discuss.
because I think it is not fair to use cumulative data.
They should use debut.
discuss.
because I think it is not fair to use cumulative data.
They should use debut.
then that be just who is more privileged lol nope
I was about to say that 😁
then that be just who is more privileged lol nope
This
lmao welcome to how all the awards are calculated
Go back to 2018. If memory serves, MAMA awarded ROTY to Izone over Gidle with Gidle holding a big lead in digitals and fan voting. So MAMA judges can override these 2 factors if they decide to. The problem for New Jeans is their album sales isn't overwhelming IVE sales. IVE also has 2 Izone members so MAMA may not have the motivation to award it to New Jeans.
The name of the award is "Rookie of the Year" not "Best debut of the year".
Imagine if a group smashed out the gate with the best debut possible but then immediately proceeded to flop afterward while other groups with less flashy debut numbers ended up surprassing them.
That would be the dumbest thing ever and furthest thing you can get from fair.
A debut doesn't really mean anything in the grand scheme of things if the overall performance in the year ends up sub par.
in the end the company chose their debut time so has to deal with it
op wants their narratives to win, so the whole system needs to change to fit their dreams
funny how people talk about big 4 privilege.
Do you think a group coming from small/mid company or without privilege like post produce can win over group coming from big 4?? The chance of group without privilege winning over big 4 privilege is extremely low anyway so it doesn't matter if you count debut or everything. Big 4 company group will always win.
Yes.
It's called Rookie of the Year, not Rookie of a few short weeks in August.
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!