https://n.news.naver.com/mnews…le/009/0004780790?sid=102
However, B [witness/victim] said he had no idea about the relationship between the incident and seungri until he was investigated by the police in February last year. "I didn't know who was in the room," said B.
"I thought it was a drinking party happening and forgot about it for five years."
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews…le/009/0004780790?sid=102
What caught the eye was that A [witness/victim] had worked with Seungri on business even after the incident, saying, "I apologized at the time that I was sorry." A said, "It is true that there was personal damage because the incident went wrong at the time, but it was not due to seungri." "I don't want the punishment of seungri, and I told the investigative agency that way."
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews…le/009/0004780790?sid=102
Victim A, who attended the trial earlier in the day, said about the trouble with Seungri in the inner room of the bar, "I tried to find an acquaintance who went with me, but opened the door to the room where Seungri was." Seungri made a bad expression and I said, "Why are you staring at me?" and I tried to lecture my young friend because his attitude was not good. It is true that I made the first quarrel.
He said, "I didn't know at first who it was because Seungri was wearing a hat at that time. he kept lowering his head, so I said, "this can't be" and "you need to get hit a bit" when he raised his head, that's when I realized that it was seungri. I introduced after that, I apologized, shook hands, hugged each other and reconciled.
[also how is this guy even called a victim - he testifies that he went into a private room and started a quarrel all by himself. wtf is this.]
so Mnet aired that performance, and to think they refused to play Mino's fiance MV because of a dance sequence they deemed too suggestive or whatever - I feel there is no logic or rule or ethics to any of it - I think if they don't like you they'll make any rubbish reason to create problems - it seems knetz works the same way.
this 2 second dance of mino's with a female dancer is what mnet wanted to censor - ****ing hypocrites:
https://businessmirror.com.ph/…eveals-confirmation-bias/
diamond no ace and haikyu
https://n.news.naver.com/entertain/article/241/0003105018
On this day, the judge adjusted the schedule for the next witness testimony, saying, "Today is the 14th trial, and 19 witnesses have finished the testimony. Until today, there are 22 people."
Seungri's legal representative asked the military judge, "Since there is a private trial schedule [i'm not sure what they mean by private schedule] and the seungri is scheduled to come at 5 am, please reduce the hearing date as much as possible." Accordingly, it was adjusted from a weekly hearing to a biweekly hearing schedule.
Choi Jong-hoon and Kwon are scheduled to appear as witnesses on the 29th. The judge said, "Because it is part of cooperation with the prison, it will be difficult to change this schedule."
Yoo In-seok, a former CEO of Yuri Holdings, who is known as Seungri's business partner, will be scheduled to attend on May 20.
(there is something about the schedule for incitement to assault charge that i don't quite understand - so i'll wait for proper translation.)
(EDIT: private schedule = separate trial in civilian court - also it's not about seungri but some of the witnesses set to testify)
a mod explained how here:
forum.allkpop.com/thread/?postID=176842#post176842bringing up the latest hearing/update
External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.I've reposted an updated/corrected version of the article by the translator @BB_VIP5ever95 there was a mistake in the last part of paragraph 7. (so the tweet posted above actually has the old translation (with the error) and below is the actual updated/corrected translation)
it's nearly 18:00 KST - I doubt there are going to be anymore articles, this may be the only coverage this hearing gets (considering that there have been several hearing where there was zero news coverage).
Display Morethere was another article today where witness Ms. C (prostitute) said police records are different from actual statements made ands that she never said that she was in seungri's car (as police claim) :
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews…le/009/0004769639?sid=102
External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.External Content twitter.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
THIS IS A MUST READ ARTICLE THAT POINTS OUT HOW SEVERAL WITNESSES HAVE TESTIFIED THAT POLICE STATEMENTS DIFFER FROM WHAT THEY ACTUALLY SAID OR MEANT TO SAY
although I wouldn't say just korea, it's anytime that the police let's media speculation (and mob appeasement) and their own battered egos drive an investigation instead of facts that they end up being a ****ing circus.
