Can people stop conflating talent with skill, or acting as if either is key to success?
Talent refers to an innate, born with ability. Period. A talent is a lucky genetic accident that makes certain people have better signing abilities, or dancing abilities, or the ability to play some particular instrument than the common, average person.
Skill is a measure of proficiency, of how well someone can complete a task. Skill comes from practice and repetition, from hours invested in hard work. Any person can gain skill if they invest the time.
There are a lot of talented people and there are a lot of skilled people, and then there are those who are both talented and skilled.
Generally, to be able to succeed in a field, you need one or the other, and its best to have both, but having either is no key to success. There are plenty of opera folks or music theater people who can sing circles around anyone in popular music - that in an of itself won't make them stars.
I will note that the different relationship between artists and their labels in the US as opposed to South Korea might very well be part of why people in the West denigrate Kpop. No one in the US gives a crap which label their favorite artist is with. The very notion of a company Stan in US pop music is absurd, and yet, Kpop strongly revolves around Companies. That makes Kpop seem a lot more, well, openly and obviously a business. The idea of people on a US pop forum going on about the share price of the different labels and how a specific artist might affect that? Unheard of, and honestly, think about it - arguing how well your group does in terms of Corporate ROI does make it seem like the music is perhaps not what truly matters.