more BABYMONSTER!
Hasn't it been like 9 "last time"s already
Like cmon, when is it actually going to be the last time.
average egg user behavior
Nah nah, this is driving me crazy now. Normally I'd let it go but you've responded very angrily and rudely since the beginning and you are WRONGGGGGG.
def. yes. I think many groups have experienced their own golden era like SNSD did groups like GFRIEND, TWICE, BLACKPINK, NewJeans, aespa, Red Velvet, MAMAMOO… Most of them dominated Korea with their music at one point, were all over variety shows, became faces of major brands, and were the most talked-about names of their time.
Go ahead, tell me where in this response you see anything about longevity? Please, I'll wait. I see multiple groups listed (your own faves included) that clearly do not have longevity, so I think they understood what peak meant. At most you could disagree with the choices.
Then followed it up with:
That was the only time longevity was referenced, and it wasn't done in a way that invalidates the prior text.
Ergo, you are wrong. Ergo, you get quoted and corrected. Bye. 
Display MoreWhy type all these words when your current signature would have sufficed?
How "weird" that you're exhibiting that laughable behavior on behalf of another user, while being under the belief that it's laudable instead.
People clearly tend to consider and say a lot of idiotic things. I personally tend to correct misinformation or poor logic when I see it. My only bias is bias towards the fundamental principles of very basic concepts such as peak and longevity.
ISaidISaid is clearly not taking my offer, so I rescind and extend it to you
Go to the RealGm Forums. Make an account. Go to the Basketball sub forum and then the general discussion sub forum. Make a thread wherein your claim player peak and player longevity are essentially the same. Link the results here.
Let's see how the thread goes and I'll give you 1,000 akorns. We'll see how much of what I say is bias and how much is common sense.
The funny thing is you don't even seem to comprehend that I quoted you for the same exact reason that you initially quoted that user. I didn't do it out of some noble effort, I did it because you were WRONG and you've more or less admitted that by ignoring my request to quote the initial post and show me where they conflated the 2 topics.
Like you, when I see someone who is acting a fool, I try to point it out and correct them. Maybe you meant to quote isaidisaid and misclicked?
Display MoreNo, I don't look silly. People who disagree with my statements just look dumb. And it's equally dumb to take issue with my elucidation of the fact longevity and peak are not the same thing and have never been the same thing.
This isn't my opinion and it's not a subjective stance. This is a logical FACT.
And anyone who has any familiarity with sports, as you do, should be ashamed of taking a position that could even be potentially assumed as a defense of the intellectually bankrupt belief that longevity and peak are the same.
Those aren't synonyms, friend. They are two different words with two entirely different meanings.
If the conversation is ever about peak, it's a logical fallacy to start bringing in a bunch of longevity metrics, and to claim otherwise is pure sophistry.
You made a mistake in quoting me, just like that user made a poor interpretation and conflated two entirely different concepts.
Live with it, champ.
It's so funny that someone who can write so well always proves to lack basic reading comprehension. I quoted you initially because you unleashed your clearly biased rant upon someone undeserving. The user literally never conflated the two, if you think it's clear that they did then you should be able to easily quote their comment and show me. Go ahead. You could've quoted plenty of other users but you chose wrong.
I said people clearly tend to consider longevity when discussing peak, which is true. Believe it or not it's possible for me to acknowledge that while also understanding that peak and longevity are two different things.
It's not weird; it's corrective. Anyone who has a problem with what I said doesn't know what the fuck they're talking about, and I'll say it again louder in case people can't grasp the simple premise of peak versus longevity.
What's weird is your acting aggrieved on behalf of someone who neither needed nor asked for your protection.
This is the last time I give this forum grace for trying to demonize me for having common sense. It's been a peaceful, if not boring week here. Don't ruin it while I'm being nice.
Lol I just quoted you cus you looked silly. It's clear you're pressed by the other comments in here that did actually lump longevity and peak together, but you responded to someone who didn't.
Like I understand what you are saying and even agree to an extent but clearly people do tend to consider longevity when discussing peaks so just live with it chief.
Display MorePlease read what I'm typing and then confirm the difference between PEAK and LONGEVITY.
Those are two entirely different conversations.
Shaq has one of the most dominant PEAKS in NBA History, rivaled only by Michael Jordan.
But his PEAK was just about 3-4 years.
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, until LeBron James, had the greatest LONGEVITY as a top player, giving valuable minutes for 20 years.
Leaving sports aside and returning to K-Pop, it's the same logic. If this was a conversation about the totality of the groups' careers, then of course nobody has matched SNSD
But this is about the groups at their peak popularity in Korea, so how long it's SUSTAINED doesn't matter
The framing here isn't to wonder who was at the top for the longest, but who reached the highest in comparison to SNSD.
I hope this makes more sense to you and anyone else who may be confused now. I was going to leave it alone, but people misconstruing peak with longevity infuriates and triggers me as a sports fan.
Weird of you to go on this rant responding to the one user who clearly did understand what peak meant. Perhaps you need to read what people are actually typing.
the comments on r/blackpink are already making me hope this isn't true
manifesting chart topping bangers for BABYMONSTER and Meovv next comeback 
please try to contain your excitement.
Btw any news about when they'll cb as in kr release??? I'm kinda expecting them to hit their biggest the next cb, idk, I think they have a big chance...
I'm not aware of anything official but right now there is a gap between their touring schedule from july-august so we are all expecting it around then. That would make the most sense. I also feel like they will hit big with this 1, I hope it's closer to Drip than Sheesh in terms of sound but we'll see. Hopefully doesn't overlap with BP's comeback too much but this may be the only time ever we see them have comebacks so close to each other which is cool.
In recent BABYMONSTER news, they did an english interview, collab'd with HK Mcdonalds, announced the release of their first JP single on 5/07, and continue to take over JP with their concerts.
Monstiez Taglist
