MUSK = DOXXING Me = *SILENCE* You (News Reporters) on TWITTER ; 2022.12.16

--- Begin ---

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snyder_v._Phelps

Freedom of Speech (Synder vs. Phelps) ; USA ; Info

...

Personally , I *wonder* just how much that MUSK even has any idea of say the above referenced URL case ... Which , NOT sure that MUSK using his TIME to get 'better up to speed' is necessarily a good idea for him either.

===

Anyway , I would *tend* to argue , as did the *BANNED JOURNALISTS* involved with MUSK (TWITTER) , that they only did *reference* via URL a *website* run by an *unrelated* (other) TWITTER USER who was tracking the JET movements of MUSK (via PUBLIC INFORMATION) ... Plus , *other* 'Social Media Sites' (Facebook , Instagram) had websites that also did the SAME thing , sourced from that same individual ... I am *not* so clear that these *BANNED JOURNALISTS* were exactly DOXXING MUSK ... *Maybe* one could argue that they were bringing attention to *public information* in a manner that MUSK did NOT LIKE IT though ... Which , *maybe* MUSK needs to SAY it , as far as HE PERSONALLY is concerned , *his* personal information , that MUSK will close ANY TWITTER ACCOUNT as HE SEES FIT ... After all , MUSK does OWN TWITTER ... One of the journalists (CNN NEWS one ???) who had their TWITTER account closed , had been covering MUSK for YEARS (posting news articles about him) ... WHY not just SAY in a MESSAGE that you DELETED the offending information ... And IF you keep posting it , you get maybe ONE MORE WARNING , and THEN the TWITTER ACCOUNT gets CLOSED ... It is definitely an inconvenience for a NEWS WRITER that has had a TWITTER account open for a LONG TIME , to have it CLOSED ... Or maybe just *suspend* the TWITTER account , so that INFORMATION that was NOT OFFENDING is still accessible (viewable) ??? ... Anyway , NOT bothered that much (here , me) that MUSK = TWITTER TYRANT now ... Or surprised either ... But , I would add , that MUSK himself , HIS TIME involved in *censorship* issues , is likely a WASTE of his time mostly.
... And , MUSK should have realized that , by taking over TWITTER , and starting to *tell* others what they can and cannot SAY it , would *increase* PROBLEMS for him in the conduct of his PRIVATE LIFE ... Selling PRODUCTS (TESLA) is one thing ... Getting involved in *Freedom of Speech* issues , is quite another ... What comes out of it all for me , is MUSK = Egomaniac in a lot of ways ... Freedom of Speech issues are *very* complex ones (see Synder vs. Phelps , above) ... And MUSK seems to have this notion that it is all 'Oh so simple and obvious what to do' (about Freedom of Speech) ... Which , those who actually work jobs as *News Reporters* , seem to find MUSK as fairly arrogant overall , not surprisingly , to me.

... Anyway , this is *way more* answer than I should even post it ... And NOT going to say much more on it ... Maybe just do a 'REACT' , that I did READ a REPLY , if that I get one (doubt it) ... Again , people 'go around' on these *Freedom of Speech* issues forever ... Finally , no 'big insult' intended by what I said it here.

--- End ---