I gave it a listen and I like it
Posts by selfmate
-
-
-
External Content www.instagram.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
(plus pictures)
External Content www.instagram.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.Enjoy
DiveTaglist
-
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Enjoy
FearnotTaglist
-
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Enjoy
OnceTaglist
-
-
-
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Enjoy
OnceTaglist
-
Source: Dahyun IG
OnceTaglist
-
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Enjoy
MyTaglist
-
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Enjoy
NeverlandTaglist
SoneTaglist
-
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Enjoy
ReveluvTaglist
-
nice
I was about to post this lol
-
-
those groups you mentioned aren't "struggling"
nugu groups struggle those groups are quite successful in their own right but they certainly ren't struggling...
it might be fair to say they aren't making waves but then again the question is what is "waves"?
also those top 5th generation groups certainly aren't losing money
-
1000 akrons is too much lower it a bit mate
50 akorns???? come on mate you have over 10K lol
let's up to at least 1000 to make it worthwhile
and make it a general bet as oppose to a specific winning number of games
1000 akorns to you if the pacers win
1000 akorns to me if the thunder win
my friend to go on your word as such...
-
Display More
Because among those rank^-x formula, -0.8 is the least step but still satisfies #1 > #2 + #3.
Originally I went for 1/rank (or rank^-1), but the difference between #2 and #10 is too big in this. -0.7 is definitely less drastic but doesn't give #1 the edge over #2 and #3.
I've thought about more complex methods but decided those weren't worth it lol.
The difference is more about a track can stay on chart longer than before. Weighted unique listeners can't fix this.
The <listeners of the group> / <total listeners altogeter> also doesn't work when comparing downloading era vs streaming era. One costs both money and time while other just costs time. A subscriber can just stream every songs they want, but they'll think twice before download anything.
it still explain why 1 > 2+3 why use that particular methodology? why not 1 > 2+3+4
also I haven't calculated anything but does it also mean 2>3+4 and so on? ie. does 98>99+100???
also no. 1 in melon historically had a higher number of UL than no.1 ion melon these days so why does both having a score of 1^-0.8
maybe use weighted UL / total UL per day and total those fractions as long as they stay in the top 100 or whatever...
why doesn't listeners/total listeners work since they only compare the available method of listening (ie. only streams previously) and not streams and downloads so we're comparing like with like. Prior to downloads every song was in the same boat - only streams were available and now every song is still in the same boat only streams and downloads are available...am I making sense?? lol
then is the solution to use something like goan points or circle points since they take into account the downloads as well (obviously that includes platforms beyond just melon.
-
$$$
it may be simply not profitable OR it is simply too much a risk for the investment proposed
-
again but why ^ (-0.8)
why that particular methodology
you say compared to the alternatives but again you never provide any justifications for why those alternatives in the first place...
you did mention that - The chart was being reformed many times, a #1 in 2015 is different than a #1 today. which is perfectly understandable so why not a weight metric based on total melon listeners of the group or song/ total listens altogether? or unique listeners of a song vs total unique listeners
that way it can account for the change in melon total listeners over time
-
so IVE are like opposite Rosé lol
