joy in that rainbow dress 
Posts by lashin
-
-
never liked pretty savage,but love to hate me if my favorite kpop song lately
-
-
it looks like she's very popular with chinese teenage girls as well
-
imo
External Content youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
classical latin
-
Man already has the right I told you. To alter his body so that he won’t make a girl pregnant.
HE ALREADY HAS THAT RIGHT.
And, just like women can have both the choice of sterilization and getting rid the child once it’s conceived through abortion, a man should have the same as well - the choice of final sterilization and the choice of not having to take care of it once it’s conceived.
Display MoreAfter a baby is born both parents have to take care of it no two ways about it.
Who said they were the same. I said that’s the only thing a man has control over.
A man doesn’t have a uterus so he can’t get an abortion silly.
The male and female anatomy is DIFFERENT. The ONLY way a man can not get a baby is if he’s sterile. And there is no other option.
If he’s not sterile he has consented to having the baby already.
again, as men get vasectomy, women can get sterilized as well.
-
Display More
A man already consented to taking care of a baby if he doesn’t have a vasectomy. You can’t say you don’t want o “legally” take care of baby just because you don’t want to get a vasectomy.
A woman can consent to having a baby when she doesn’t get an abortion. She can’t give birth and then dump it on the man either.
This is called control over your own bodies.
If the man didn’t get a vasectomy and the woman didn’t get an abortion BOTH of them HAVE to take care of the baby.
Quite simple logic here.
Abortion and vasectomy are uncomparable. Sterilization and refusing a child at one moment of your life under specific circumstances are totally different things.
If there is an abortion, there is no child to take care of. If a child is born, there is a child to take care of . Whether a parent is happy about it or not. That's the difference.
A woman has a choice and autonomy. Isn’t it all what abortion is about? If she knows the man doesn’t want the child yet she still chooses to keep it, then the responsibility is only on her.
Besides, people constantly keep repeating it in debates about abortion, that they aren’t as psychologically damaging and harmful as pro lifers claim etc, which here from both sides only makes things better.
Though, if the man agrees to have the child before abortion limits and changes his mind, or they are in a marriage, then that’s a totally different case.
-
Yes. Many lawmakers, and most just some time ago, also were opposed to abortion. Do they know better as well? Just like laws evolved towards abortion, in the future, men should also have the right to not take care of a child if a woman has the same right as well.
-
He does have the right.
The right to get a vasectomy silly.
He should have both then. the right to get vasectomy and don’t take care of a child he didn’t want.
-
A man shouldn’t have the obligation to take care of a child he didn’t want if the woman has the right to get rid of a child she doesn’t want as well. Stop acting obtuse.
-
Once it is conceived, if a woman has the right to refuse to take care of the child by aborting him for whatever reason, then the man also should have the right to refuse to take care of him for whatever reason.
-
Lmao the Paris they imagine doesn’t exist since at least 30 years anymore.
-
-
that's cute lol
-
-
the argument of "if it’s offensive to them then don’t discuss it and don’t do it” is such bullshit. So now if people tell you that it’s offensive for you to breath, are you gonna stop breathing now?
Not to mention the ignorance of those people themselves.
Like the cases of bulgarian girls attacked and harassed both offline and online for being white and wearing braids from their own culture. And those twitter clowns acting as if they know their culture by using one picture found on google search claiming they were lying based on totally another hairstyle from another region. So now they must reject their own culture just not to offend those people claiming to be woke, are they supposed to just shut up and don’t do it?
Or even muslim kpop stans crying about nct using cupola and dome style architecture in their MV, claiming it belongs to Islamic culture exclusively and those kpop stars are culturally appropriating their culture, while muslim themselves stole it from byzantine christians literally culturally appropriating from them, while colonizing and invading thair lands, killing and enslaving the indigenous people and desecrating their churches to turn into mosque and copying tbeir architecture later for their own buildings (see Hagia Sophia): for them now to claim it exclusively belongs to them. Even had the nerve to say eastern european or gothic architecture were stealing from muslims when they were clearly coming from a long legacy of byzantine architecture and it’s influence in eastern europe especially.
-
forget what I said about blinding lights, lana's chemtrails over the country club us the only good song released lately, still wasn’t even successful. While that ariana’s and olivia crap is on top of charts
-
Blinding lights isn't good tho. The Weeknd is overrated af.
Yea but the rest are even worse. Ariana, billie, olivia...
-
The only good song lately is blinding lights
On a global scale it seems like kpop is also slowly coming for their ass
Discuss!
