For people who don't understand why NJ is acting differently wrt contract termination compared to other groups :
First, it needs to be said that a group may choose to act one way or another not because of the contract but because of other circumstances, such as the fact that NJ is willing to fulfill their existing schedules while another group may specificaly want to get out of those upcoming activites.
Second, NJ's contract seems to have escape clauses written in instead of it being left to general contract law.
Another group trying to TERMINATE a contract may mean BREAKING the contract, and thus needing a court to declare that the group is not BREAKING the contract but instead getting out of an ALREADY BROKEN contract by showing that the company did not legitimately uphold the contract (in case of company failure/malfeasance).
Instead, by TERMINATING the contract through an ESCAPE CLAUSE they are NOT BREAKING it and in some ways actually UPHOLDING IT and it is on ador to show that it doesn't count, actually.
I think, though, that by using that escape clause they are kinda sorta waving their right to go after ador for damage? Because if dmg was done it was either solved (and they stayed) or they could have chosen to split (wich they ended up doing) thus stopping the damage from being done? I think this might be why those people who are theorycrafting NJ's ability to make ador pay are focusing on a counter-suit if ador tries to take them to court. So if fraudor stays put they should be covered, but I expect them to start shit and end up making themselves liable for defamation/harrassment or whatever.