5 is unfair tho, 6 is unfair, for the 3 times first player, for the other 3 times second player
u have already got to next round so u have just lost to me on purpose lol since u wont lose anything anyway to avoid suspicion also, chess doesnt matter here lol, i dont even know how to play chess but i am decent at connect 4
and who knows if u beat me in the finals i just dont want to play if there is 0 possibility for me to win
then why is three fairer? isn't more games fairer since you seem to think that the game has been "solved"
and hell if my strategy is close to the optimal strategy then great for me...I've hit the jackpot...
of course chess matters both are games of strategy and everybody knows chess is so much more complicated than c4 lol
increasing one's strategic knowledge is what matters> no?
you're not just decent at c4 you're the best apparently...and I played my best so if you think i threw that game sure go ahead it does't really bother me...
so basically you're doing a trump and stating that if you lose to me or anybody in the finals it's because you had zero chance and that I'm a bot and that i someone cheated...interesting...