Display MoreThe issue with the PAKs (and why I'm constantly shading them when I mention them) is not just that they change because of the music consumption.
Indeed the music market changed a lot and several metrics can't be compared directly with before, but this is not just the only problem with PAKs. The other metrics are all true, a song at #1 is a song at #1, a song in the top 10 or in the top 100 is the same, even if the music consumption changed, it's just that the success of the songs are now more reflected on longevity instead of a frontloaded good performance.
The thing is that PAKs are not that, the Ichart is a system that is in a constant change, each couple of years they add or remove different charts making it completely unnacurate to measure anything, if we go back to 2015 we had charts like Monkey3 that completely blocked several songs, back then we even had SM artists blocked in Cyworld! So they couldn't get PAKs. Now they added Youtube which is a completely different chart compared with the rest etc etc.
PAKs are the pure definition of bragging rights, they're confusing and there're metrics that can ressemble to it (Melon days at #1 mainly) more accurate that will give a way more fair result. Also the problem is how so many people use PAKs as the most relevant digital charting measure.
Well yes, but Melon days at #1 is also not a good metric to measure hits. There is a clear distinction that needs to be made between pre 2020 and post 2020 hits. Songs have much more longetivity because it is now harder to chart, as ULs count more than streams. Cheer Up was the girlgroup song that charted for the most time from 2016 to 2021 and now its probably not even in the top 10 anymore.