What is your opinions about Dispatch article that disprove various claims made on Fifty Fifty episode on Unanswered Questions?

    'Dispatch' disproves various claims made on the FIFTY FIFTY episode of SBS's 'Unanswered Questions'
    As controversy over the "biased" position of the SBS documentary program 'Unanswered Questions' continues, media outlet 'Dispatch'…
    www.allkpop.com


    Things have become much more complicated now. The producer of UQ is saying that they will redo the episodes and conduct an in-depth investigation, covering parts that were not shown before. Obviously they will focus on the Ceo's side too, potentially putting the girls in a more difficult position. The recent Dispatch article with evidence adds to the concern. It would be helpful if the girls could provide similar evidence to support their claims, especially regarding the hospitalizations of some members like they claims due to various reasons like panic attacks. At this stage, mere words will not be sufficient to regain public support. If the information in the Dispatch article is accurate, the CEO could counter with a defamation lawsuit, given that he possesses evidence. The girls side need something substantial to convince everyone. What's unsettling is that this situation could take years to resolve and could lead to more legal complications for them.


    I found a user saying this-"In addition, this incident occurred between June — July 2021. At the time, the members were still trainees. FIFTY FIFTY members agreed to an exclusive contract on March 5, 2022. If this incident had caused physical and mental shock, they shouldn’t have signed the contract."


    The parents should take the blame too because how in earth they allowed their kids signing the contract if this happen to them?

    Both companies were scamming them.


    If Cupid didn't take off, they would still be working without pay for another 7 years. But Cupid took off globally, and so they started to legitimately have questions about when they would be paid. And when the company refused to let them see the accounts, they knew they were being scammed.

    The girls are the victims. I think they are getting terrible legal advice from their parents or whoever is telling them to not settle though. Like why do this whole public case when nobody is on your side at all and really all the information c ok’ing out isn’t putting your arguement in the best light. Like the Givers were just as bad as their agency if not worse. So why trust the Givers? It’s just all dumb. A perfectly good group destroyed when they had so much potential.

    Quote from Teudungi21

    The girls are the victims. I think they are getting terrible legal advice from their parents or whoever is telling them to not settle though. Like why do this whole public case when nobody is on your side at all and really all the information c ok’ing out isn’t putting your arguement in the best light. Like the Givers were just as bad as their agency if not worse. So why trust the Givers? It’s just all dumb. A perfectly good group destroyed when they had so much potential.

    They are not victims they are greedy little bitches

    Quote from killthisfenty

    I know dispatch got paid

    The only thing here is Dispatch giving evidence for everything which is something that 50/50 side lacking a lot since the beginning of this case. They need to start exposing a concrete evidence too and enough with just talking.

    interesting


    we probably will never find out the "truth truth" since both sides have their own version of events and the truth probably lies somewhere in between

    This came out on reddit, it is about whether he misappropriated funds to pay starcrew, it is not known if it is true or not, but that is where the complaint before the judge is from, that is where the program should go to verify if it is true or not but it is distracted by other things


    a user puts this

    Now what's interesting is from this translation, they used the term "came to learn" which indicated that it's not just a wild accusation but they have done research/background check on it. Meaning that if they can prove this to be true then 1. Its proof that jhj has been embezzling money/stealing from the girls 2. they've lied to social media/"news" sites. And the whole "the givers made accounting errors" wouldn't really matter

    From the we_FiftyFifty community on Reddit: Part of the SBS Fifty Fifty episode (featuring their lawyer) translated:
    Explore this post and more from the we_FiftyFifty community
    www.reddit.com

    Quote from jhonx1

    This came out on reddit, it is about whether he misappropriated funds to pay starcrew, it is not known if it is true or not, but that is where the complaint before the judge is from, that is where the program should go to verify if it is true or not but it is distracted by other things


    a user puts this

    Now what's interesting is from this translation, they used the term "came to learn" which indicated that it's not just a wild accusation but they have done research/background check on it. Meaning that if they can prove this to be true then 1. Its proof that jhj has been embezzling money/stealing from the girls 2. they've lied to social media/"news" sites. And the whole "the givers made accounting errors" wouldn't really matter

    https://www.reddit.com/r/we_Fi…_fifty_episode_featuring/

    I know lawyers can be sleazy but I don't think the law firm representing Fifty Fifty will accept and push through with this in the legal court if they have zero basis, Barun(their law firm) is not some random law firm down the street who are hungry for cases even if it's unwinnable.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login