter, Oct 21 2021. <https://www.hollywoodreporter.…reaming-china-1235033987/>

  • So they are asking Disney + to bring in Historians to overlook the Drama?


    Hasn’t it been done already ? I mean the case was brought to court and this court specialized on history and they rejected it. Also KCSC would have stepped in if the concerns turned out to be true and would have forced JTBC to make changes ( like they did with Mr.Queen)

    To feature an actual North Korean spy entering Korea by way of Germany and being pursued by South Korean agents in 1987, this drama reframes those tragic circumstances of history toward a justification of authoritarian wrongdoing.

    Episode 9 of Snowdrop…

    External Content twitter.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • Did I understand that correctly? they even put east Germany (where nk spy studied/had been active) and west germany(where som sk students went to as exchange students) into one pot to claim that the movie is try to build a connection between nk spies and sk students?

    What professors are they if they actual dissort German history to fabricate accusations again an fictional movie. Do sey sell professor titles at seven eleven or what?

  • Did I understand that correctly? they even put east Germany (where nk spy studied/had been active) and west germany(where som sk students went to as exchange students) into one pot to claim that the movie is try to build a connection between nk spies and sk students?

    What professors are they if they actual dissort German history to fabricate accusations again an fictional movie. Do sey sell professor titles at seven eleven or what?

    Yes didn’t you know? East and West Germany was one country in the 80s now…. And there were of course SK exchange students in East Germany because the East welcomed everyone in, especially foreigners who are anti-communism. These were their favorite type of people…..lol

  • Yes didn’t you know? East and West Germany was one country in the 80s now…. And there were of course SK exchange students in East Germany because the East welcomed everyone in, especially foreigners who are anti-communism. These were their favorite type of people…..lol

    guess germany needs to rewrite their history and school books then. i definetly learned it somehow differently. :p

  • Episode 9 of Snowdrop…

    External Content twitter.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    Really wish they wouldn't have Sooho, an actual NK spy, as the one saying that about the ANSP since from the ANSP's perspective, of course a north korean spy would think like that. Kang mu continues to be the most problematic character in the drama. But since JTBC is clear about doubling down, just hope both they and Disney have learned something about this experience. Curious to see if this drama will be exported further after airing.

  • Really wish they wouldn't have Sooho, an actual NK spy, as the one saying that about the ANSP since from the ANSP's perspective, of course a north korean spy would think like that. Kang mu continues to be the most problematic character in the drama. But since JTBC is clear about doubling down, just hope both they and Disney have learned something about this experience. Curious to see if this drama will be exported further after airing.

    No matter who would have said it, from the ANSP perspective, of course they would think that. Students have sad it, a democratic protester has said it, the Hall Director has sad it, the janitor has said and KM has mentioned it, the female lead has said it…with Sooho it’s like the 5th-6th character in the Show who brought it up. This time they needed Sooho to say it again so that he could have the confrontation with KM, which will lead to the conclusion that NK and the ANSP are the same and that they were just puppets they won’t hesitate to get rid of if they show a change in ideology.

  • lol they think they do something ?


    useless :pepe-joy:

    These are academics, not your random anti or stan. Do you think they will put this forward because of some kpop fanwar shit? They have legitimate historical concerns, in particular in how the representation will be understood by a largely foreign audience that is very unfamiliar with Korean history.

  • Honestly, a better method of resolving concerns over historical distortion is through educating the people watching it of the actual events. Either way there is still bias involved because no source is unbiased, but that would do more help than cancelling the drama. Imo, if there were disclaimers over controversial scenes added to describe how they might mimic history it would be a good compromise.

    Also, people need to stop touting the "it was proven in court hence it's alright" argument. Legal does not equal ethical, and this controversy is more ethical than it is an open and shut legal one.

  • These are academics, not your random anti or stan. Do you think they will put this forward because of some kpop fanwar shit? They have legitimate historical concerns, in particular in how the representation will be understood by a largely foreign audience that is very unfamiliar with Korean history.

    If they are actaully 'academic people', they should undetstand history between east-west germany at that time. LMFAO

  • Yes didn’t you know? East and West Germany was one country in the 80s now….

    I'm still awed some of the profs who signed have history degrees apparently and thought this, at least I think they're historians, though some of them are fields that have little to do with history, like the ethnomusicologist or the communication arts person. But still the majority are history profs and they still should know better.

  • Did I understand that correctly? they even put east Germany (where nk spy studied/had been active) and west germany(where som sk students went to as exchange students) into one pot to claim that the movie is try to build a connection between nk spies and sk students?

    What professors are they if they actual dissort German history to fabricate accusations again an fictional movie. Do sey sell professor titles at seven eleven or what?

    I could rant about academia all day, but in academics compliance has always been rewarded so for higher level degrees in the humanities for sure, it's all about how political your research can be and how it fits with whatever discourse is in, of course I'm not going to judge these specific academics one by one as I've read no papers by them yet, but they should have at least caught that error in editing, that's what you are supposed to do and fix it.

  • I could rant about academia all day, but in academics compliance has always been rewarded so for higher level degrees in the humanities for sure, it's all about how political your research can be and how it fits with whatever discourse is in, of course I'm not going to judge these specific academics one by one as I've read no papers by them yet, but they should have at least caught that error in editing, that's what you are supposed to do and fix it.

    I don’t think it was an error… North Korea and East Germany had good relations in the 80s (actually started in the 50s) and around 1.500 NK students studied in East Germany… SK students couldn’t enter East Germany and were only in West Germany. It’s something they should know and I think they left that out on purpose.


    Having a NK spy who lived and studied in East Germany and probably also studied espionage in East Germany as EG was infamous for their espionage tactics called Stasi, because NK and EG had political relations including the NK Embassy being in EG, is historically correct. To say that because a NK spy was a German student so this links him to SK students who lived in West Germany and therefore gives the ANSP the justification to frame SK students to be NK spies is misleading and all this to criticize the Drama knowing that many people won’t know this. I think it’s done on purpose.


Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!