"Stray kids" sound so much like commonly use term "Stray dogs" which is used to refer to homeless dogs that live on random streets.
Based on that logic "Stray Kids" should refer to homeless kids that live on streets
But Stray kids members are not homeless and don't live on streets,
which means them claiming that they are "stray kids" is a blatant lie, and it can even be considered as identity theft and cultural appropriation of actual homeless people.
I read some time ago that somebody sued red bull drink company because they wrote "it gives you wings" on their drink cans but since that man didn't got any wings after drinking it he was cheated by the company and court made red bull company pay him millions in compensation.
So if i buy a stray kids album and then sue them for not actually really being "Stray kids" court could either make the stray kids members live on the streets or i could get millions in compensation, both nice situation imo
