Seoul High Court dismisses Fifty Fifty's appeal for provisional injunction

  • Members of the idol group Fifty Fifty appealed to the court to suspend their exclusive contract with their agency Attract (CEO Jeon Hong-jun), but the appeal was dismissed as they did not provide a written statement of reasons for the appeal.


    On the 24th, Seoul High Court Civil Division 25-2 (Chief Judges Kim Moon-seok, Jeong Jong-gwan, and Song Mi-kyung) dismissed the appeal filed by three Fifty Fifty members against the first trial decision that did not uphold the application for a temporary injunction to suspend the exclusive contract.


    The court announced that it made this decision because the Fifty Fifty side that filed the appeal did not submit a statement of reasons for the appeal and there was no reason to change the lower court's decision.


    On June 19 of this year, Fifty Fifty filed an application for a preliminary injunction requesting termination of the exclusive contract, claiming that Attrakt failed to fulfill its obligation to provide settlement data and to manage the members' physical and mental health, but it was dismissed in August.


    The first trial court said, “It was not confirmed that Fifty Fifty’s income from sales of albums and music or entertainment activities exceeded the costs of production, etc., so it was not confirmed that there was a settlement amount (profits) that Fifty Fifty should have been paid, and it was not confirmed that Fifty Fifty had a settlement amount (proceeds) that should have been paid, and the amount was so high that it destroyed trust.” “It is difficult to conclude that there was a violation of the settlement obligation,” he said, supporting Attract.


    Regarding the claim that the agency violated the members' health management obligations, the court said, "When health problems were confirmed, the agency had members receive hospital treatment, confirmed the diagnosis and progress, and coordinated their activity schedules to schedule medical treatment or surgery. "I didn't accept it."


    Dissatisfied with this decision, all members, including Kina (Song Ja-kyung), Saena (Jeong Se-hyun), Shio (Jung Ji-ho), and Aran (Jung Eun-ah), submitted an immediate appeal to the court on August 31, but this appeal was also dismissed.

    However, one of the members, Kina, announced her intention to withdraw her appeal on the 16th and return to her agency. It was discovered that the remaining three members who did not withdraw their appeal also did not submit a statement of reasons for their appeal containing specific claims.



    피프티 전속계약정지 가처분 항고 기각…"항고이유서 제출안해"(종합) | 연합뉴스
    (서울=연합뉴스) 권희원 기자 = 아이돌그룹 피프티 피프티의 멤버들이 소속사 어트랙트(대표이사 전홍준)와의 전속계약 효력을 중지시켜달라며 법원에...
    www.yna.co.kr

  • With their contracts terminated, there's no injunction or contract to suspend anymore.

    In the hypothetical scenario where the girls filed a statement of appeal and the court deemed it valid, the injunction would go through and they would be off the hook for paying any termination fee (trainee debt). Of course, in real life their case was weak as fuck and the girls didn't file a statement of appeal because they don't have any evidence because ASI lied to them saying that he had the receipts.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!