Nope. There is a reason why psy and boa will always remain bigger personalities than iu even though iu does better than them in korean digitals. There's a reason why iu is not even the biggest female soloist coming out of korea. The reason is she has done nothing other than digitals in korea. That's how relevant her records are. In future she will be as relevant as shin seunghun who is the best selling korean soloist of all time but still does not get mentioned alongside the names seo taiji, cho yongpil, psy or boa. Because their impact is nowhere to be found.
Also bts "failures" during 2013-2016 is what made the greatest korean artists of all time. Getting famous with one viral moment doesn't make you that which is why someone isn't even top 5 korean soloist of all time.
It is very much evident who is cooking up excuses here by acting like being popular in only one market is more important than being popular across the world.
What rot, during BoAs peak, digitals weren't even a thing?
Another dodge is to conflate multiple markets - as though success in one is an excuse for failure in another.
I completely accept that IU is irrelevant outside S.Korea and China to an extent. I have not problems stating that.
But on the other hand, in S. Korea, to deny her as the foremost soloist for the last decade..heck forget soloist, she beats up all groups including BTS in many ways.. that is just delusional.
But fans are by definition delusional when it comes to their idols.