I dont care what it offers, as long as it offers it without corrupting and breaking what they shouldnt touch.
Posts by paia
-
-
You defend lotr casting black actors. So yes, you do.
People who defend blackwashing? Leftists and their allies if you want. Not that hard to guess.
-
-
I don't know who this "y'all" you keep referring to is. I have never said any of those things. Please quote one single time I have ever said that.
So stop putting words in my mouth.
The only one I see here screaming, is you. And it's blatant generalizations at that.
Lmao. You were so quick to insert yourself in this discussion to defend blackwashing, with the usual bullshit people lile you use to justify replacing white characters in their own lore, yet act as if you don't know how this whole blackwashing thing has been going?
-
When did I ever say whitewashing a character is breaking the lore? Please point that out to me.
Don't put words in my mouth because you want to be edgy and confrontational.
Dont act dense. Yall scream at the slighest idea that a white women may be cast into a modern role: yet defend blackwashing medieval characters set in a very specific european cultural setting.
Yall screamed about a few background actors in Aladdin, who no one will even slightly see on screen, and who are only there to create a crowd effect at a cheaper price with all on screen roles being brown or black, being a few white men. And now the same people defend putting at the very front of european medieval setting several blackwashed characters.
Hell, yall even insisted fucking lions in africa must be ecclusively voiced by black actor and not even one white person: yet for some reason even cultural characters in medieval europe must be played by black actors?
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dont watch it if it bothers you! It's okay, I'm sure it will do well. Us Americans like to diversify casts because we think representation in media matters. This is a fantasy show anyway, so I'm sure it wont do any harm. Hamilton the musical was diversified and that was based on historical events, yet it did great. Suffice to say I think this isn't a big deal at all
Lol yet you cried tears of blood because a white woman played a modern robot?
There shouldnt be black and asian people en european medieval setting. End.
-
Ah yes the most unbelievable part of a fantasy work is that black people exist.
And there are Asian characters in the Lord of the Rings... Orcs are based on WWII era Japanese racism. They're literally described as being "sallow-skinned and slant eyed"
Stop with the bullshit. Wakanda and ghost in the shell are fantasy too, doesnt keep you from crying at the mere idea alone that white people will be cast in it
The nerve
-
This year when a 12 years old white child in the US simply waiting for his food at Mcdonalds got stabbed multiple times in the neck by a grown man screaming slurs against white people, and keeping screaming slurs after he walked away, major media outlets like CNN never mentioned that fact and said "motive is unknown", and it wasn't considered a hate crime by the justice system either.
Or, when in the UK, groups of hundreds migrant men specifically targeted thousands of underage white girls for years, raped and tortured them and killed some, calling them "white slags", "white whores who only deserve to be raped and are only good for those men to use", the justice system and the media said it wasn't racist, there wasn't anything racial about it - what was actually racist is calling out the men who did it. A british mp retweeted that "those white girls should shut up in the name of diveristy", and she is still in her top poltical position, no one said anything to her.
-
Korea is still very conservative and traditional… expect a lot of Idols not really going in line with western ideologies or aren’t supporting most of it. 🤷🏽♀️
PS… they would most likely not be openly vocal about it either.
Lgbtq is not a western ideology.
-
-
trying to twist words by proving a point?? delusional??? can't accept that ur wrong?? what is this blasphemy??
lots of contradictions right now
No contradictions there.
Blonde hair and blue eyes is a trait of white people.
like no one goes to deny monolid eyes is an asian trait despite other groups having it too. Yet people screamed asian washing juste because some white girls dyed their black (which white people also have btw and not only by 1*10^-999%) and made the almond eyes makeup.
Or no one goes out of their way saying darkening your skin darker than olive tone isn't trying to look like black people despite black people not being the only race that can have very dark skin.
So, if yall would be consistent, which you arent for some reasons, in all objectivity, blonde hair and blue are associated with one race, white ppl.
So next.
-
anyways, no one is trying to say blonde hair and white eyes isn't a phenotype associated with European ppl. What they are pointing out is that these features can also be found in other groups. You stated that it is false, which is a categorically untrue statement.
Also, I think it would be best if you read all of kori's and Sandy's arguments instead of getting hung up on the blonde hair and blue eyes aspect.
That goes literally for any racial trait. You're just trying to twist things to your way.
-
The ethnic Miao people of Guizhou province from China, a subgroup of Hmong people, have been described as having blue eyes and blonde hair.
and it's not albinism etc, it's actually a recessive gene.
blonde hair and blue eyes in the first place was a genetic mutation that was then selected for.
There has been race mixing with white people in china even before our era began. The blonde hair is also found in some isolated tribe which only confirms this, along with the fact that it is such a small percentage that it can't be considered significant.
Averagr picture of miao:
Meanwhile:
Next.
Btw same argument could be made with black skin and the girl in the thumbnail if you were consistent.
-
-
No need to, you just need to use basic logic.