HWANG HANA = *32 Months* Total PRISON Time ; S.K Supreme Court Appeals Decision ; (JYJ) Yoochun ex-GF ; 2022.02.04

--- Begin ---

www.allkpop.com/article/2021/01/hwang-ha-na-the-granddaughter-of-namyang-dairy-products-founder-arrested-and-indicted-on-charges-of-drug-administration-and-theft

Hwang Ha Na, the Granddaughter of Namyang Dairy Product's founder,

arrested and indicted on charges of illegal drugs usage and theft ; 2021.01.29

---

www.allkpop.com/article/2021/07/3rd-generation-chaebol-hwang-hana-sentenced-to-2-years-in-prison-for-second-illegal-drug-use-offense

3rd Generation Chaebol Hwang Ha Na sentenced to 2 years in prison for

(repeat) second illegal drug use offense (Original TRIAL) ; 2021.07.09

---

www.allkpop.com/article/2021/10/i-will-get-rid-of-my-cell-phone-and-move-to-the-countryside-hwang-ha-na-pleas-for-leniency-during-her-appeals-trial

"I will get rid of my cell phone and move to the countryside," Hwang Ha Na pleas for leniency during her Appeals TRIAL ; 2021.10.29

---

Okay , AKP Article information notes that HWANG HA NA was sentenced

*previously* to *ONE YEAR in PRISON* , that was *converted* instead

to *2 YEARS PROBATION* = NO PRISON TIME.

---

So , for the PROBATION VIOLATION , as she did do that ...

She gets the *12 Months* PRISON Punishment Duration for that ...

For her 2nd *New Offending Illegal Drugs Event* ...

Involving the repeat illegal drugs usage , and the death of her husband ...

It was determined THAT is worthy of *20 Months* in PRISON (*normal* APPEALS COURT). And the S.K SUPREME COURT did *validate* that *20 Months* Prison Punishment Duration.

---

So , you have it as -->

*12 Months* for the PROBATION VIOLATION on the 1st Drug Offense.

*20 Months* for the 2nd New Illegal Drugs Usage Offense.

Thus , *32 Months* in PRISON as Total Punishment Duration Time

for HWANG HA NA ... I believe that this would be correct ...

So , a *CONSECUTIVE* YEARS Prison Punishment Duration logic.

---

So , HWANG HA NA got officially *HOLDING JAIL* ARRESTED on 2021.01.29 ... And I do NOT believe that she was ever RELEASED from JAIL again.

So , she was in the HOLDING JAIL during TRIAL until 2021.07.09 date.

And then PRISON (transferred as GUILTY) since the July 2021 date.

So , about *ONE YEAR* in PRISON duration already served for HWANG HA NA.

---

*Assuming* that she *likely* gets *credit* for her HOLDING JAIL Duration Time ... Then , as of 2022.02.01 , HWANG HA NA will still need to serve

in PRISON Time Duration , the *20 Months* more that she did APPEAL it

to the S.K SUPREME COURT , and have that validated by them.

So, HWANG HA NA would normally be released from PRISON , by my figuring , on about *October 1, 2023* , by my calculations ... Again this *assumes* that she gets *credit* for her HOLDING JAIL Time during her TRIAL of Year 2021.

---

So , the S.K SUPREME COURT did *not* actually 'add on' for HWANG HA NA, the *12 Months* PRISON concerning her PROBATION VIOLATION , it was ALWAYS present. That is my *current* perception of the situation for HWANG HA NA.

--- End ---

--- Begin ---

It has *always* been the situation with using S.K APPEALS COURT.

That it is *possible* for INCREASED time in PRISON as a result of it.

The APPEALS COURT looks at the SAME EVIDENCE that was assembled

by the TRIAL process of the *Original* COURT , which already set

the PRISON Duration Punishment ... And then , the APPEALS COURT JUDGE

has the SAME OPTIONS for PUNISHMENT as apply under S.K LAW.

So , for HWANG HA NA , I believe that to VIOLATE her PROBATION ...

which she DID that , it was a *ONE YEAR PRISON* punishment option , as COURT suggested when she was originally placed instead on *TWO YEARS PROBATION* (NO PRISON Time).

...

So , in this PARTICULAR situation , with HWANG HA NA , it *appears* that

the *12 Months* of PRISON Duration , involving the PROBATION VIOLATION , did ALREADY exist under the *normal* APPEALS COURT event ... So , the *12 Months* was ALWAYS there ... The *normal* APPEALS COURT decided on *20 Months* PRISON Punishment Duration for the *New Illegal Drugs Usage Event* ... And that was then *verified* by the S.K SUPREME COURT APPEALS event

...

In other words , HWANG HA NA could APPEAL the PRISON Punishment Duration of the *New Illegal Drugs Usage Event* (20 Months) ... BUT , she was NOT able to APPEAL the *12 Months* PRISON Punishment Duration involving the aspect of PROBATION VIOLATION from her 1st Illegal Drugs Usage Event ... That *12 Months* was a *decided* already situation.
...
So , HWANG HA NA got punished for *20 Months* in PRISON , for what she did it in the CURRENT situation (illegal drugs usage , her husband is suicide dead) ... And then , as a *separate* added situation , there is the PROBATION VIOLATION too , from HER PREVIOUS Illegal Drugs Usage , and that was automatically *12 MONTHS* PRISON Duration Punishment for that.

Which , all of this CHATTERING from me , is probably WAY MORE than you wanted to read it ... So I did put it into a SPOILER too (LOL) ...

--- End ---

--- Begin ---

Yes , that has *always* been the situation with using S.K APPEALS COURT.

That it is *possible* for INCREASED time in PRISON as a result of it.

The APPEALS COURT looks at the SAME EVIDENCE that was assembled

by the TRIAL process of the *Original* COURT , which already set

the PRISON Duration Punishment ... And then , the APPEALS COURT JUDGE

has the SAME OPTIONS for PUNISHMENT as apply under S.K LAW.

So , for HWANG HA NA , I believe that to VIOLATE her PROBATION ...

which she DID that , it was a *ONE YEAR PRISON* punishment option , as COURT suggested when she was originally placed instead on *TWO YEARS PROBATION* (NO PRISON Time).

...

So , in this PARTICULAR situation , with HWANG HA NA , it *appears* that

the *12 Months* of PRISON Duration , involving the PROBATION VIOLATION , did ALREADY exist under the *normal* APPEALS COURT event ... So , the *12 Months* was ALWAYS there ... The *normal* APPEALS COURT decided on *20 Months* PRISON Punishment Duration for the *New Illegal Drugs Usage Event* ... And that was then *verified* by the S.K SUPREME COURT APPEALS event

...

In other words , HWANG HA NA could APPEAL the PRISON Punishment Duration of the *New Illegal Drugs Usage Event* (20 Months) ... BUT , she was NOT able to APPEAL the *12 Months* PRISON Punishment Duration involving the aspect of PROBATION VIOLATION from her 1st Illegal Drugs Usage Event ... That *12 Months* was a *decided* already situation.
...
So , HWANG HA NA got punished for *20 Months* in PRISON , for what she did it in the CURRENT situation (illegal drugs usage , her husband is suicide dead) ... And then , as a *separate* added situation , there is the PROBATION VIOLATION too , from HER PREVIOUS Illegal Drugs Usage , and that was automatically *12 MONTHS* PRISON Duration Punishment for that.

Which , all of this CHATTERING from me , is probably WAY MORE than you wanted to read it ... So I did put it into a SPOILER too (LOL) ...

--- End ---