RE: "I wonder if people (dis-)liking Aespa‘s concept is a cultural thing"

  • Let's figure out what culture means first. Culture doesn't necessarily have to be geographic, ethnic, or what you may be thinking of.


    AKP has its own culture. We use lingo and make references no one else would understand. We run with it. Other people don't.


    Comics are cool now thanks to DC and Marvel taking over Hollywood, but there was a time when comic book enthusiasts were constantly mocked and ridiculed. They were reluctant to let people know they were into comics. That's comic book culture.


    The same could be said about anime. Otaku culture exists, and even many Japanese people look down on it.


    It's similar to how a lot of Koreans despise K-pop culture.


    So ultimately, it's cultural in the sense that it's a subculture and a niche, but not cultural in an ethnic, racial, or geographical way.


    SM has its own culture as a company. Much of that involves the cinematic theme. They've done this since way back. One notable example is S.E.S.'s "Dreams Come True." That iconic song included a made-up alien language for the rapping part. The MV is set in a fantasy world of some sort. Back then, I'm sure lots of people went crazy over the "lore" aspect of it. Now we only focus on the music because that was a great song.


    I'm not sure why aespa's concept gets singled out when it's simply SM being on-brand with what they've always done. SM Entertainment is the K-pop company that's closest to Disney. Disney has its own record label that's actually very prominent. They've got high-profile celebrities doing covers of hit songs. Look at how many official covers of "Let It Go" there have been. It's similar to how SM gets its artists to do covers of old hits. Disney often involves high-profile celebrities outside Disney in their projects. SM does something similar with SM Station. The cinematic part is self-explanatory.


    It's called SM Entertainment, not SM Music Group or SM Records. At the end of the day, it's an entertainment company and it won't limit itself to just music. This was the vision all along.


    Being mad at SM for involving lore is like being mad at Disney. Do you see how silly it is? If you don't like the concept, it's just not your thing. Some people don't like Frozen, but they don't start hate campaigns over it. I see so much hateful energy towards SM, its groups, and its artists just because they want to do well in an industry just as anyone else would.


    Here's another example. They had a whole musical involving SM stars. Very Disney-esque.

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • Lore and concepts aren’t new. You can go back to David Bowie’s Ziggy Stardust or KISS or Fundkadelic and Parliament to see ongoing lore and mythology in music. Even more recently artists have maintained their own lore and mythos through videos and recurring characters and themes. Daft Punk ran around with helmets on while Sia covered her face with giant wigs. All of these groups were successful - if people like the music, the gimmick is just a gimmick to break through the clutter.


    People act like aespa is so strange and out there when it’s really not. Someone already mentioned Gorillaz, which was what I always think of when people think the West is going to freak out about avatars. And there was recently a whole avatar singing competition tv show last year (it flopped but again, in a bitmoji, animal crossing world, this is not anything out of the ordinary. People create avatars all the time in everything from Fortnite to Facebook.)

    Word! Thanks for saying this. I immediately thought of David Bowie's alter egos when I saw people saying aespa is too weird for the West.


    Gorillaz


    Michael Jackson with the "Thriller" concept


    Prince with his whole thing about changing his name to a "love symbol" that combines both gender symbols


    Pink Floyd with their The Wall concept album, tour, and film (I saw that film as a kid and it changed the way I viewed music for sure)


    Beyoncé with the Sasha Fierce alter ego


    Kanye West with the "Runaway" short film and My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy album (which was really based on his grandiose fantasy)


    Eminem with the Slim Shady horror-themed alter ego


    Lore isn't anything new. It may be absurd, but music always included a bit of shock value. It got people thinking outside the box. Some listeners don't care about it and only like the music, and that's fine, too. Others love both the music and the concept.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!