are the police a terrorist group 4 killing innocent ppl

  • To classify as an terrorist group they must be organized towards using terror to create political changes, that often tie with social, military and/or religious ones. As for example,


    Islamic terrorists attacked US army bases because they wanted the US Army to leave Saudi Arabia > political motive


    Italian government used false flag terrorism on the citizens so they could vote right wing parties > political motive


    Left wing Central American militias killed villagers so the people lose faith in their government and install a pro-Soviet socialist regime > political motive


    This is why random racists, incels, gangs, and even cartels don't classify as terrorists despite terrorizing people because their motives are hate or profit. That's the official definition as declared by the CIA and their associates, who were the first ones to create modern terror groups after the Cold War.

  • but what about police denying citizens the right to life and liberty? according to the FBI

    Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.


    im sure we all know by now that blk ppl are still systematical oppressed.


    https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism

  • there's some big difference. North Korea oppresses all of their citizens and kill them but nobody legally considers them a terrorist nation. although the US considers them "sponsors of terrorism". which means they pay terrorists


    so obviously the racist police and authority in the US is oppressive and bad, but not legally considered terrorism. however, some racist groups can potentially classify as terrorists if their motives become political rather than just hating people. for ex. the KKK if they terrorize black people so that they don't vote (political motive) they can easily classify as terrorists by the US government

  • there's some big difference. North Korea oppresses all of their citizens and kill them but nobody legally considers them a terrorist nation. although the US considers them "sponsors of terrorism". which means they pay terrorists


    so obviously the racist police and authority in the US is oppressive and bad, but not legally considered terrorism. however, some racist groups can potentially classify as terrorists if their motives become political rather than just hating people. for ex. the KKK if they terrorize black people so that they don't vote (political motive) they can easily classify as terrorists by the US government

    im not talking about legally im talking about the definition


    the police are relating to the government or the public affairs of a country which means political.


    and terrorism means

    according to the FBI

    Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.


    they have been killing innocent blk ppl for years

    systemic racism

  • Same Shit Different Day GIFs | Tenor Not even surprised by this logic

    LMFAO i though u were "done talking 2 me" but sense u cant get enough, how arnt they?


    the police are relating to the government or the public affairs of a country which means political.


    and terrorism means

    according to the FBI

    Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.


    systemic racism


    https://www.vox.com/2020/6/6/2…ts-racism-khalil-muhammad


    according to the FBI

    Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.


    if ur not ready 4 this conversation, just say that.

  • I wouldn't take the FBI's definitions for anything they're way worse than the police.

    I know right, lol

    Good for you, I didn't say OP or hey destinie before I said that so I wasn't talking to you. These are public forums

    Not all cops, barely even a small portion of them have ever been involved in any of these 'race crimes' or whatever it is you want to call them. The whole police force isn't the problem.

    I didn't say anything either way, saying yes or no to your question

    I said: Same shit, different day

    I think it's appropriate

  • its my form babe, clearly u dont want to talk to tootles :wink:

  • its my form babe, clearly u dont want to talk to tootles :wink:

    It's called a thread

    And you being the OP has nothing to do with it. You said what you said, I reacted. This is literally what threads are for...... reactions and discussions, but you wouldn't know that since I'm pretty sure you only lurk in the politics section. BTW, did you make this account just to troll people who believe differently than you or is it a coincidence that this is all you do on your account?


    It seems that anytime anyone comments on a thread of yours, or any thread really, and you don't agree with them you take it upon yourself to loudly express your opinion, not using actual English words or full english sentences, and try to put them in their place. It always seems like you aren't trying to learn, understand or respect others and how they feel, think and believe, but I guess the surface isn't everything.

    Anyways, have a nice day :)

  • I wonder when was the last time OP talked about k-pop on this k-pop forum. Probably never. And when I say k-pop, I'm refering to the actual music, not the CA controversies and other fishy topics for the drama hungry.

    Never, went all the way back and it's all just politics, some involving kpop and a thread on why non asians should be allowed to do kpop but yeah, never have they ever

  • It's called a thread

    And you being the OP has nothing to do with it. You said what you said, I reacted. This is literally what threads are for...... reactions and discussions, but you wouldn't know that since I'm pretty sure you only lurk in the politics section. BTW, did you make this account just to troll people who believe differently than you or is it a coincidence that this is all you do on your account?


    It seems that anytime anyone comments on a thread of yours, or any thread really, and you don't agree with them you take it upon yourself to loudly express your opinion, not using actual English words or full english sentences, and try to put them in their place. It always seems like you aren't trying to learn, understand or respect others and how they feel, think and believe, but I guess the surface isn't everything.

    Anyways, have a nice day :)

    i like the political section, i made this because i wanted to see other people opinion and debate with ppl thats what i am doing and thats what i have done, how do i ¨loudly voice my opinion¨


    im debating meaning-

    The aim of a debate is to convince the opposition that you are right. When the two sides agree on the subject or when one side's arguments are more convincing than the other side that is when the debate comes to a close. thats what i like so thats what i do their a difference between debating and trolling...


    ¨not using actual English words or full English sentences¨ its called slag, and when i misspell something its because my keyboard keys r sticky

    lol I know, I checked it too. It was merely a rhetorical question.

    how? it was a question, i wanted to see y and discuss-

    talk about (something) with another person or group of people.


    wither or not they should be and if they said something that i didn't agree with then i would debate

    The aim of a debate is to convince the opposition that you are right. When the two sides agree on the subject or when one side's arguments are more convincing than the other side that is when the debate comes to a close my opinion

  • That would depend on whether or not the specific department trains and orders its police officers with racial and political motives in mind. Each department operates differently, and there are thousands of police departments in the United States.


    Are there departments that operate with a political agenda and carry out violent, criminal acts in doing so? Definitely, but there are also departments that are much more neutral and unbiased in their approach.


    Side note: There are many of gangs in the United States, but they're not classified as terrorist groups because they don't have a political agenda. They exist for various reasons, but those reasons are not necessarily political. White supremacist gangs, however, are often motivated by political interest because racism, I believe, is political.

    I know and understand this. I know it isn't all police I am using people logic when ever they want to judge the whole BLM movement with ¨their terrorist¨ to try and justify them being racist.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!