Posts by hruaiic

    Now can you sue them for this ? I thought about it again, and even though they deserve it…, it would be tough. You'd need to prove they knowingly shared the wrong footage, which is hard since media outlets rely on their sources and they have to trust that they did the necessary fact check. It wouldn’t be the first time something like this happened. They often correct the mistakes, apologize and face no legal consequences, unless the story was entirely fabricated, which wasn’t the case here.

    As a big media outlets and professionals, they should be able to do proper research and found out everything before reporting on it. If they don't know the truth, why didn't they put effort to know it. Isn't there anyone who can even confirm and research even a little.

    Do you not know what the false report brings? He is called a liar and so many other things.If you say you don't know, then there is no point talking to you. And I would prefer if some big media didn't push false story anytime.

    And I don't care if he is punished, if he do something wrong he should be.

    But the way some people are using that misinformation to make him seem like some kind of a terrible and inhumane person don't sit right with me.

    So, You are okay with punishing someone for things that didn't happen but not for the reasons they should be?

    Wtf is this?

    Of course he is at fault and in the wrong. But you think that he should admit that all those false allegations just because he is drunk. He should admit to riding dangerous vehicles among a lot of people at a high speed just because jtbc says so(even though they are wrong)? You think that he should be punished much worse that he should have gotten because a news media decided to publish wrong informations.


    This is not about whether he should be punished or not, this is about trying to bring a downfall onto someone by making false statements to make someone look more guilty that they are.


    I truly believe he should be punished as he did something wrong but to say it's okay that media spread around false information, try to blame him for something much worse that he didn't do and make him receive much more hate than he should, is just downright low even if you don't like him.

    wow, the mhj stans here really worship her as a god who can do no wrong. Guess she manage to succeed in manipulating y'all to lose your humanity in order to defend her.


    I am not saying mhj is wrong/right and the employee B is wrong/right, but y'all seriously needs to chill. At least wait for a little before throwing insults at anyone.

    There are also a lot of other comments not supporting mhj.

    Ok, according to y'all, companies should just stop making announcement when their idols can't attend a shedule.

    You think mhj didn't do damaging media play too???

    "On this day, Hive's blurred KakaoTalk contents were reviewed privately to prevent third-party viewing due to personal information issues."


    doesn't this insinuate that the court actually DID look at the texts? not sure how this proves your point that the court threw out evidence. seems like they only agreed with the fact that mhj did not conset for the info to be extracted.

    That's what I thought happen but they keep saying that the court outright rejected it.

    Someone already explain about this, so I don't care about your opinion anymore. Good luck on your journey stanning mhj.

    Source from the qoo, k-gen etc. Where is your source of it being accepted as evidence??

    The only thing I heard is that it is submitted, but mhj side plead not to be read out loud, and the court acknowledge their claim that it 'could be' tampered with (not confirm that is edited or tampered) and also because of privacy. So I simply wonder why y'all say that it is rejected by the court and could not be used at all.

    I shared it yesterday. There were articles on it too that Knetz were sharing as references too.

    Although it's interesting that this fact is getting ignored in favor of leaks of text. Who else has the texts that was edited and chained to fabricate a narrative if not Hybe? Although I'm sure Hybe can come with some excuse and that's why they used that YT guy who can be the fall guy. He's known to wreck people's lives using false evidence and has been sued multiple times for that.


    Both Hybe and MHJ were given extra time to present additional material to the court. So this frenzied media play is really unnecessary. Well time for real life.

    I only heard that they presented as evidence but mhj side argued about it not to be released or read out, not about the court outright rejecting it.

    its just a play with words from MHJs lawyers.


    Apparently, the youtuber has the chats that were presented to the court. Imagine pages and pages of black and white chatlogs.


    So the chats the reporter presents are indeed edited to look like an actual kakaotalk, but that doesnt mean they edited in the sense of creating a whole conversation that didnt exist

    Probably yeah. It's pretty much clear that the conversation exist.

    Okay thanks. I can't use these screenshots as 100% true then. I will wait for mlre details although I do believe MHJ talks like this lol


    I am just not sure about validity of these screenshots.

    I mean, the chats could be edited or are taken out of context by hybe or whatever, but it's pretty much confirmed that they exists and are real. The only thing unsure is if they are edited to incriminate mhj or not, as both party won't confirm directly.