Posts by ykhar
-
-
Είμαι ο μόνος που πραγματικά δεν τους κάνει να σκατά; Βασικά, η κοινή γνώση εκφοβισμού είναι αχαλίνωτη μεταξύ των παιδιών. Δεν θα σταματήσω κάθε δευτερόλεπτο για την ιστορία του εκφοβισμού κάποιου επειδή θα χρειαστείτε περισσότερες από μία ζωές για να τους ακούσετε όλα. Δεύτερον, ο εκφοβισμός είναι ένα πράγμα, αλλά υπάρχει επίσης ομοφοβία, ρατσισμός, τρανσφοβία, ξενοφοβία, μισογυνία, σεξισμός, προκατάληψη, χρωματισμός, κοινωνιοπάθεια, ηλικιωτισμός, ικανότητα και πολλά άλλα πράγματα που περνούν οι άνθρωποι από τη γέννηση έως το θάνατο. Θα πρέπει απλώς να υποθέσω ότι ο καθένας είναι ένας άθλιος άνθρωπος με τα πονηρά πράγματα που τους συμβαίνουν αντί να κάνω κάποια λογιστική θυμάτων.
-
I saw people sharing this. Gonna read it calmly, 'cause it seems a little bit technical. I'll put in the spoilers since I don't know if this is relevant or not
External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
-
-
Sharing their address to the world is a little dangerous isn't it?
yes. it seems OP2 shared a lot of personal information to prove what they said.
OP2 must really hate OP1
-
a girl I know said that OP2 shared their address as proof... I don't know if it's real, but if it is, things are out of control
-
-
What part?
I think I might have got it now.
OP2 (daum poster) did not attend Burim and is friends with A & B(who actually attended Burim). A & B probably told OP2 about Mingyu and the things they saw (like what happened to C and B himself). then, OP2 made a post detailing Mingyu's school behaviour, as well text messages betwen A & B. the allegations about C were further debunked.
what I didn't get is: are the post and texts proven to be fake? If so, is there a link or something. 'cause all I know is that only the things they said about C are fake
-
-
what a mess, someone on reddit left a summary of what's happening with mingyu's accusers and what they said was op1 framed op2 (op2 posted on pann with their own psychiatric reports) so it's possible op1 is framing mingyu?
accuser who said mingyu bullied disabled student was also revealed to be a friend of a friend of the disabled student? so he/she never witnessed any bullying but he/she keeps insisting that mingyu bullied that student
what? where have you heard that?
also, can you send me the reddit link?
-
Do you know where they said that? I am trying to find it but I can’t find anything, they deleted a lot of their tweets I think.
here!
External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
the translator made a correction. OP1 didn't contact the OP2. OP2 was actually contacted by a friend, who said that there are other victims aside from that friend (now I don't know if they are Mingyu's victims or OP1's victims)
External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.update: the translator said that the victims are Mingyu's victims. people are speculating that it might refer to the previous ones.
-
-
I literally don't know what's happening anymore. I think Pledis might release a new statement until Wednesday
-
So does that mean she agree with OP2’s description of Mingyu? Because if she wanted she would’ve, but she only talked about her issue between OP2.
she ignored Mingyu's description. either she agrees with that or she just forgot.
-
some people are saying that OP1 didn't "debunked" Mingyu's description made by OP2, and she said she hated confrontation and did not want to be contacted by Pledis. now, she wants to. but I guess she might just have forgotten the first point, and changed her mind about the second one. I wonder if any of this has to do with OP2's posts.
today was a weird day, and I'll wait for Pledis statement. hope both parts can talk and come to a conclusion.
-
-
Didn't op1 said she didn't want to be contacted by pledis when she made the initial post tho???
that's what I thought
-
translation - first OP's update
External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.