im not really concerned, i dont care that much actually. jisoo or even hain will still have a fine live with all their money even if this would have been the last entertainment they would do.
Its sad that the staff and actors worked hard to give us entertainment... but i mean not this kind of entertainment... and than we complain why companies are so carefully and dont let their artists do anything anymore.
i guess i just get angry at unproven hatetrains since t-ara gets ruined and this hometown chachacha guy recently remined me on that again.
more then enough but as example take cloy. Getting democracy is like 30 years ago. but the division is still ongoing. it is also very serious situation since both countries are still at war. main lead and his friends are shown like super hereos while we have reports from refugees who descriped nk soldiers as very hostile even to the own population, mainly due to the hard circumstances they live under. this is very offensive tokoreans who have lost family members or suffered under the nk army. also showing the army who is the main thread to the country in such a positive light could make it harder for their own soldiers to fight against them in case that is needed. The movie could have brough massive danger to the safety of the country. its also very dissorting history. i mean come on. hyung bin should be a soldier in the nk army? are you for real?
No one even blame the staff or actors (well they blame Jung Haein but that is totally on him) so what is this "pity them" narrative of yours??? The director and the writer with the production is the one being on the hot seat. If the drama gets cancelled, the staff will still get their pay.
You really don't have an understanding of creative changes can send certain messages.
CLOY took into account that they wanna show the real lives of the villages of North Korea, that the country is not just the regime. Many NK refugees that ran away from NK to SK state CLOY showed something of greater value, that NK is still Korea, and the people is not that different. They also showed that teenage boys are put into military without consent, that's the harsh reality SK people didn't know, and that they don't even ask for viewers to decide if its right or wrong, they just ask viewers to have some empathy to those NK people tighten under the regime. People forget the first victim of the NK regime is the NK citizens.
Does the message of the drama change the history about the regime? No, the regime is still bad, the couple had to go to a neutral country Swiss to actually be together and they didn't even hide the probability of the soldiers getting killed upon return in NK. They didn't get killed but is it because the regime is kind? No, its because they strategise everything to be kept under wraps from the upper regime to find out. There is no distortion of history, the regime is still bad, and NK SK is still at war. Nothing changed. That was the point.
While...
History: The authoritarian government through the NSP excused murders of the SK students in 1987 because according to them there is alleged NK spies in the democracy movement when there is none.
Snowdrop: Yeah In 1987 THERE IS NK soldier in the democracy protest so this saying that the NSP is kind of right to those murders.
This simple change made in SD had distorted the history.
If you don't understand why one change is okay and one is not, simply go to the last part of "What kind of message these changes give?" If you don't understand this then just don't even ask why some people are offended.