[instiz] WOULD YOU RATHER A BALANCED GROUP VS GROUP WITH DEFINITE POSITIONS?

bypannchoaAugust 10, 2022

1. Balanced group members : All the members are above average at vocal, dance and rap, but there's nobody that have stand out talents

VS

2. Definite position group members : they have the final boss of singing, but they're stiff at dancing, they have a final boss at dancing, but they're tone deaf, etc..

What is your preference?

original post: here

1. 1 for me... I hate having holes in the group

2. 2, I rather they're crazily good in one area

3. 2, whether you lack in singing or dancing, with experience, you'll be able to fill that hole

4. 2, I rather definite talent... If the main vocal doesn't have a crazily good voice, I can't even be drawn to them

5. 2, If you don't have a clear position, your group looks ambiguous

6. 1, I can't stand having a hole in the group, if they keep looking unpleasant to the eye, they'll never hit big

7. It's so obviously #1

8. 2... Honestly, it'd be hard for me to find the charming point in #1, I join fandoms based on skills

9. 1, If only one person is stiff on stage, the stage and song quality drops considerably, and if they try to cut down the parts of the stiff members, the fans will throw a fit about why that member is getting less parts

10. 2222, if everyone is an all-rounder, there's no fun to it

Definitely 1.

It's more satisfying to watch and listen to if everyone is on the same lvl.

Unfortunately, I think fully balanced groups are very rare and I cannot think of one off the top of my head.

There's always those couple of members who aren't great dancers or can't really sing. It's a dream though lol.

Quote from red11

I think a group is definitely going to be more successful if all their members are 6/10s in most things but a 11/10 in one thing. Way easier to stand out that way.

Can you give a group as an example?