Listen, I'm here to help. Yes, I am not a crazed BTS fan; but I do like their music. But these moves by BTS's parent company are a cause for concern for both consumers and sellers alike with regards to this industry. Trust me, I have no animosity towards BTS, but what is right is right. And they have to stand up to this, if only to treat their fans better than this.
Heh I love ppl who 'help' by treating everyone else like an idiot child. That doesn't work very well, FYI.
You keep referring to the original post when ppl point out the obvious, but the issue remains that your argument has a glaring hole that you have not addressed and can't avoid:
What is this mythical 'this' to which you refer? You're talking about this issue as one of absolute moral imperative but you actually haven't laid out an argument for why this is a morally important issue or how just via album prices consumers are being taken advantage.
You don't have to buy BTS albums, or any merch, to enjoy BTS. No one listens to the CDs, we just buy bc they're pretty and it's fun. There is no obligation. BTS and BH gives us tons of free content. The fan culture does not think you have to buy BTS stuff to be ARMY. Expensive albums with fancy packaging have been a kpop thing for forever.
BigHit isn't even close to the biggest player either as a content provider or an agency in Kpop. CJ ENM (and Kakao) Take those awards by far. So you can't argue BH is some serious threat to the independence of the industry when CJ has eaten up smaller companies like candy and will probably keep going. SM has far, far more talent on its books.
So you need to lay out 1: Why album prices, which are no higher than others in kpop, are a moral concern of any sort and how you can use 'what's right is right' in this case
2: Why what BH is doing is in some way 'concerning', and more so than what CJ ENM has done.
If you don't, you just seem to be making random, emotional claims without any facts to back it up.