Kamala Harris Is Now Making Joe Biden’s Head Of State Calls For Him.

  • https://thenationalpulse.com/n…d-of-state-calls-for-him/


    Vice President Kamala Harris has begun to take calls on behalf of President Joe Biden, raising questions about his ability to do the job of President.


    It states:

    Vice President Kamala Harris spoke today with President Emmanuel Macron of France, and expressed her commitment to strengthening bilateral ties between the United States and France and to revitalizing the transatlantic alliance. Vice President Harris and President Macron agreed on the need for close bilateral and multilateral cooperation to address COVID-19, climate change, and support democracy at home and around the world. They also discussed numerous regional challenges, including those in the Middle East and Africa, and the need to confront them together. The Vice President thanked President Macron for his leadership on the issue of gender equality and for France’s contribution to NASA’s Mars 2020 Perseverance rover.

    It is bizarre for a Vice President to be making contact with key world leaders just weeks into a new administration.

    Harris also recently spoke with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

    The President has also still refused to call the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu. THE WHITE HOUSE READOUT


    In 2020, Biden called himself a “transition candidate,” raising eyebrows about his commitment to the job and his ability to serve his full first term, let alone a potential two.

    Some have also noted how Harris may be setting up to lead the U.S. delegation at the G8 in June, especially if Biden is still busy playing Mario Kart. 



    Joe does not look to good in this video.

    https://rumble.com/vdwa0n-not-…view-biden-interview.html

  • https://rense.com/general96/eos-are-only-legal-if.php


    Executive Orders Are ONLY Legal If They

    Are FULLY SUPPORTED By The US Constitution





    "Basis in the United States Constitution...

    The U.S. Supreme Court has held that all Executive Orders from the United States president must be SUPPORTED BY THE CONSTITUTION, whether from a clause granting specific power or by Congress delegating such to the executive branch." I am interpreting the above statement as depending on the specific Executive Order's CONTENT as it compares to the confines of Constitutional law.

    Suppose a President signs an Executive Order that is clearly unconstitutional, e.g., granting amnesty or citizenship to groups of people living illegally in the geographical United States or taking unilateral military action against another country. In that case, such action should be considered null and void and pushed back by both the U.S. Congress and U.S. Supreme Court.

    Such (illegal) Executive Orders are to be checked by our checks and balances system - at least that's how the Founding Fathers designed our system.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!