Display MoreHonestly, none of their albums previously were underperformed at all. I don’t see what you’re trying to get at here, but that’s clearly not the case. Their albums were well put together, and they were delivered just fine… TXT has done very well in each of their comebacks.
Coming from someone who is both an MOA and Stay, I think the real problem here is that most of the hype and traction that they got at first was because all the people that were fans of BTS were thrilled for their group’s junior to debut, and thus created a lot of hype over such. But as the people that were only there as company and success stans gradually faded away and moved on, things died down. That’s why it seems like they’re not doing so well, when really it’s just a calming down of their debut hype. Now they’re starting to gain fans who are actually fans because they liked TXT and not just because their predecessors were BTS. In my opinion they’re still in the process of gaining their true fans, they just had a big bang at first then they will start on the normal route of working to gain stans.
For stray kids, they started out as a normal group with no debut hype. They went through the normal group popularity increase trend, unlike TXT. They’ve been out for a couple of years now, and their music is clicking with the public well. It also helps that ODDINARY was extremely popular internationally rather than domestically. TXT is having more success domestically than stray kids, whose majority of fans are international.
Overall, I believe that they both have rather equal success and popularity, just in different areas, and they also different levels of hype.
Hype is not the same thing as popularity and success.
This one is from “Why is stray kids doing better than txt despite txt being from hybe?”
I liked this essay and don’t want to lose it hence why it’s being claimed now…
I would’ve answered this with a “RE” thread in the first place but I didn’t know how to do that at the time… so here I am now 
