Posts by yejiglows
-
-
-
-
FoR gIrL gROUps. I said what I said.
But, what you are saying is wrong?! Clowning armys for saying that BTS carry the industry when it's facts. What does Blackpink carry besides YG and a concept? And, the concept doesn't even count because then you could say that Twice is "carrying the industry" as well lol.
-
-
-
-
-
I think that sentence belongs to BTS and BTS only. The kpop industry isn't going to change when BP disbands because they are replaceable. BTS on the other hand is a once in a lifetime type of group.
-
No. She's still a bitch.
-
So Jennie has created a Youtube channel?!
I think that means only one thing if we combined it with her 2019 scandal. Once Rosé makes BP disband so she can live up to her hype as IU's little sister, Jennie is going to leave the idol industry, end up being an irrelevant "ex-idol" vlogger and she'll live off of YG's handouts forever. She's too spoilt to go to any other company and if she leaves YG, Chanel isn't going to care about her. She's already getting treated poorly and it's clear that her contract was a favour because of G-Dragon and CL.
Serves YG right for neglecting Rosé potential since debut.
-
Exactly. So why is huening saying that I'm inserting blinks into everything? Y'all are the ones sitting in every rookie group thread waiting to prove why Blackpink is the revolution. It's like you guys have Blackpink's achievements memorised. Imagine being so lame.
I don't get what you're referring but please do. Embarrass yourself.
The way you guys are proving me right.
-
-
-
-
I'm glad that most female 4th generation idols look healthy and "normal." It seems like companies are aiming for "relatability" now rather than perfection.
-
Do you have to stan a group to be able to mention their name?
I saw on a thread that blinks' were getting mad at an Aespa stan for mentioning Jennie's name when they "don't even stan Blackpink." Why?
Why are kpop stans so protective over their faves and treat them like they are Voldemort? Do you think that you have to stan someone in order to use them as a comparison?
Would I have to stan Exo to be able to say that BTS is better than them?
I don't get it, tbh. Kpop idols are celebrities, you can't control who says their name when it's public information, and it's kind of hypocritical to wish for people to recognise your faves as famous but then not allow for them to say their name and talk about their careers.
I can understand being mad at someone for "setting up an idol" that they aren't even a fan of but when it's a compliment, should you really be gatekeeping who mentions your faves name?
I don't get blinks' specifically that do that. I saw another thread of a blink saying that they are tired of people comparing Jennie to their rookie idols when I can guarantee you that Jennie thinks it's flattering.
All throughout debut, blinks' kept referring to Jennie as "The Female GD." So how come when it's a lesser-known idol, it's forbidden to use Jennie as the greater comparison?
Beyoncé stans don't get bitter over people saying that so and so is "The Next Beyoncé" because they know that Beyoncé won't be replaced that easily. So how come kpop stans start shaking in their boots every time someone puts their faves and another idol in the same sentence?
Do you get mad at people saying that their faves are "The Next" successor of your biased group? Do you take it as a compliment or do you just not care because your faves achievements aren't your own?
I feel like it is different when multiple media articles use a (senior) group's name as clickbait to promote another group as "The Next" version of them. BTS has mentioned it before and I completely understand why they get upset by journalists calling other boy groups that promote in America "The Next BTS." But, can you really be mad at a fan on a forum for using your faves name as a comparison?
Keep in mind that comparisons aren't always bad.