MUSK TWITTER = Trust *ME* = I *OWN* IT ; 2022.12.13

    considering the last head of the Trust and Safety argued in favor of child p*RN on the platform and they were accused by multiple people of not fighting it to remove it off the platform. Think they need a reboot.

    Quote from krell

    MUSK seems definitely 'off track' in certain ways with TWITTER ...
    He is bringing in his *SPACE-X* employees to work at TWITTER ???
    It all seems *confusing* to me.


    Kataphract <--

    he's building remolding everything into his own mental image. Twitter being short on critical staff is one of the side effects of that so the technologically sophisticated workforce he has is spaceX


    imo he needs to slow down and keep his personal thoughts out of it.

    Quote from Kataphract

    (MUSK = TWITTER changes) = he needs to slow down ...

    ... Yes , I thought as , for MUSK about TWITTER , why not just do *small* changes at first ... And take time (MUSK) to figure out just where the *MONEY CASH FLOW* (PROFIT) gets created in TWITTER currently (before MUSK purchased TWITTER) ... I would take say *ONE YEAR* (MUSK) to try and get a *better* idea of the *current* employees , and how they 'fit' into generating PROFITS (MONEY) at TWITTER.

    ... Instead , MUSK seems *all* about INTIMIDATION of employees who were the ones that were involved in *creating* a *successful* TWITTER , that MUSK paid *$44 BILLION* USD to purchase it ... I find it *confusing* what MUSK is doing it , at this point , with TWITTER.
    ... Then again , *not* everyone is as *wealthy* and successful as MUSK ... So , just because I *personally* do not 'get it' about what MUSK is 'doing it' with TWITTER , proves NOT that much , is how that I see it ... :wink:


    Kataphract <--

    Quote from krell

    ... Yes , I thought as , for MUSK about TWITTER , why not just do *small* changes at first ... And take time (MUSK) to figure out just where the *MONEY CASH FLOW* (PROFIT) gets created in TWITTER currently (before MUSK purchased TWITTER) ... I would take say *ONE YEAR* (MUSK) to try and get a *better* idea of the *current* employees , and how they 'fit' into generating PROFITS (MONEY) at TWITTER.

    ... Instead , MUSK seems *all* about INTIMIDATION of employees who were the ones that were involved in *creating* a *successful* TWITTER , that MUSK paid *$44 BILLION* USD to purchase it ... I find it *confusing* what MUSK is doing it , at this point , with TWITTER.
    ... Then again , *not* everyone is as *wealthy* and successful as MUSK ... So , just because I *personally* do not 'get it' about what MUSK is 'doing it' with TWITTER , proves NOT that much , is how that I see it ... :wink:


    Kataphract <--

    how I see it he wants to do what he did to tesla or spacex and do it to twitter. but those two companies are fundamentally different. SpaceX and Tesla are physical product companies and Twitter is a online services company. Its much less tangible for workers to rally under.

    Quote from Kataphract

    SpaceX and Tesla are physical product companies (whereas) Twitter is a online services company (different style business).

    Yes , I think that you are completely *on target* with what you said it above ... Which is *why* that I was suggesting for MUSK to just go *slow* on changes with TWITTER ... Plus , these (Euro) EU COMMISSION *changes* = *New Laws* and (Euro) monitoring of TWITTER being activated over the next two years ... Do you , MUSK , want to seem as the person who 'comes off' as the 'champion' of 'anything goes' (mostly) in TWITTER message posting ... It just seems as NOT a good idea overall , and in particular at THIS TIME ... But , again , MUSK is *very* wealthy and successful ... So , what do I know.

    Quote from krell

    Yes , I think that you are completely *on target* with what you said it above ... Which is *why* that I was suggesting for MUSK to just go *slow* on changes with TWITTER ... Plus , these (Euro) EU COMMISSION *changes* = *New Laws* and (Euro) monitoring of TWITTER being activated over the next two years ... Do you , MUSK , want to seem as the person who 'comes off' as the 'champion' of 'anything goes' (mostly) in TWITTER message posting ... It just seems as NOT a good idea overall , and in particular at THIS TIME ... But , again , MUSK is *very* wealthy and successful ... So , what do I know.

    unfortunately he isn't as "everything goes" as he markets himself to be.


    He's done a TON of censorship since he took power in twitter.

    the famous example being the censorship of musk critics from within.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login