JAPAN = MISSILES (Attack for Defense) ??? ; 2022.12.16

  • archive.today/pVOQl .=. nytimes.com/japan-security

    Japan Moves to Double Military Spending,

    With a Wary Eye on PRChina ; 2022.12.16

    The Japanese cabinet approved the first update

    to the country’s official security strategy in nine years,

    elevating (PRChina) Beijing over North Korea as the Top Threat.


    *** Begin Quote ***

    That (PRChina = Russia = *Military Aggression*) has allowed (Japan PM) Mr. Kishida to push forward defense measures that would have been viewed as extreme even recently in officially pacifist Japan, including the acquisition of (Attack) *MISSILES* that could be used to target bases in enemy territory in response to an attack.

    *** End Quote ***


    Observation -->

    (Here , me) Cannot 'blame' JAPAN for wanting *Attack* MISSILE *Warhead* capabilities ... (Trolling) But JAPAN should pass a LAW that says that JAPAN will *never* mention *FIRST STRIKE* Attack Missile Options , or say 'TORA TORA TORA' in that context either ... :wink: ... Wondering how long (*not* IF) before that JAPAN will be manufacturing their *own* Attack Missiles (Nuclear Warheads ???) ... Anyway , I have 'dibbs' on this possible future 'best selling' JAPAN Book Title -->


    'The JAPAN That Can SAY = *NUKED YOU* (*NO* LIE)' ... :watt:


    Possible new 'hawt' website domain name of the future -->

    https://The-USA-SKorea-ThatCanSayNO2missiles4TOJO.com

    Be the *First Responder* on Your Block

    To Own the Official *Limited Edition* T-Shirt ... :suure:


    apnews.com/technology-japan-national-security

    EXPLAINER: Why JAPAN is boosting its arms capability, budget ; 2022.12.17

    Observation --> JAPAN cannot wait any longer is the reality.
    (Trolling)--> Plus , *TESTING* their New MISSILES will allow

    JAPAN to shout 'TORA TORA TORA' when they launch one ... :p


    Remember ex-USA PREZ REAGAN --> 'Testing , 1 , 2 , 3' ... :woow:


    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Japan_That_Can_Say_No

    The JAPAN that Can Say NO ; Essays (Year 1989) ; Info

    Edited 8 times, last by krell ().

  • (Reserved for Feedback Replies , Observations , Information)

    forum.allkpop.com/thread/?postID=4095077

    Click for TOP Message this Thread


    apnews.com/article/china-beijing-russia-moscow

    Russia, PRChina (“no limits” friends) to hold joint NAVY drills ; 2022.12.19


    apnews.com/article/japan-north-korea

    North Korea threatens strong military steps against Japan ; 2022.12.20

    Observation (My Guess) --> N.KOREA *more* likely Missile Attacks JAPAN

    ... than S.KOREA , on a *first strike* basis.

    Edited 5 times, last by krell ().

  • forum.allkpop.com/thread/?postID=4095077

    Click for TOP Message this Thread

    The people who benefit most from war -->
    'Military Industrial Complex' = Arms Dealers ...

    NOT sure that say JAPAN (KISHIDA = PM) can exactly be 'accused' of 'cashing in' ($$$) on motives related to the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX (MIC) ... After all , JAPAN is *not* the one that is shooting MISSILES that pass over JAPAN territory ... N.KOREA (KIM JONG UN) is doing that ... But , do I think that *KISHIDA* sees it that there is MONEY to be earned for JAPAN in a creating MISSILES , and other WEAPONS ??? ... *Yes* , KISHIDA likely sees that too ($$$) ... On another level , why should S.KOREA , selling weapons to POLAND , have ALL the FUN ($$$$) ???


    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military–industrial_complex

    MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ('MIC' = Eisenhower , Year 1961) ; Info


    Observation -->

    (Past USA PREZ) EISENHOWER as WW2 *Supreme Commander* ('General' level rank = USA ARMY) was surely 'on target' when he spoke of the 'MIC' situation in Year 1961 ... EISENHOWER was likely *not* the first to note of it (MIC) ... But , it is to EISENHOWER's *credit* that he , as a 'Military Man' , leaving as a USA PREZ (Year 1961) , did *choose* to speak of that topic (MIC).


    archive.today/d3sVw .=. nytimes.com/defense-contractors-ukr-rus

    Military Spending Surges, Creating New Boom for Arms Makers ; 2022.12.18

    The combination of the war in Ukraine and concern

    about longer-term threats from Russia and China is driving

    a bipartisan push to increase U.S. capacity to produce weapons.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!