Posts by 40-deuce
-
-
Even if this is giving their idols unnecessary hate?
Fans need to get used to idols' dating lives being none of their business.
Their labels are likely monitoring their comments and considering legal options against indiviuals sending threatening messages.
-
That was last year. Since then, they had so many front-loaded singles that were hot for a week and disappeared a week later that BB Hot 100 has been starting to lose credibility and "prestige" if that's what you want to call it.
The charts no longer reflect the most popular or well liked song of the week, but which fandom has the most time and resources to game the system.
-
Pretty sure with big company like JYP they Will have lawyer from both side present at the contract signing.
And if it's illegal the why would alot of GG member talking about it .
And it's a company we're talking about, and they've in the industry for years,
And let's not forget about loopholes where they wont stated it openly on the contract , maybe smth Along the line "Will not do something that Will cause damage the group image/value"
Yes they could argue there's nothing about Dating in court, but the company can also argue that what she/he did is in fact did damage the group image/value"
And lastly it Seems like people getting me wrong . What i write is not my personal opinion but just pointing something out.
In my personal opinion , i don't really care , people date all the time
Exactly.
A "dating ban" in a contract could be something that technically doesn't ban them from dating, but "strongly encourages" them to refrain from it.
That's why I asked if that would even be legal to put in writing.
It seems highly unethitcal and a borderline human rights violation.
-
Contract is a contract .
If it's in the contract than it's real and if u sign it then it is what it is.
U Have to do what stated in the contract,
Unless the contract violates the law. What does the law in Korea say about employers dictating their employees' dating life?
-
Rules:
Grammys: They can nominate whoever they want. Charts, critics & fan opinions don't matter.
BBMAs: There's a formula to it. It constantly evolves, but it's applied to everyone the same.
-
BBMAS are based on charts, Grammys aren't.
They will at least get several nominations and probably a couple of wins.
-
Bieber and it's not close.
There's a reason all the kpop boys idolize him.
BTS has a large dedicated fanbase, but Bieber's name / mainstream recognition is on another level.
-
NFL> Soccer
Only in America. Football (soccer) reigns supreme in the rest of the world and it isn't even close.
The NFL hasn't even caught up to the NBA and their stars in terms of global appeal.
-
I have. I have seen every single one because I watch football and know who watches football.
You're talking about the same crowd who got mad at players peacefully protesting during their beloved game and agreed with Trump when he called them sons of bitches.
If you think they would be welcoming to seeing 7 guys they've never seen before, perform songs they've never heard before and can't understand during their sacred AMERICAN [their emphasis, not mine] Football halftime show, you are wrong.
I'm not giving the dude bros and credit, I'm just being realistic.
BTS would deliver a fantastic show, but it's the wrong place, wrong audience.
-
Also in this case I think it might be more a case of xenophobia ( = they are not americans ) than racism. All the black artists who performed were americans citizens.
It would be who-the-hell-are-those-people-??? first, what-the-hell-are-they-saying-??? second, racism third, xenophobia fourth.
They didn't mind Shakira (Colombian) and would't mind U2 (Irish) or Adele (British) because those artists are huge in America and not just with a very particular niche audience.
-
Black artists prform at the superbowl all the time lol
People tend to look passed that shit when you have 100 million people watching you
That's an overstatement. They get cameos or featured artist spots, but in the last 20 years only Beyoncé, Prince, The Weeknd and 1/4 of The Black Eyed Peas were black artists headlining the event.
That's what we're talking about right? BTS headlining, not making an appearance during another artist's set.
Btw, their Coca Cola deal will not help them get the Pepsi Halftime Show gig.
-
The majority of people watching the Super Bowl (white men) do not know who BTS are. If you make them sit through 15 minutes of songs they don't know and can't understand, they will riot. The backlash from the dude bros and conservative networks like Fox News would be tremendous. Why would you wish that on them?
-
yes it turns around in the funniest ways Louis vuitton owns Celine, Bulgari, Tiffany & co. and Dior
That's LVMH.
LVMH owns Louis Vuitton, Celine, Bulgari, Tiffany & co. and Dior.
-
Lukas, too.
-
-
-
-
-
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.