Since this thread is still active, I’d like to address an important point.
Historically, not just in K-pop but across the music industry, the biggest BG’s have often outperformed the biggest GG’s in terms of metrics while being active simultaneously. Girl groups face more challenges and are more likely to disband within the first 2-3 years. The industry remains male-dominated, which inherently gives male groups an advantage.
BTS’s achievements are remarkable and unique, breaking records that even many Western artists haven’t achieved. However, their success is also partly due to being a boy group. This doesn’t diminish their hard work and talent, but it highlights an industry trend where boy groups generally have more opportunities to achieve significant milestones.
If anyone were to match BTS’s level of success, it would likely be another boy group rather than a girl group. This isn’t about ability or talent but about the industry’s structure and consumer behavior. Historically, the ratio of successful BG’s to GG’s shows that multiple BG’s can achieve great success simultaneously, whereas GG’s often struggle to reach the same level.
They can chart and especially in Kpop, might do much better chart wise…BUT when it comes to fan spending, BG’s typically receive more financial support. For instance, if you look at the top 10 best-selling artists of the last decade, only three are women. This disparity is telling.
So yeah BLACKPINK and BTS may not be equal in metrics due to these industry biases, but they are equally known in terms of global popularity.
This is why I find it so ridiculous when a bunch of people try to dismiss BP’s or any GG’s success by comparing it to metrics that are heavily influenced by consumer behavior. Like have some type of awareness. The biggest GG was never equally as successful in all metrics than the biggest BG… Never, so no point in comparing it lol