According to science, people are more anti-male than racist

so who's killing millions of men based on their gender

When slapheaded chucklefucks like this chinless wundershit exist, influencing millions of males around the world with their violent, mysoginist and homohphobic, right wing bullshit, is it any wonder us Males aren't trusted anymore?

men did this to themselves, if you look at the terrible history they created because they thought they are superior because of idk what then you'll see why no one really likes men any more, and i know this seems very ironic coming from a boy group stan but even if i am one i can still hold men accountable for being pieces of shit humans and no not every man is going to be a bad person but its weird thats its a majority of them that act childish and like an idiot

Good.

I'm proud to be a man

send men to mars.

Quote from Daisy_Queen

That honestly makes sense. Men are the biggest threat to the existence of women even in ethnocentric countries

Men are the guarantee for the existence of women.

Just open your eyes and look around you. Pretty much everthing you see and need to survive was created by men.

That is so interesting but I can see this being true because all over my twitter feed I see people being anti men

I totally believe it. But at the same time..

Quote from unbannBLACPINK

so who's killing millions of men based on their gender

I guess men are gonna have to suck it up and deal

Quote from neonanton1

I mean of course they created things they forbid woman from doing anything else but cook&clean.

probably because it was necessary. division of labor and specialisation is effective. As if the men would choose to do all the work while the women could sit at home all day long.

In the last 10000 years all matriarchic societies either went extinct or achieved nothing.

Maybe thats why even in patriarchic civilisations female ruler like queen victoria or catherine the great didnt change anything.

Also that something from the past. Boomers could have complained like that. This generation dont really have an excuse that i only see male construction worker building roads or we barely get female trainees in the IT-industry.

Quote from neigl

probably because it was necessary. division of labor and specialisation is effective. As if the men would choose to do all the work while the women could sit at home all day long.

In the last 10000 years all matriarchic societies either went extinct or achieved nothing.

Maybe thats why even in patriarchic civilisations female ruler like queen victoria or catherine the great didnt change anything.

Also that something from the past. Boomers could have complained like that. This generation dont really have an excuse that i only see male construction worker building roads or we barely get female trainees in the IT-industry.

yeah not true and loads of bull shit

Men who came after Cathrin, Elizabeth and other great female rulers did their best to erase every good thing they did and portray them as sex crazy demons who rejected the gods calling for their genders

Quote from Lulu_Key

yeah not true and loads of bull shit

Men who came after Cathrin, Elizabeth and other great female rulers did their best to erase every good thing they did and portray them as sex crazy demons who rejected the gods calling for their genders

lol, keep argue like in kindergarten.

what are you talking about? both countries consider them as one of their greatest leaders.

you think they would get a title like "the great" from men who did their best to earse what they did?

they fell in line with all the men and women who ruled before and after them.

Fun Fact. Despite women allways claim they are so peacfull. victoria and catherine fought much more wars then their male counterparts.^^

Quote from neigl

Just open your eyes and look around you. Pretty much everthing you see and need to survive was created by men.

Lesson Number 1

This is Margaret Hamilton beside the apollo landing code she supervised to come into existence.

She laid the foundation for what software engineering and programing is today.

Considering that everything around us uses some sorta of digital programming nowadays, SAY THANK YOU TO WOMEN FOR SURVIVING

pasted-from-clipboard.jpg

Quote from neigl

Fun Fact. Despite women allways claim they are so peacfull. victoria and catherine fought much more wars then their male counterparts.^^

no one thinks of them as peaceful??????

Catherine and Elizabeth had to fight more bc they had more opposition and men challenging their rule. Victoria just did what every ruler under British empire did, no more no less

I cant believe in the god year of 2023, people still think only men can invent things

Like open a history book bro, unless you are from Florida cause I heard they are into book burning nowadays

Quote from godkingteshub

Which is why "statistics" on their own should never be accepted. There's a lot of variables besides number that are needed to fully conceptualize reality. That have been many contributions from women that have never even been recorded throughout history.

Its recorded

People just choose ignorance

Quote from Ves

I'm from Florida

Im sorry

Ill pray for you

Quote from Lulu_Key

Lesson Number 1

This is Margaret Hamilton beside the apollo landing code she supervised to come into existence.

She laid the foundation for what software engineering and programing is today.

Considering that everything around us uses some sorta of digital programming nowadays, SAY THANK YOU TO WOMEN FOR SURVIVING

pasted-from-clipboard.jpg

Display More

yes, i know her well. her legacy is that she came up with the name "software engineering" so software development was taken serious compaired to other engineering. she was not the first nor the only software engineer. marie curie would have been a much better example.

but in the end exceptions dont make the rule.

Quote from Lulu_Key

I cant believe in the god year of 2023, people still think only men can invent things

Like open a history book bro, unless you are from Florida cause I heard they are into book burning nowadays

who ever said that? lol. of course they can. i just question why not more women choose to go into IT-industry.

Quote from neigl

who ever said that? lol. of course they can. i just question why not more women choose to go into IT-industry.

Im in a stem field that is occupied by 90 percent plus men

Everyday men like you take offense on the fact that I exist in their work place. Then you fucking wonder why not every woman wants to have a toxic work place? Like no shit

Im clearly above them in rank and they act like I chopped their fingers off when I delegate tasks to them

Quote from Ves

crystalblues

whose gonna tell them about toxic workplace envoiroment they make for women? WHO? WHO?

Quote from Lulu_Key

Im in a stem field that is occupied by 90 percent plus men

Everyday men like you take offense on the fact that I exist in their work place. Then you fucking wonder why not every woman wants to have a toxic work place? Like no shit

Im clearly above them in rank and they act like I chopped their fingers off when I delegate tasks to them

whatever ur personal experience is, doesnt matter. mine for example is different.

anyway. if enough women would choose respective stem field there wouldnt be 90 percent men in the first place. Thats allready the problem. And if women keep avoiding those branches nothing will change.

IT came up in the 80s at a time women could allready choose their jobs freely. considering males still had to do conscription and were occupied much more with the exsisting industries, it was even expected women would make up the majority of the workforce.

Quote from Ves

Are you male?

no. of course not. im a bot. but a good one.

Quote from neigl

whatever ur personal experience is, doesnt matter. mine for example is different.

anyway. if enough women would choose respective stem field there wouldnt be 90 percent men in the first place. Thats allready the problem. And if women keep avoiding those branches nothing will change.

IT came up in the 80s at a time women could allready choose their jobs freely. considering males still had to do conscription and were occupied much more with the exsisting industries, it was even expected women would make up the majority of the workforce.

It's not in my job description to change the toxic male attitude. Hey if my company likes to pay me extra for giving them lessons, I might take them up on their offer.

I'll do my part by hiring only female students as intern but then again you guys would call that anti male. So full circle full circle

It's a full

Quote from Lulu_Key

It's not in my job description to change the toxic male attitude. Hey if my company likes to pay me extra for giving them lessons, I might take them up on their offer.

I'll do my part by hiring only female students as intern but then again you guys would call that anti male. So full circle full circle

It's a full

lol, if you can even hire the people in your workplace its just a progress and it will change over time. dont know what you even complain then.

if there are enough women who apply and if they are good enough, there isnt even the need for you to do gender discrimination.