is it me or do I see a little bit of Jihyo in her too???
That's what I was thinking.
is it me or do I see a little bit of Jihyo in her too???
That's what I was thinking.
apparently this where is originated from
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Thank you. I hate the term more now.
I don't see the problem. Kpop always put their own flavor onto Western sounds.
My problem is LSRFM is slowly losing the identity they built up. They had their own sound.
Then they started hard chasing industry trend. Easy Listening -> amapiano -> If I had to guess, Sabrina Carpenter inspired funky pop or maybe country pop.
The way I saw this sentence so many times on tt, but I still have no idea what it means in this case
Hello fellow geriatric. We can go reminisce about Big Bang and Wonder Girls.
Am I getting old? When did nachos become a thing?
Stop repurposing words.
I'm just glad we are leaving the Crazy era.
Let's be real.
The point is many people are wishing NJZ members get their comeuppance. It is a sentiment that I've seen on here, reddit and other social media platforms. Basically, NJZ members and MHJ should be buried in debt, penalties and legal fees. They deserve to be in unsurmountable debt for what they did to x, y and z. They can leave, but they have to 'pay'.
What do people/fans think the end result of such oppressive penalties will be? The brains of these fans are so warped by stan culture that they are wishing and hoping a conglomerate crushes a group of girls/artists.
When life gives us lemons, make lemonade
Bandjeans (BJZ?) was superior anyway
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
That Lollapalooza performance had me in a chokehold for a while. The band, the girls and most of all the crowd was insane.
this isn't specific for NJZ specifically but I understand how certain rights holders may be able to prevent someone or some group from using or singing their songs in public
such as like IF I was anti-trump and trump tried to use my song at a rally or event I would be able to prevent that???
does that same theory hold with for example let's say ADOR specifically saying we are not allowing NJZ to perform the copyright songs?
From what I'm reading, there are different rules and procedures when politics are involved.
The problem comes if NJZ uses loud backing tracks, pre-recorded tracks, videos, names and images that are under Ador's copyright. However, the only barrier to a live performance is KOMCA's approval, not Ador.
I'm sorry, what now? Venues? Be serious, please! Do you think the owner of a venue doing the licenses? Yeah, that's not how it works.
Right, almost the same name. I'm just guessing and if they can have a World Tour we'll see what song they can or will sing anyway. I don't really mind anything, kinda bored with this Kdrama, but nice to see HYBE and ADOR suffer.
You don't have to be so condescending. You can look this up.
Performance Rights: For live K-pop performances, venues typically need to secure licenses that allow for the public performance of copyrighted songs. These licenses ensure that songwriters, composers, and publishers receive royalties for the use of their work.
Venue Responsibility: Often, concert venues have blanket licenses that cover live performances of copyrighted material. These licenses typically allow for the public performance of copyrighted songs within the venue.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/if-concert-venues-have-blanket-AyVw9d4lSBmrPiP2iAf4Xw
No, the owner of a song cannot block singers from performing their songs live if the venue has the appropriate blanket licenses. Venues typically acquire blanket licenses from Performing Rights Organizations (PROs) like ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC, which allow for the public performance of copyrighted songs, including covers. These licenses give performers the right to play any song in the PRO's repertoire without needing individual permission from the copyright owner.
Once a song has been published, the right to perform it live becomes subject to compulsory licensing under copyright law. This means that as long as the venue has the proper licenses, performers can legally cover songs without seeking explicit permission from the original artist or copyright holder.
It's important to note that:
In summary, if a venue has the proper blanket licenses, copyright owners cannot prevent their songs from being performed live at that venue.
Sure, if their case would be normal, but it isn't. It's not like they left ADOR like best friends.
Even if the songs were produced outside HYBE/ADOR, they don't own the copyright, so they have to pay for it. Not sure if KOMCA would let them do this, btw. I'm pretty sure I read something about them saying NJ should go back to ADOR.
Also, ADOR and HYBE owns the name NewJeans, so technically they have a say in any NJ covers.
Venues obtain licenses. It allows singers to sing copyrighted songs without seeking individual permissions. It isn't that big of a deal.
A lot of the creatives behind V's Layover album has direct ties to MHJ/BANA/NJZ. I'm going to guess the new direction will be closer to pop/r&b rather than straight hip hop.
I'm excited. New music with the same group of creatives. It has to be the one that MHJ shared at her lecture, right?
When the time comes, I'll take out his knee. You take that torch to his head.
Me coming into the thread after the arguments and ban have passed.
Ella has surprised me in a good way.