Please tell me can you define his actions as Sexual Harassment, because he touched only her legs and that’s it? Yes it is harassment because he touched her without her consent! But can you all define what is actually a sexual harassment is? Let’s forget about girls’ behaviour and believe that she is 100% innocent and police investigation is also false! And let’s not believe a single word from Onew, CCTV and People in the bar! And let’s not take into consideration his intoxication state! So in what category according to you he falls in?
Look, I didn't want to address your string of offensive word salads before but I'm tired of you a-dragging this on and on and b-lying about the details of the case to people who apparently weren't around when it happened and are unaware of the actual details. So here I'll share some actual facts and clarifications
-first of all I'm sorry to break it to you but Onew's intentions don't matter. What matters is the woman felt sexually molested by him. His intentions also don't matter particularly because we can not know them. His intoxicated state also doesn't matter because why exactly should the woman bear the consequences of his irresponsible drinking? That's not an excuse.
And now let me correct the wrong information you have been spreading :
1- the woman wasn't dancing on a table, she was dancing on a 30cm high platform meant specifically for dancing (not that it would have made her deserving of harassment if she had been dancing on a table like you have been implying)
2- Onew touched the woman 3 times
3- the cctv didn't prove anything in Onew's favor because that particular spot of the club was regrettably no covered by cctv
4- the woman agreed to SM's request to drop the charges but SHE STILL maintained that she was sexually harassed regardless, and her decision was influenced by the fact her identity was exposed which consequently subjected her to further harassment.
5- the only witness confirmed that Onew touched the woman. They said it LOOKED TO THEM like Onew only did it for support but even they can't possibly confirm that
6- no one contested or argued against the victim's claims that she was molested. Onew said he was too drunk to remember and SM said there was an agreement to drop charges but even they didn't argue that he was innocent.
7- the prosecution eventually dismissed the case because the victim was uncooperative (point 4) and because there was no cctv footage, not because Onew was proven innocent like you claim.
8- if you think Onew's "apology" has any relevance here then boy are you wrong. Onew apologised to his "loving" fans, his teammates, his parents and the company. He didn't event apologise to the victim or clearly acknowledge the incident. And most importantly the apology was coincidentally only done right after fans threatened to boycott the group's season greeting merch if SM didn't remove Onew from the group.
And finally, to answer your actual question : yes, I do categorise him as a sexual molestor
Don't bother quoting me again, I won't be reading anymore of your bs.