Is Golden the biggest song in kpop history? [Vote]

  • Is Golden the biggest song in K-pop History? 45

    The result is only visible to the participants.

    I feel like Golden’s impact is never ending :!:


    I hear it on every radio station! My nieces and nephews and baby cousins (ages 3-10) love Golden and the KDH and all their little friends too! As a result parents/adults have been introduced to kpop!


    It feels like Golden is peak kpop :oops: ironically I’m not the biggest fan of the song! It’s very generic for me and I haven’t watched KDH yet (not sure why!) I’d much rather an actual kpop group got this hype instead of an animated movie!


    Like when Cupid blew up that was great! or APT (I know some don’t count this as Kpop) or Dynamite :/


    So I’m not the biggest fan of Golden but I can’t argue with the reality!

  • Tbh i don't even consider Golden as kpop


    It's a western song made at 99% of english lyrics and 1% of korean lyrics

    Part of a film produced by 2 western companies ( sony & netflix)

    And the singers aren't even promoting in korea or asia but have their entire career in the west ( at the exception of EJAE)


    It's not because it's part of a movie that talk about kpop that make of the soundtrack a kpop song

    It's a western song that people try to cosplay as a kpop song tbh


    So no it's still gagnam style

  • So most kpop Stans don’t consider Golden kpop but non kpop stans call Golden Kpop ^^


    Is Golden bigger than GS? What metrics do we have to measure Gs other than YouTube views :?:

  • So most kpop Stans don’t consider Golden kpop but non kpop stans call Golden Kpop ^^

    i thought we were all over it

    And all already came to the conclusion that non kpop stans are just racist ?


    The moment they see asian people saying one word that is not in english they consider it as Kpop

    Without even trying to know if it's actually in chinese or japanese or in koreans


    And thank god the singer of "Golden" are women


    Cuz if it were guys 98% of western people would have say that it's BTS who's singing,

    Considering that they have probably call every kpop boygroup who venture in western BTS at least once


    Because as we all know koreans people all look the same to each other....at least to non kpop stans eyes

  • Depends on who you ask because there's a good portion of people that aren't considering it a kpop song. I think Golden is a kpop song because it was written and performed by people that trained under the kpop system, but the song was made for a global audience. I think people don't want to start that conversation because there's plenty of kpop songs that are in English and many don't say it's not a kpop song


    Anyway, I was drifting a bit off topic. I think Golden is the biggest song because it became apart of pop culture. However, I think Gangam Style is the more important song because a song that's in Korean being that big across the globe was unheard of. Also, I think that song made more people check out kpop and I'm unsure if Golden is having that effect because the numbers to me seems most people are just checking out KDH and not other kpop artists.

  • I have the feeling people have forgotten how big Gangnam style was. It might have been the song with the biggest impact this century in the whole world, if not it's definitely in a top 3. It was so big that people forget Gentleman exists even though it was really big internationally too.


    Golden fights with APT for the 2nd position, I'd wait a bit to judge since APT has been out for a year and it's still proving its impact, Golden might fall out after the hype of the movie ends.

  • I think Golden is a kpop song because it was written and performed by people that trained under the kpop system

    Golden was written by EJAE and Mark sonnenblick

    So just 1 out of the 2 songwriter have a foot in kpop


    And neither audrey nuna or rei ami had ever been train under the kpop system

    So only EJAE have a kpop training



    You know that if we follow this logic that means DearAlice, Katseye etc...are more Kpop than "Golden" which i think a lot of us would actually disagree

  • Either Golden or Gangnam Style.


    But it's Golden at this point. Never underestimate the obsession of kids, and they are OBSESSED.


    You're about to see a lot of HUNTR/X members during Halloween this month.

    But then isn't that recency bias? I could've said "Never underestimate the obsession of kids, and they are OBSESSED" back when Gangnam Style was all the craze. And it was HUGE back then, just as Golden is now.


    And it's hard to compare the metrics of whether or not Golden has surpassed it because of it being paired with a movie, while Gangnam Style was a typical MV + Song release. Streaming and charting has also changed, at least a bit, from 2012 to 2025.


    If Golden truly has surpassed Gangnam Style, then it was definitely thanks to the movie. The song is great by all means, but the reason it went as viral as it did was because of the movie with it, while Gangnam style was released just like most kpop songs were. Hell, while APT had that Bruno Mars collab, even that song was still released in the typical song fashion. Golden sure has a boost!


    But I don't even consider Golden to be KPop the way Gangnam Style is, so they're not even in the same category in my mind.

  • And it's hard to compare the metrics of whether or not Golden has surpassed it because of it being paired with a movie, while Gangnam Style was a typical MV + Song release. Streaming and charting has also changed, at least a bit, from 2012 to 2025.

    I think it's one of the main reasons why i consider Gangnam style bigger


    If the song got so bigger it's only thanks to Psy and his crazy/"stupid" idea for the MV


    Which makes it actually really impressive how this guy suddenly blows up in the night while doing nothing besides releasing a song in korea

    Not even a promotion in the us

    Not heavy push by his company etc...


    While i still think Golden success is still impressive


    I find it less impressive than Gangnam style


    Cuz Golden was hard carry by the movie and the heavy promotion and heavy push Sony and Netflix did for this movies


    I don't think Golden would have receive this big success if yesterday a kpop group would have drop this song

    It would have stay in the niche of kpop fans but never reach such a big audience


    No kids would be singing the song if the movie didn't exist

    The western public wouldn't be aware of this song if they didn't watch the movie


    The success of Golden rely heavily on the movie

    While the success of Gangnam style rely only on the song and the MV and nothing more

  • No, it's not recency bias.


    I vividly remember when Gangnam Style dropped and blew up here, just like it happened yesterday.


    It was huge. The song was rotated into the playlist of every party I went to back then. Psy was performing on every morning and late night TV show and had that unforgettable collaboration with MC Hammer.


    I think the obsession over Golden and KPDH is even bigger than that. It's a total cultural phenomenon here.


    This is a movie already available for streaming on Netflix, and in a limited theatrical release for one weekend it was the highest earning movie at the box office. As a movie buff, I cannot emphasize enough how insane that is.


    Also, Gangnam Style was seen as more of a gag song, while Golden and KPDH is actually winning the public over for reasons related to its lyrics, message and the way it has resonated in the Asian-American community.


    In the U.S., it's not a competition in my eyes any longer.

  • That doesn't matter at all. This isn't a points system where you subtract points because Golden is tied to a movie. That doesn't make its overwhelming popularity any less real.


    What, are you going to tell analysts that streams don't count if they come from people who are only listening to the song due to KPDH?


    Do you not realize how silly that sounds?


    Who cares if Golden blew up thanks to KPDH blowing up, especially when one could easily say KPDH blew up BECAUSE of the phenomenal music, led by Golden.


    It's amazing how of all the demographics that could be predicted to try to chip away at Golden's accomplishments, it's K-Pop fans leading the charge by far.

  • Well, if I did consider it KPop, and it was solidified as the biggest KPop song in history, then I'd still consider Gangnam Style's time as way more impressive! Basically because of what SooYoung said.


    It's a matter of perspective, I guess.

  • For some reason I thought Rei had idol training, but I know Audrey doesn't because listened to her music in the past.


    I think this is where the line gets blurred. A lot of kpop songs are produced and written by westerners. Also, they receive a lot of demos from Western artist. So, it's tricky to see say how much of that process makes a song "kpop". I think Ejae's involvement and most likely making a kpop style of song for a global audience makes it a kpop song. I do see the argument where people don't consider it kpop because outside of Ejae it was created by westerners, and most likely for an American audience tbh.


    I don't listen to DearAlice, but it's why Katseye blurs the line about kpop. They were trained under the kpop system and some of their music does have a kpop flare. However, it's why people consider them kpop adjacent and the same could be said about KDH soundtrack. I still don't think KDH put more eyes onto kpop and KDH is it's own contained thing imo. I feel other kpop songs had a bigger impact, but if Golden is considered kpop, then it might be the biggest. However, I think I will still lean towards Gangam style because it was also in pop culture and it's much more of a kpop song and had a bigger impact for the industry.

  • Depends on who you ask because there's a good portion of people that aren't considering it a kpop song. I think Golden is a kpop song because it was written and performed by people that trained under the kpop system, but the song was made for a global audience. I think people don't want to start that conversation because there's plenty of kpop songs that are in English and many don't say it's not a kpop song

    It is a kpop song. Just like bts fully english singles that are written by foreign song writers are kpop. They are performed by korean artists that were trained in Korea.


    All dem jointz kpop songs are kpop songs, not american pop.


    Cannot believe we are still debating this. The song is literally soundtrack of the film called KPOP demon hunters and a lot of song have korean lyrics and have Koreans involved. And even if they were all foreigners it would still be kpop.

  • How is golden kpop adjacent but dynamite, a song written by non Koreans where all lyrics are in English, kpop?

    Very easy


    One is perform by kpop artist, the song is distributed by a kpop label and promoted by a kpop label


    The other one is perform by western artist, and distributed by a western label

    And appear as the soundtrack of a movie made by western studio


    If tomorrow i drop a rock song 99% in french and drop in the song some "saranghae" here and there

    And ends up appearing in a soundtrack of a movie talking the arrival of idol movement in korea

    I'm sorry but that doesn't make my song a kpop song


    We are talking about a SONG not the movie

    So outside of the song being linked to a movie talking about kpop


    There's absolutely nothing about this song that have any link to kpop

  • It is a kpop song. Just like bts fully english singles that are written by foreign song writers are kpop. They are performed by korean artists that were trained in Korea.


    All dem jointz kpop songs are kpop songs, not american pop.


    Cannot believe we are still debating this. The song is literally soundtrack of the film called KPOP demon hunters and a lot of song have korean lyrics and have Koreans involved. And even if they were all foreigners it would still be kpop.

    That’s what I was leaning towards. I think it becomes messy when arguing what makes a song kpop. I feel a song is kpop if somebody that is trained under Kpop system is involved in the process. There’s many hit kpop songs that was created by westerners because a company either bought demo or involved in producing the track.


    I feel this convo is happening with international fans because I don’t think any knetz are saying kdh songs aren’t kpop

  • That’s what I was leaning towards. I think it becomes messy when arguing what makes a song kpop. I feel a song is kpop if somebody that is trained under Kpop system is involved in the process.

    Not it's just that this logic is very very very flaw


    So now it means Halsey is an artist that release Kpop songs ?


    This logic is very flaw cuz it means that kpop artist can never break away from the kpop mold


    It means APT is a kpop song

    Whatever lisa and Jennie EP are, are kpop song


    Every Jpop song that kpop artist are releasing it's actually kpop


    It means that artist like Zhoumin or Zhang li yin aren't Cpop artist neither cuz they worked with SM for their debut


    I don't know if you can actually see how this argument, have so many flaws


    Cuz it literally means that if tomorrow RM decide to write a song for Beyonce

    And Beyonce decide to record it and release it in her next album

    It will means that Beyonce have started to make KPOP songs, just because a korean is involve in the process 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


  • To not call KPDH kpop is insulting to kpop because it deliberately takes from kpop. That’s like the whole point of it. Comparing to all the things you mentioned is just stupid and your own inferiority complex nothing more.

  • I feel this convo is happening with international fans because I don’t think any knetz are saying kdh songs aren’t kpop

    Obviously

    That's 101 political geography that we learn in junior high school in france


    It's "Soft Power", it happen very often that country takes credit for a thing even if they have just a very distant connections

    Here being a movie talking about kpop


    Because revendicating the success of golden and promoting it as a kpop song after the massive success of the song


    Will attract people attention to the country, makes some people want to visit it, learn more about it, and it develop the economy and tourism so by consequences the soft power of this country



    It's like how french love to revendicate themselves as " the country of pastry" only because it help give a better exposure to french food and it lead through the years to people considering french as The country of food and gastronomy

    And lead french people to revendicate a lot of pastry as "french pastry"

    When actually most of them aren't even french


    For example "croissant" is consider like the pastry by excellence that define France when actually it's from Austria


    And there's actually a lot of example like this through the years

  • Question what makes a song a kpop song ? Is it the producers


    I think golden blurs the line, but Ejae’s involvement makes me consider it kpop.


    Yeah, i think we’re in a weird spot where the blackpink solos blur the line because it’s made with mostly western producers and intended for a western audience rather than a kpop audience .


    I still consider it kpop because of background and that’s not a bad thing


    Again it brings back the question what makes a song Kpop?

  • If you associate yourself deliberately with kpop, you are kpop. That’s why some idol solos may not be considered kpop because they distance themselves from kpop while others are firmly kpop.


    This movie calls itself kpop and borrows heavily from kpop that’s why it is kpop. This is not hard and there’s nothing to debate here as well. You can SEE who wants to be kpop and who doesn’t want to be.


    Kpop is not one singular genre. It’s all about the association and always has been.

  • To not call KPDH kpop is insulting to kpop because it deliberately takes from kpop. That’s like the whole point of it. Comparing to all the things you mentioned is just stupid and your own inferiority complex nothing more.

    Inferiority complex of what ? Makes some sense when you try to make an argument


    It takes from kpop ? It takes what from kpop ?

    Kpop in itself isn't even a music genre


    Kpop is just a term use to refer to pretty much every music genre just sing in korean


    Kpop in itself is taking from american pop, japanese pop, hip hop, hyperpop who aren't even music genre that were born in korea


    Kpop is by definition just pop sing in korean


    And Golden is literally missing the key element of kpop SING IN korean considering that 98% of the song is sing in english


    Btw love to see how your two braincells are unable to have a civilize discussion about a subject without having to go as low as starting to attack people personally

    Trust me it's not because you start to use "complex" term like inferiority complex that it makes your argument interesting


    Actually it makes have even less impact seeing how you have to go as low to attack people to try to make a point

  • I explained it above already.


    And it also explains all the dumb example you gave.


    Chinese artist who left Korea dont want to be kpop.

    Korean acts who release Japanese music are actually never considered jpop they’re still closely tied to being kpop.

    Some solos and English releases keep their kpop roots and are kpop while other fully distance themselves and are not.


    What is kpop? Those that call themselves and associate with kpop. End of.

  • This thread contains 65 more posts that have been hidden for guests, please register yourself or login to continue reading.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!