NYCity (USA) = Kai Cenat = Riot Bungle in the Jungle ; 2023.08.06

Wow Jethrow Tull is great.

heh fitting lyrics for the Rioting. Out of control rioters acting like a Jungle mob.

All over a free Playstation promised by the influencer. Had an amusing thought. A Skunk has set up residence in the Yard. Couple times a week the Skunk lets loose on dogs and people. Heh other night a commotion of shouting and car doors slamming nextdoor. A few minutes later ground zero skunk smell is in the air.

Idea for Riot control, toss a few Skunks in the crowd. XD

the question is what is the criteria for "inciting" a riot

if he held a gathering and the people who came started doing shit can the influencer be "blamed"

Quote from krell

USA uses *English Common Law* = What would a *REASONABLE PERSON* do under a certain circumstance(s).

Is it *reasonable* to promise a *free* PLAYSTATION 'Game Device' to 'everyone' when you *know* that there are NOT enough available to 'go around' to everyone who might show up for one ??? ...

But yes , KAI CENAT will use the 'How could I have known (anticipated)' defense.

Australia is common law as well but isn't inciting more than merely organising an event but should include some element of active participation or something?

like trump and jan 6 for example...

Quote from krell

Okay , this aspect of *U.K. COMMON LAW* (Incite to Riot) is *controversial* ...
You get involved in IF that there is a *UNBROKEN CHAIN of (Related) EVENTS* that takes place ... Which , TRUMP will (future) argue in USA COURT that IF he did something (said something) , it did NOT *DIRECTLY* cause the Jan. 6th RIOT to take place , and that was NOT his intention (D.C. RIOT) either ... Obviously , PROSECUTORS of TRUMP will argue *differently* ...
The same aspect applies to KAI CENAT = Did he have an *idea* that what he was doing it could cause a NYC RIOT to take place ??? ... Should KAI CENAT have *reasonably* seen RIOT as a possible outcome of his *MESSAGING* behavior ???

That will be for a JUDGE to decide it ...

The classic example referenced = Is it OKAY to shout *FIRE !!!* in a crowded movie theater , and then people react and trample each other to death trying to FLEE the FIRE that is NOT actually there ... In general , *not* okay is how JUDGE would likely see it.

makes sense makes sense