[theqoo] JUNGKOOK 'GOLDEN' IZM RATING


  • [theqoo] JUNGKOOK 'GOLDEN' IZM RATING


    AVvXsEjOHq5J0bCCUlpJcKYXSJZOg8a82oKvlM56Dy_bPlRbG1m4wBhhlUEkEmDSwMBAjVuUm7LqW0JnIwtwRrKTVMn6uXWYjynOjH73tNUr4XaXcu2TIhE8dT4_nHDJ7e5SfF1obguIwYnZSYWqiCQ7S4XSIRehNaFWwRwsUe-ICw7bxHVQp0uj3EOiINheUk0=s16000

    By Han Sun Hyung


    When discussing music, the phrase "pop-esque" is usually considered a compliment. The "poppiness" of K-pop and the maximalist elements of idol music are looked down upon, and the "cleanliness" of Anglo-American music is seen as something to be admired. Jungkook's 'Golden' shatters these prejudices and creates a new wave of discourse. It's a reminder of how "pop star" is an empty title in today's borderless, genre-bending K-pop market.


    In a myopic assessment of singles, the lack of individuality could be interpreted as a positive. It's a different story when it comes to albums. He becomes Justin Timberlake in "3D," The Weeknd resembles Michael Jackson in the title track "Standing Next To You," and dons the mask of Justin Bieber in "Closer To You". That doesn't mean that Jungkook is their intersection. Compositions that are busy racing to the top of the US radio charts erase the subject and leave it blank. It feels like listening to an algorithmically generated playlist.


    'Golden' is a stark reminder of HYBE Entertainment's desire to take the "K" out of K-pop. Just like how Le Sserafim has a touch of Rosalia and NewJeans has a touch of PinkPantheress. The only clue to the singer's presence in a parade of tracks that are overwhelmingly marked by traces of the composer's style or references is his unobtrusive command of English lyrics. Perhaps his competition isn't fellow musicians, but rather the latest trend in AI voice programs.


    It's a good thing he doesn't try to make a personal statement or preach a philosophy. 'Golden' is a spokesperson for the ultra-luxury A&R system that pays huge amounts of money for songs in a thoroughly organized and industrialized process. The album's collection of "easy-listening," "trendy," and "short" songs, sourced from famous songwriters such as Ed Sheeran, Shawn Mendes, and DJ Snake, vividly displays the global public's view of current K-pop music. If you need an example of stateless music that has everything ranging from popular genre, short form and top key words, look no further.


    Silence, not roar, is the only place where there is a conflict between the benefits of K-pop and the desire to rise as a Western pop star. As usual, there is a quota to be met, and all the remixes and half-price discounts that come with launch events make a solo career, which could have been a time of pathfinding, seem like bait to get to the top of the charts. It's degrading to use music as a means and not as an end. Maybe it's just a cool recognition, like Chairman Bang Si-hyuk's recent comment that BTS has adopted a "famous for being famous" strategy. The album symbolizes the golden age of the 2020s, where selling a lot is good enough.



    -Side Tracks-
    1. 3D (Feat. Jack Harlow)
    2. Closer to you (Feat. Major Lazor)
    3. Seven (Feat. Latto) (Explicit ver.) ✅
    4. Standing next to you
    5. Yes or no ✅
    6. Please don't change (Feat. DJ Snake)
    7. Hate you
    8. Somebody
    9. Too sad to dance
    10. Shot glass of tears
    11. Seven (Feat. Latto) (Clean ver.)


    original post: here


    1. So I guess the album wasn't good


    2. I had the same thoughts. It was rated low overseas too


    3. I'm enjoying the songs but I also agree with the review


    4. Compared to this, The Guardian gave the album a bad review
    AVvXsEik8Clhny8UyMkfRZRMcKSgVogAG7ndM7A3yN5cWbtMEIot-SNV2IdULoLYkIYZbmo1_1U64MFrs-10JG5CppC6KIvdDY6hLxYVeqzVIp19xE34E2sDw2BT7peMgsK1ej3WSSzSB2-3DA0PZzeARzh2sFP_DGCbZng5QrzQqSYJB2Sk0qyHTRSiOlsKkXU=w595-h640

    5. Honestly, I kinda agree


    6. Personally, I agree a lot. This review really captures the bittersweet feelings I have for this album. The 3rd paragraph just hits the nail


    7. Wow this is a terrible review;;


    8. IZM never reviews the music but everything that's on the exterior


    9. I like all the songs but I also feel like I've heard all the songs somewhere else before


    10. He's just trying to hate on HYBE at this point


    11. I don't think it has to do with Jungkook. All of HYBE's recent releases have gotten bad reviews


    12. This review was better written than I expected


    13. But I do think that what he said was true


    14. It's true. This album was to make him into a "pop star" after all


    15. To be honest, I did think about the other artists that he mentioned in the review



    [theqoo] JUNGKOOK 'GOLDEN' IZM RATING
    We translate Pann articles about Korean news, music, drama and lifestyle
    www.pannchoa.com

  • Mind you, that is the same critics that gave Cupid 4,5/5 - so suddenly the English, the virality, the song being made for tik tok by foreign producers was not an issue.


    Seeing that like 90% of their "review" is not about the album or songs on it but rather on Bang PD and Hybe, it's clear that they have agenda.

  • Mind you, that is the same critics that gave Cupid 4,5/5 - so suddenly the English, the virality, the song being made for tik tok by foreign producers was not an issue.


    Seeing that like 90% of their "review" is not about the album or songs on it but rather on Bang PD and Hybe, it's clear that they have agenda.

    Oh thanks for the clarification. I was actually wondering if this critic goes around giving kpop songs low scores since majority of kpop tracks aren’t self produced or self written.



    It’s glaring to see he only keeps artistry in mind when he’s dealing with certain artistes. This already makes his reviews very biased, inconsistent and unjustified.

  • Oh thanks for the clarification. I was actually wondering if this critic goes around giving kpop songs low scores since majority of kpop tracks aren’t self produced or self written.

    it's not like izm gave bts a lot of good reviews jitb-d2-indigo got 2.5-3.5 stars

    wings-ly/mots series/be got 2.5-3.5 stars

    op favs didn't receive high scores towyuJFUz.png

  • Mind you, that is the same critics that gave Cupid 4,5/5 - so suddenly the English, the virality, the song being made for tik tok by foreign producers was not an issue.


    Seeing that like 90% of their "review" is not about the album or songs on it but rather on Bang PD and Hybe, it's clear that they have agenda.

    Yikes. I checked the review and it had 3 paragraphs about HYBE and Bang PD...

  • Mind you, that is the same critics that gave Cupid 4,5/5 - so suddenly the English, the virality, the song being made for tik tok by foreign producers was not an issue.


    Seeing that like 90% of their "review" is not about the album or songs on it but rather on Bang PD and Hybe, it's clear that they have agenda.

    Actually, this particular reviewer ATE up Seven and 3D like I was shook because he gave groups like Red Velvet, which are known for their great discography two-star ratings before. But all throughout the review, he doesn't even mention ONE song being bad but he has more gripes with Bang PD after that dumb-ass interview he gave about dropping the Korean out of k-pop. He references Bang PD and HYBE's direction for global expansion more than the actual album.


    Anyways, watch any non-kpop fan/reaction to Jungkook's album who obviously doesn't have a BTS anti-boner up their ass find Golden an absolute bop. But poppy pop albums are never fairly reviewed because mass appeal apparently is always bad to "critics" but indie/alternative/rock music that doesn't do numbers like pop is always rated more favorably. Case in point my new fav album that just dropped has bops upon bops


    F-jVpzQX0AAIsbX?format=jpg&name=large


    Nothing wrong with her album but being pop and having palatable music for mass appeal is her only flaw.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!