When the critics itself also posted with an input of how should the subject improve, then it would be the constructive ones.
Because it didn't just pointing the bad spot, but also giving an "constructive" suggestion.
If it just filled with demeaning words and offers no value, then it just a hatred
Thread
When do you consider something 'hate' and when 'constructive criticism'?
Wondering about that one, because it seems like a fine line that isn't the same to everyone.
Personally, I usually consider 2 criteria:
- if the same sort of comment that a poster made would've been said about that poster's bias, would that poster see it as an affront, attack or shade or as a constructive criticism?
- if a poster keeps on and on in thread after thread about a group's or idol's flaws or lack of success in something, then I don't think it's just criticism anymore.
Personally, I usually consider 2 criteria:
- if the same sort of comment that a poster made would've been said about that poster's bias, would that poster see it as an affront, attack or shade or as a constructive criticism?
- if a poster keeps on and on in thread after thread about a group's or idol's flaws or lack of success in something, then I don't think it's just criticism anymore.
OP