All I want is new NJZ music sometime next year that’s all.
It'll happen. Just gotta give all the bruhaha some time to settle first 😉
All I want is new NJZ music sometime next year that’s all.
It'll happen. Just gotta give all the bruhaha some time to settle first 😉
It'll happen. Just gotta give all the bruhaha some time to settle first 😉
It’s going to happen. If ablume (former members of FIFTY FIFTY) could redebut and make it happen, a group as big as NewJeans also can.
actually i would disagree with this
True the procedure was the right one they made their demands, wait for some time for HYBE to fulfill their demands and when it wasn't the case they consider their contract expire
The problem isn't on the procedure it's more on the substance
These types of demands happen when one party doesn't respect their contractual obligations
In this case the victim ask for the other parts to fulfill their demands and respect the contract to continue the contract
But some of Newjeans claims had nothing to do with their contract
None of them had any link to their contract
Nothing in their contract mention that NJ is a group that will exclusively work with MHJ or Dolphin studio
And for the manager apology there's no proof that this incident happen
So a judge consider that a person doesn't have to publicly apologize for something that they might have not done
A judge can easily consider that these demands from Newjeans were made with a lack of good faith because it look like they only took advantage of the situation to put pressure on HYBE to bring back MHJ.
+ Consider that it's a show of bad faith that they made such demands that for some were clearly impossible to fulfill for HYBE
Which could be a big disadvantage for NJ cuz all contracts needs to be sign and execute with good faith, it's one of the most important contractual principle.
Because this type of demand should be reasonable and be made in hope to continue the contractual relationship between both party.
In their case NJ demands seems exaggerated and the judge can consider that by doing this they knew that HYBE couldn't meet their demands and the contract will be "expire"
Which is another sign of bad faith cuz a judge can say " ok but it seems that you clearly went ahead with this demand because it's the procedure, but based on the substance of your demands it looks like you never wanted to repair the contractual relationship with HYBE"
And also that all these demands have no direct link to the contract so they should have never been made
Also the girls can't even raise the argument to say " yeah but we sign the contract because MHJ was the CEO of ador ".
A party's motive for entering into a contract is generally irrelevant to its legal enforceability, unless explicitly incorporated into the contract's terms
Display MoreActually, I would disagree with this
True the procedure was the right one they made their demands, waited for some time for Ador to fulfil their demands and when it wasn't the case they considered their contract had expired.
The problem isn't with the procedure it's more with the substance.
These types of demands happen when one party doesn't respect their contractual obligations.
In this case, the victim asks for the other party to fulfil their demands and respect the contract to continue the contract.
But some of Newjeans' claims had nothing to do with their contract.
- Like asking to bring back MHJ as CEO
- Asking you to bring back the CEO of the dolphin company that produced their music video
- Or even asking for an apology from the manager who asked another idol not to greet Hanni
None of them had any link to their contract
Nothing in their contract mentions that NJ is a group that will exclusively work with MHJ or Dolphiners.
And for the manager's apology, there's no proof that this incident happened
So a judge considers that a person doesn't have to publicly apologise for something that they might not have done.
A judge can easily consider that these demands from Newjeans were made with a lack of good faith because it looks like they only took advantage of the situation to put pressure on HYBE to bring back MHJ. Also, consider that it's a show of bad faith that they made such demands that for some were clearly impossible to fulfil for Ador.
Which could be a big disadvantage for NJ cuz all contracts need to be signed and executed with good faith, it's one of the most important contractual principles.
Because this type of demand should be reasonable and be made in the hope of continuing the contractual relationship between both parties.
In their case, NJ's demands seem exaggerated and the judge can consider that by doing this they knew that Ador couldn't meet their demands and the contract will be "expired".
Which is another sign of bad faith cuz a judge can say " ok but it seems that you clearly went ahead with this demand because it's the procedure, but based on the substance of your demands it looks like you never wanted to repair the contractual relationship with Ador".
And also that all these demands have no direct link to the contract so they should have never been made.
Also, the girls can't even raise the argument to say, "yeah but we signed the contract because MHJ was the CEO of Ador".
A party's motive for entering into a contract is generally irrelevant to its legal enforceability, unless explicitly incorporated into the contract's terms.
Not denying that some of the substance of their demands wasn't doable, but something like taking action against malicious comments and launching an investigation into the leakage of those trainee videos was within their remit.
Having MHJ as CEO is doable by the board, but it would be for Hybe to sign off on it, which they would not, and by the board voting for her, it would be defying what Hybe had already done.
Display MoreWhich AKP Tokki best represents your views?
hey where's the selfie FENCE-SITTING option????
Just to be clear on my stance:
Nobody should be able to abuse a contract. An artist shouldnt be able to just collect money on an hourly and companies shouldnt be allowed to trap artists in.
I dont even really care that its NewJeans, i just happened to already love NewJeans.
I also DONT think NewJeans did anything wrong. They have a splintered management system now and they were being told by a brand new imposter “don’t go there” while their entire team who had legally set everything up originally was being fired/let go, and they chose to follow #1 the team they knew and #2 the ability to perform again because its their job. I think that they got really bad legal advice and should, if anything, just need to give those profits to HYBE from anything they earned as “NJZ”
Imagine they set everything up, had fans pay out tickets etc and just didnt show up on the flipside?
NewJeans never die
.
Yeah but once again having MHJ as CEO is unrelated to their contract.
And it might just be an argument for HYBE to show that NJ members were of bad faith
And never wanted to fix their relationship with HYBE
And they just use the opportunity of their legal action to put pressure on HYBE to bring back MHJ when it's unrelated to their contract
And it's just an argument that HYBE can use in court by saying that it's a proof that the reason why NJ are trying to nullify their contract isn't because of breach of trust but only to follow MHJ after she was fired
Sooyoung "I stand by law" and then proceeds to write essays every time saying how njz did something wrong as if it justifies Hybe plan of dungeoning them, as if justifies the work bullying they got bc yes, they got it, as if justifies Hybe trying to put others groups above them bc they were/are the biggest Hybe group post BTS.
If the judge favors njz, great, if it doesn't, it won't surprise me as we know how corrupted the world is, specially k-pop industry. So let's not act like the law is always right.
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!