my thought is that if any of her investors were really already 100% on board, she would have already just resigned or even responded privately to hybe's initial internal correspondance calling for a board meeting. she's clearly biding her time. either trying to still convince newjeans or still convince investors. and now with hybe's character assassination of her, it wont be as easy.
Investors on board doesn’t really mean anything if there is nothing in the corporate governance structure that allows her to buy shares. So why would she resign if she had investors?
Selling shares would also need approvals from the board of both the subsidiary and the parent. Hybe’s entire ecosystem would be bottom of the barrel if it didn’t have those basic checks and balances in place so you have to assume they do.
99% of the ADOR strategies being floated about don’t make any sense which is where my confusion comes in. Why would an investor deal with Ador at the moment if they’re interested in New Jeans, when Hybe are the majority owner with also the voting rights I.e they make the final decision on who to sell to. You can’t own Ador without going through Hybe.
If potential investors were to then start spouting weaknesses/threats to Hybe in any meetings that they could only know through insider trading, Hybe would surely tell them to piss off and it’d be a massive red flag.
If there was some ridiculous clause that allowed them to sever their relationship with Hybe for a penalty fee, especially after complaining about plagiarism, Hybe would still be pissed and with the power they wield in the entertainment sphere, would blacklist them to hell. That’s not a good end result for MHJ or NJ.
The only strategy that makes sense is Hybe being forced to sell Ador for debt reasons, without them knowing it was pushed by MHJ. Because if they knew, it’d be back to getting black listed. But that’s incredibly unlikely
Confused