[ALLEGED] Attrakt Demands Keena Reimburse Them for Legal Fees

Nonsense. JHJ is a saint and has never twisted the truth or told a lie. He would sell his car and survive on ramen for his artists!

As he should.

Sounds more like the court is ordering her, as one of the 4 members that bought the case, to bear the cost of the lawsuit. NOT Attrakt, but the courts themselves

Quote from ThePhantomThief

Sounds more like the court is ordering her, as one of the 4 members that bought the case, to bear the cost of the lawsuit. NOT Attrakt, but the courts themselves

External Content twitter.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

External Content twitter.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Display More

As they should. The law firm JHJ hired is very expensive indeed.

Quote from oneinamiyeon

As they should. The law firm JHJ hired is very expensive indeed.

External Content twitter.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Oh no, JHJ got the best representation he could to defend himself in a court case. THE NERVE OF SOME PEOPLE!

Quote from ThePhantomThief

Oh no, JHJ got the best representation he could to defend himself in a court case. THE NERVE OF SOME PEOPLE!

Exactly lmao, they're just grasping at straws. Everybody knows the justice system is 100% fair.

Quote from oneinamiyeon

Exactly lmao, they're just grasping at straws. Everybody knows the justice system is 100% fair.

External Content twitter.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Can't see the tweet, limited to certain people etc...

But I dont see the issue here. Korean law dictates that the losing litigants pay court fees. The four girls lost, even if Keena returned to the company. The law still means she has a debt to pay, and it does seem the company isn't actually allowed to "waive" the debt either, because part of the debt is paid to the courts.

Hey bzzz got soemthing to say?

Quote from ThePhantomThief

Sounds more like the court is ordering her, as one of the 4 members that bought the case, to bear the cost of the lawsuit. NOT Attrakt, but the courts themselves

You definitely did not know that

- The court cannot rule anyone who has withdrawn from the case.

- There has been no successful injunction attempt in this case.

- Attrakt letting Keena withdraw means any legal responsibility is privately settled between Keena and the Attrakt and out of the control of the court.

- Might it have been any injunction, one imposed onto Keena is automatically canceled once she is out of the case.

Quote from bzzz

You definitely did not know that

- The court cannot rule anyone who has withdrawn from the case.

- There has been no successful injunction attempt in this case.

- Attrakt letting Keena withdraw means any legal responsibility is privately settled between Keena and the Attrakt and out of the control of the court.

- Might it have been any injunction, one imposed onto Keena is automatically canceled once she is out of the case.

pretty sure there's 2 separate cases iirc.
1st is the where they lost. where they want out of the contract.
2nd one is where the fans keep calling "real cases" that still ongoing about all the misstreatment.

honestly this things is hard to follow

Quote from Rozysebelas

pretty sure there's 2 separate cases iirc.
1st is the where they lost. where they want out of the contract.
2nd one is where the fans keep calling "real cases" that still ongoing about all the misstreatment.

honestly this things is hard to follow

No. You basically mentioned on the same 1 case.

Former members demanded contract termination on the ground of mistreatment. They alleged that they wanted out because JHJ was abusive.

There is another case where JHJ sued the 3 former members for contract breaching. It makes 0 sense for JHJ to ask Keena to pay for the latter lawsuit as she has no involvement.

Quote from bzzz

No. You basically mentioned on the same 1 case.

Former members demanded contract termination on the ground of mistreatment. They alleged that they wanted out because JHJ was abusive.

There is another case where JHJ sued the 3 former members for contract breaching. It makes 0 sense for JHJ to ask Keena to pay for the latter lawsuit as she has no involvement.

isn't it get rejected like 1 time iirc ?? that one is with keena in it right ?? or am i trippin ??

Quote from Rozysebelas

pretty sure there's 2 separate cases iirc.
1st is the where they lost. where they want out of the contract.
2nd one is where the fans keep calling "real cases" that still ongoing about all the misstreatment.

honestly this things is hard to follow

It's hard because attention spans are short and perfect targets for mediaplay. If you zoom out and read between the lines, the picture becomes clearer:

The injunction (to terminate contract) case was dismissed - the court would only entertain the girls returning and would not allow for the introduction of evidence. Mediaplay made it seem like the girls didn't have evidence and "lost" the case. It's an easier pitch for the less informed to accept than the possibility the case was prematurely ended in a potentially eyebrow raising way.

Think about it. If Attrakt worked so hard to keep the girls in contracts, you have to ask why JHJ would, after getting the case (to terminate those very contracts) dismissed, turn around and then so easily terminate the contracts? Could it be a way to silence the girls? Now the girls can't even appeal the case since they basically won. The irony.

Anyways, that was a recap for season 1. Stay tuned for next season with more lawsuits, perhaps criminal cases this time. It ain't over til the fat lady sings.

Quote from Rozysebelas

isn't it get rejected like 1 time iirc ?? that one is with keena in it right ?? or am i trippin ??

Nothing is rejected. Yes, Keena was in this case.

interesting