I get Quantity.
Quality argument doesn't hold much significance since it's all subjective.
I get Quantity.
Quality argument doesn't hold much significance since it's all subjective.
They have 21 original songs, 23 if you count KAMU and SC.
songs of their OWN
ic aand byw are also collabs
Are you sure you are a blink? How can you not know the number of songs uploaded on your fave’s Spotify profile?? At least even I know they have more than 50 uploads if you just count from their albums
it was a joke damn
they have 19 songs 23 if u count their collabs
songs of their OWN
ic aand byw are also collabs
collabs are their own songs. features aren’t.
ice cream and sour candy are collabs and are their songs
bet you wanna is blackpink feat cardi so it is also their song
the only one that isn’t a blackpink song is kiss and make up. it’s a dua song that they feature on.
without it they still have 22 original songs
Display Morecollabs are their own songs. features aren’t.
ice cream and sour candy are collabs and are their songs
bet you wanna is blackpink feat cardi so it is also their song
the only one that isn’t a blackpink song is kiss and make up. it’s a dua song that they feature on.
without it they still have 22 original songs
well i dont see collabs as their own songs
idk why yall took my comment seriously
Display More??
Whistle
Boombayah
Stay
DDDD
Forever Young
Really Really
See you later
KTL
Kick it
Don't know what to do
Hope not
+ 8 songs from The Album
= 21 songs
19 songs
i have zero idea why everyone's quoting me
just take one look at my dp and it should be easy to tell that im trolling
Out of curiosity. What program did you use to illustrate your plots? It looks like R to me
Its google sheets
I did use R for the clustering!
19 songs
u cant change my mind
I get Quantity.
Quality argument doesn't hold much significance since it's all subjective.
The KMAs determine quality and there is nothing subjective about them. Critics and music experts are not the fans. They know best.
I'm not following the quality part..
isnt that subjective? I personally think there are several groups with overall better quality... not sure what critera you are using this graph is a bit confusing for me.
KMAs nominations are based on critics and reflect quality very well, especially for more successful groups who are on their radar.
Quality is always subjective, but critical acclaim is the only thing even approaching objectivity in that area. It helps that current result (KMAs) is backed up by reviews scores (f(x) and BTS getting the best scores generally).
I get Quantity.
Quality argument doesn't hold much significance since it's all subjective.
Really, then how are you always calling your opinion on Exo's music FACT?
Screenshot_20210220-140841_Chrome.jpg
Atleast OP used data based on KMAs which is as unbiased, objective and expert we can get on quality of music.
Korean digitals is based on Gaon end of year charts (100 points for #1, 1 point for #100) and Melon end of year chart before 2010. Thats because digital index only exists since 2018 and i wanted to have something comparable long term.
Korean digitals is based on Gaon end of year charts (100 points for #1, 1 point for #100) and Melon end of year chart before 2010. Thats because digital index only exists since 2018 and i wanted to have something comparable long term.
Thanks!
I get Quantity.
Quality argument doesn't hold much significance since it's all subjective.
Well then. This makes your existence on akp pretty redundant then
Really, then how are you always calling your opinion on Exo's music FACT?
Screenshot_20210220-140841_Chrome.jpg
Atleast OP used data based on KMAs which is as unbiased, objective and expert we can get on quality of music.
I think they consider themselves a higher authority on music than actual music critics who judge quality on a daily basis professionally and have generally been listening to wide variety of music for years or decades.
Really, then how are you always calling your opinion on Exo's music FACT?
Screenshot_20210220-140841_Chrome.jpg
Atleast OP used data based on KMAs which is as unbiased, objective and expert we can get on quality of music.
According to Dani boy, his opinions are facts and KMA’s are not. So many special users in this thread :)
To argue against data you need another data. Numbers against numbers.
It seems that it's a strange concept here since some users go by this:
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!