would you rather

be talented at mastering everything but not having the potential to be the best at anything

or

have insane potential at something but have to work a lot to get there

Quote from selfmate

what's the difference again?

the first seems that you can just master anything but not be the best right?

the second one is you can be the best but have to work really hard??? so like you don't have to work as hard for the first choice?

yeah

you learn everything with ease but you dont have the raw genetic potential to be the best at it